This paper discusses how modal auxiliaries fit into a constructional view of language and how this view allows us to think in new ways about diachronic meaning change in modal auxiliaries. These issues will be illustrated on the basis of a diachronic corpus-based study of the modal auxiliary may, specifically focusing on changes in its collocational preferences during the past 200 years. The main point of this paper is the claim that a constructional view needs to take account of the mutual associations between modal auxiliaries and the lexical elements with which they occur. Changes in these mutual associations are usefully understood as change in a complex network of constructions.
Arppe, A., & Järvikivi, J. (2007). Every method counts - Combining corpus-based and experimental evidence in the study of synonymy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 3(2), 131–159.
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A. (2010). Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(2), 1–27.
Bergs, A. (2010). Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J., & Pagliuca, W. (1987). The development of future meaning. In A. Giacalone Ramat, O. Carruba, & G. Bernini (Eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 109–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, J., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R.D. (1991). Back to the future. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II1 (pp. 17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Church, K., & Hanks, P. (1989). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Proceedings of the
27th Annual Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics
, Vancouver, British Columbia (pp. 76–83).
Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words. Available online at [URL].
Davies, M. (2010). The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400+ million words, 1810-2009. Available online at [URL].
Diessel, H. (2011). Review article of ‘Language, usage and cognition’ by Joan Bybee. Language, 87(4), 830–844.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 641, 501–38.
Fischer, O. (2007). Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Godlberg, A.E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A.E., & van der Auwera, J. (2012). This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, 46(1), 109–132.
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004b). Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 225–236). Stanford: CSLI.
Hilpert, M. (2013a). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, M. (2013b). Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 421, 67–82.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C.J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sagi, E., Kaufmann, S., & Clark, B. (2011). Tracing semantic change with latent semantic analysis. In J. Robynson & K. Allan (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 161–183). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taylor, J.R. (2012). The Mental corpus. How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Traugott, E.C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57(1), 33–65.
Turney, P.D., & Pantel, P. (2010). From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 371, 141–188.
Visser, F. Th. (1969). An historical syntax of the English language. Part 3. First half. Syntactical units with two verbs. Leiden: Brill.
Wheeler, E.S. (2005). Multidimensional scaling for linguistics. In R. Koehler, G. Altmann, & R.G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 548–553). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Daugs, Robert & David Lorenz
2024. A radically usage-based, collostructional approach to assessing the differences between negative modal contractions and their parent forms. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
DESAGULIER, GUILLAUME & PHILIPPE MONNERET
2023. Cognitive Linguistics and a Usage‐Based Approach to the Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 31 ff.
2023. Martin Hilpert: Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar
. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 261 ff.
Xiao, Huangyang, Qiao Zhou & Ruyi Sun
2023. Martin Hilpert: Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar
. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 261 ff.
Budts, Sara
2022. A connectionist approach to analogy. On the modal meaning of periphrastic do in Early Modern English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 337 ff.
Desagulier, Guillaume
2022. Changesin the midst ofa construction network: a diachronic construction grammar approach to complex prepositions denoting internal location. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 339 ff.
2021. Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity inmod+advcollocations. English Language and Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 743 ff.
2020. Towards a dynamic behavioral profile: A diachronic study of polysemous sentir in Spanish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1 ► pp. 145 ff.
2018. Constructions as Triads of Form, Function, and Agency: An Agentive Cognitive Construction Grammar Study of English Modals. Cognitive Semantics 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Caudal, Patrick
2017.
Mari Alda , Modalités et temps: Des modèles aux données. (Sciences pour la communication, 109.) Bern: Peter Lang, 2015, xii + 249 pp. 978 3 0343 1383 4 (broché), 978 3 0351 9866 9 (EPUB), 978 3 0352 0280 9 (PDF). Journal of French Language Studies 27:3 ► pp. 466 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.