) Modal versus temporal readings of auxiliaries: A constructionist view
. Paper presented at the workshop
Modal meaning and Construction Grammar. Third Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE)
, University of Zürich, 24-27 August 2014.
Cappelle, B., & Grabar, N
). Towards an n-grammar of English
. In S. De Knop
& G. Gilquin
(Eds.), Applied construction grammar
(pp. 271–302). Berlin: De Gruyter.
) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press)
) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present
) The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009
. Available online at [URL]
De Haan, F
) The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: The case of must
. English Studies
, 93(6), 700–728.
) Papers in linguistics
1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
Forsberg, M., Johansson, R., Bäckström, L., Borin, L., Lyngfelt, B., Olofsson, J., & Prentice, J
) Hedged performatives
. In P. Cole
& J.L. Morgan
(Eds.), Syntax and semantics
, Vol. 31 (pp. 187–210). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Gries, S. Th
) Coll.analysis 3.2a. A script for R to perform collostructional analyses
(accessed 16 April 2016).
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th
) The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns
. In A. Bergs
& G. Diewald
(Eds.), Constructions and language change
(pp. 23–45). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
) (De)coding modality. The case of must, may, måste, and kan
(Lund Studies in Linguistics, 113
). Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
Cited by 3 other publications
. Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity inmod+advcollocations
. English Language and Linguistics
pp. 743 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.