Article published In:
Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar
Edited by Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructions and Frames 8:1] 2016
► pp. 6685
References
Arppe, A., & Järvikivi, J
(2007) Every method counts - Combining corpus-based and experimental evidence in the study of synonymy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 3(2), 131–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A
(2010) Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(2), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, A
(2010) Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, R
(2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S
(2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
(2010) Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Fleischman, S
(1995) Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Pagliuca, W
(1987) The development of future meaning. In A. Giacalone Ramat, O. Carruba, & G. Bernini (Eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 109–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R.D
(1991) Back to the future. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II1 (pp. 17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, K., & Hanks, P
(1989) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics , Vancouver, British Columbia (pp. 76–83).
Coates, J
(1983) The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Davies, M
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
(2010) The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400+ million words, 1810-2009. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Diessel, H
(2011) Review article of ‘Language, usage and cognition’ by Joan Bybee. Language, 87(4), 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 641, 501–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O
(2007) Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Godlberg, A.E
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E., & van der Auwera, J
(2012) This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, 46(1), 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A
(2004a) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004b) Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 225–236). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M
(2013a) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 421, 67–82.Google Scholar
(2014) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C.J
(1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, N
(2009) Modal verbs in TIME. Frequency changes 1923-2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, F
(1984) The modals story retold. Studies in Language, 8(3), 305–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagi, E., Kaufmann, S., & Clark, B
(2011) Tracing semantic change with latent semantic analysis. In J. Robynson & K. Allan (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 161–183). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R
(2012) The Mental corpus. How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C
(1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57(1), 33–65.Google Scholar
Turney, P.D., & Pantel, P
(2010) From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 371, 141–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, F. Th
(1969) An historical syntax of the English language. Part 3. First half. Syntactical units with two verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E.S
(2005) Multidimensional scaling for linguistics. In R. Koehler, G. Altmann, & R.G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 548–553). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 26 other publications

Budts, Sara
2022. A connectionist approach to analogy. On the modal meaning of periphrastic do in Early Modern English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2  pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020. Putting connections centre stage in diachronic Construction Grammar. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert, Ilse Depraetere & Mégane Lesuisse
2019. The necessity modals have to, must, need to, and should . Constructions and Frames 11:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Caudal, Patrick
2017.  Mari Alda , Modalités et temps: Des modèles aux données. (Sciences pour la communication, 109.) Bern: Peter Lang, 2015, xii + 249 pp. 978 3 0343 1383 4 (broché), 978 3 0351 9866 9 (EPUB), 978 3 0352 0280 9 (PDF). Journal of French Language Studies 27:3  pp. 466 ff. DOI logo
Daugs, Robert
Daugs, Robert
2021. Contractions, constructions and constructional change. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Daugs, Robert
2022. English modal enclitic constructions: a diachronic, usage-based study of’dand’ll. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Desagulier, Guillaume
2022. Changesin the midst ofa construction network: a diachronic construction grammar approach to complex prepositions denoting internal location. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
DESAGULIER, GUILLAUME & PHILIPPE MONNERET
2023. Cognitive Linguistics and a Usage‐Based Approach to the Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics,  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
FLACH, SUSANNE
2021. Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity inmod+advcollocations. English Language and Linguistics 25:4  pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Eliese-Sophia Lincke, Kiki Nikiforidou & Anna Piata
2020. On the polysemy of motion verbs in Ancient Greek and Coptic. Studies in Language 44:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2018. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2020. The great temptation. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere
2021. Modality in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin & Susanne Flach
2021. Disentangling modal meanings with distributional semantics. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:2  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Jansegers, Marlies & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Towards a dynamic behavioral profile: A diachronic study of polysemous sentir in Spanish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Kranich, Svenja
Law, James
2023. Constructional change and frameelement selection. Constructions and Frames 15:1  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Leclercq, Benoît
2022. From modals to modal constructions. Constructions and Frames 14:2  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Schulze, Rainer & Pascal Hohaus
2020. Chapter 1. Modalising expressions and modality. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2018. Constructions as Triads of Form, Function, and Agency: An Agentive Cognitive Construction Grammar Study of English Modals. Cognitive Semantics 4:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
Wiesinger, Evelyn
Xiao, Huangyang, Qiao Zhou & Ruyi Sun
2023. Martin Hilpert: Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar . Folia Linguistica 57:1  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Xiao, Huangyang, Qiao Zhou & Ruyi Sun
2023. Martin Hilpert: Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar . Folia Linguistica 57:1  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.