Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 9:1 (2017) ► pp.4169
References
Ariel, M.
(1990) Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ariel, M., Dattner, E., Du Bois, J. W., & Linzen, T.
(2015) Pronominal datives: The royal road to argument status. Studies in Language, 39(2), 257–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, R.
(1940) From hostage to contract. Illinois Law Review, 35(3), 281–292.Google Scholar
Bosworth, J.
(Ed. Northcote Toller, T.) (1898) An Anglo-Saxon dictionary based on the manuscript collections of the late Joseph Bosworth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Pagliuca, W.
(1985) Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical semantics, historical word formation (pp. 59–83). Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Torres Cacoullos, R.
(2009) The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language. Volume 1: Distribution and historical change (pp. 187–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2003) Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Volume 21 (pp. 47–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1977) The case for case reopened. In P. Cole & J. M. Sadock (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 8: Grammatical relations (pp. 59–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fotion, N.
(1981) I’ll bet you $10 that betting is not a speech act. In H. Parret, M. Sbisà, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics. Proceedings of the conference on pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, 1979 (pp. 211–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2002) The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1975) Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 47–112). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look at its fringes and its components (pp. 19–40). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Létoublon, F.
(1991) Promisi per iocum. In R. Coleman (Ed.), New studies in Latin linguistics: Selected papers from the 4th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Cambridge, April 1987 (pp. 163–185). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T.
(1994) Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2010) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice.Google Scholar
Stern, G.
(1968 [1931]) Meaning and change of meaning. With special reference to the English language. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Toller, T. N.
(1921) An Anglo-Saxon dictionary based on the manuscript collections of the late Joseph Bosworth. Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1991) English speech act verbs: A historical perspective. In L. R. Waugh & S. Rudy (Eds.), New vistas in grammar: Invariance and variation (pp. 387–406). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.
(2007) Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar