This paper describes an innovative formalization of Conceptual Metaphor Theory and its implementation in a structured metaphor repository. Central to metaphor analysis is the development of an internal structure of frames and relations between frames, based on an Embodied Construction Grammar framework, which then informs the structure of metaphors and relationships between metaphors. The hierarchical nature of metaphors and frames is made explicit, such that inferential information originating in embodied conceptual primitives is inherited throughout the network. The present analysis takes a data-driven approach, where lexical differences in linguistic expressions attested in naturally-occurring discourse lead to a continued refinement and expansion of our analyses.
(2009) (ed.). Multilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography: Methods and applications. Berlin: de Gruyter.
(2013) Cognitive Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 233–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borin, L., Dannélls, D., Forsberg, M., Gronostaj, M.T., & Kokkinakis, D.
(2009) Thinking green: Toward Swedish FrameNet++. Poster presented at
TLT-8: The 8th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories
Bouveret, M., & Sweetser, E.
(2009) Multi-frame semantics, metaphoric extensions, and grammar. In I. Kwon, H. Pritchett, & J. Spence (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society (pp. 49–59). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
The British National Corpus
(2007) Version 3 (BNC XML Edition). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: [URL]
Clausner, T.C., & Croft, W.
(1999) Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–32.
(1993) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–70.
(2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2015) Metanet: Deep semantic analysis. In E. Shutova, B.B. Klebanov, & P. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics – human language technologies 3rd workshop on metaphor in NLP (pp. 40–49).
Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G.
(2005) Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006) From molecule to metaphor. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Feldman, J.A., Dodge, E.K., & Bryant, J.
(2009) A neural theory of language and Embodied Construction Grammar. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 111–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, J.A., & Narayanan, S.
(2004) Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392.
(1976) Frame Semantics and the nature of language. In S.R. Harnad, H.D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech, Vol. 2801 (pp. 20–32). Annals of the NY: Academy of Sciences.
(1982) Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.
(1988) The mechanisms of Construction Grammar. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society (pp. 35–55). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 347–378.
Gibbs, R.W., Lima, P.L.C., & Francozo, E.
(2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189–1210.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
(2008) ‘Superschemas’ and the grammar of metaphorical mappings. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 339–360). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Graff, D., & Cieri, C.
(2003) English Gigaword LDC2003T05. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C.J.
(1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33.
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
(2011) Methodological issues in conceptual metaphor theory. In S. Handl & H-J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 23–40). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krötzsch, M., Vrandecic, D., Völkel, M., Haller, H., & R. Studer
(2007) Semantic Wikipedia. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(4), 251–261.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
(1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.
(2008) The neural theory of metaphor. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1991) Master metaphor list. Second draft copy. Technical Report, Cognitive Linguistics Group. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, M.G., & Barnden, J.A.
(2001) Mental metaphors from the master metaphor list: Empirical examples and the application of the ATT-Meta system. Technical Report CSRP-01-03, School of Computer Science, The University of Birmingham, U.K.
(2008) The Hamburg metaphor database project: Issues in resource creation. Language Resources and Evaluation, 421, 293–318.
(1994) MetaBank: A knowledge-base of metaphoric language conventions. Computational Intelligence, 10(2), 134–149.
(1989) Petri nets. In M.G. Singh (Ed.), Systems and control encyclopedia: Theory, technology, applications (pp. 3665–3670). Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Nam, S., Park, J., Kim, Y., Ham, Y., Hwang, D., & Choi, K-S.
(2014) Korean FrameNet for semantic analysis. Proceedings of the
13th International Semantic Web Conference
(1997) Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect (KARMA). PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Ohara, K.H., Fujii, S., Ohori, T., Suzuki, R., Saito, H., & Ishizaki, S.
(2004) The Japanese FrameNet project: An introduction. In The fourth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 4) (Eds.), Proceedings of the satellite workshop “Building lexical resources from semantically annotated corpora” (pp. 9–11).
(1996) Frame Semantics. In J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013) Advances in Frame Semantics. In M. Fried & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.), Advances in Frame Semantics (pp. 1–12). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
(1985) Petri nets (an introduction). EATCS monographs on theoretical computer science, Vol. 41. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., & Perez Hernandez, L.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–185.
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M.R.L., Johnson, C.R., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.
Salomão, M.M.M., Torrent, T.T., & Sampaio, T.F.
(2013) A linguística de corpus encontra a linguística computacional: Notícias do projeto FrameNet Brasil. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, 55(1), 7–34.
(Eds.) (2006) Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Stickles, E., David, O., & Sweetser, E.
(2016) Grammatical constructions, frame structure, and metonymy: Their contributions to metaphor computation. In A. Healey, R.N. de Souza, P. Pešková, & M. Allen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th meeting of the high desert linguistics society (pp. 317–345). Albuquerque, NM: High Desert Linguistics Society.
(2006) Frame-based constraints on lexical choice in metaphor. In Z. Antić, C.B. Chang, E. Cibelli, J. Hong, M.J. Houser, C.S. Sandy, M. Toosarvandani, & Y. Yao (Eds.), 32nd annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society (pp. 387–400). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(2007) Grammar in metaphor: A construction grammar account of metaphoric language. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.