Cover not available
Article published In:
MetaNet
Edited by Miriam R.L. Petruck
[Constructions and Frames 8:2] 2016
► pp. 133–140

Introduction to MetaNet

| International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley
Published online: 6 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.01pet
References
Barnden, J., Glasbey, S., Lee, M., & Wallington, A
(2001) Reasoning in metaphor understanding: The ATT-Meta approach and system. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1188–1192). COLING: San Francisco.
The British National Corpus
(2001) version 2 (BNC World). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. [URL].
Dodge, E., Hong, J., & Stickles, E
(2015) MetaNet: Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 40–49). Denver: ACL. DOI logo
Feldman, J., Dodge, E., & Bryant, J
(2010) Embodied Construction Grammar. In B. Heine and N. Heiko (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quadreni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone’. Language, 641, 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gedigian, M., Bryant, J., Narayanan, S., & Ciric, B
(2006) Catching metaphors. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding (pp. 41–48). New York City.
Goldberg, A.E
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graff, D., & Cieri, C
(2003) English Gigaword LDC2003T05. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Hong, J., Stickles, E., & Dodge, E
(2013) The MetaNet metaphor repository: Formalized representation and analysis of conceptual metaphor networks. Paper presented at the 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Edmonton, Canada.
Huong, P.T
(2011) The metaphor “love is a journey” in English and Vietnamese. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 271, 176–184.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(958). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A
(1991) Master metaphor list. Second draft copy. Technical Report, Cognitive Linguistics Group, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lönneker-Rodman, B
(2008) The Hamburg metaphor database project: Issues in resource creation. Languages Resources and Evaluation, 421, 293–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lönneker-Rodman, B., & Narayanan, S
(2012) Computational approaches to figurative language. In M.J. Spivey, K. McRae, & M.F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 485–514). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, Z.J
(2004) CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, K.E (2011) Frames and the experiential basis of the moving time metaphor. Constructions and Frames, 3(1), 80–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, S
(1997) Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1999) Moving right along: A computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 121–129). Orlando: AAAI Press.
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M.R.L., Johnson, C.R., Baker, C.F., & Scheffczyk, J
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Shutova, E
(2010) Models of metaphor in NLP. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 688–697). Stroudsburg: ACL.
Sullivan, K.S
(2007) Grammar in metaphor: A construction grammar account of metaphoric language. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tekiroglu, S.S., Özbal, G., & Strapparava, C
(2015) Exploring sensorial features for metaphor identification. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 31–39). Denver: ACL. DOI logo
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Feldman, Jerome A.
2020. Advances in Embodied Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Feldman, Jerome A.
2022. Advances in Embodied Construction Grammar. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Lederer, Jenny
2019. Lexico-grammatical alignment in metaphor construal. Cognitive Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Rajeg, Gede Primahadi Wijaya & I Made Rajeg
2023. Exploring diachronic salience of emotion metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Sullivan, Karen
2023. Three levels of framing. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:5 DOI logo
Taniguchi, T., D. Mochihashi, T. Nagai, S. Uchida, N. Inoue, I. Kobayashi, T. Nakamura, Y. Hagiwara, N. Iwahashi & T. Inamura
2019. Survey on frontiers of language and robotics. Advanced Robotics 33:15-16 ► pp. 700 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.