Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 9:1 (2017) ► pp.101–138

On the grammaticalization of Finnish colorative construction

| University of Helsinki

This paper concentrates on the diachronic development of the so-called Colorative Construction (CoC) in Finnish, a two-verb expression consisting of an A-infinitive and an ideophonically based descriptive (or ‘colorative’) finite verb, e.g. susi juos-ta jolkottele-e [wolf run-inf col-prs.3sg] ‘wolf runs trotting’. The paper combines variationist dialectal data, grammaticalization theory, and Construction Grammar formalization. The detailed diachronic description demonstrates that the development from proto-CoC to modern CoC is the epitome of constructionalization, i.e., a gradual process of grammatical changes whereby both the form and the function of an existing construction are altered, creating a new expression type. Major changes in the Balto-Finnic case system were the primary force behind this process. Constructionalization of the CoC itself included the first syntagmatic changes through reanalysis. This gradually created a new paradigmatic expression type, followed by paradigmatic extension through analogy, which widened the frame semantics of the newly coined type.

Keywords: Construction Grammar, constructionalization, infinitives, expressive verbs, corpus syntax, dialects, variation, diachronic syntax
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Overview of the Finnish Colorative Construction
    • 1.2Aims and organization
  • 2.Data
  • 3.Theoretical basis
  • 4.Grammaticalization of the CoC
    • 4.1Historical background: the proto-CoC
      • 4.1.1Previous research
      • 4.1.2Reconstruction of the proto-CoC
    • 4.2Constructionalization: from proto-CoC to the current CoC
      • 4.2.1Syntax → morphology
      • 4.2.2Morphology → morphophonemics (→ zero)
      • 4.2.3Analogy and semantic extensions
      • 4.2.4Crystallization of the CoC and a note on syntax → pragmatics
  • 5.Summary and discussion
  • Abbreviations and symbols
  • Notes
  • Data archives
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 20 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.9.1.04ham
References

Data archives

DMA Digitaalinen muoto-opin arkisto (Digital Morphology Archive). Collected by the Morphology Archive of the Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian, and Scandinavian Studies at the University of Helsinki and the CSC – IT Center for Science. Accessed 12 June 2016. Available at [URL]
KKSK Karjalan kielen sanakirja (Dictionary of Karelian). Online database for the list of lexical entries. Helsinki: Institute for the Languages of Finland. Accessed 12 June 2016. Updated periodically. Available at [URL]
LA Lauseopin arkisto (Syntax Archives). Institute for the Languages of Finland and the School of Language and Translation Studies at the University of Turku. Turku: Syntax Archives. Accessed 12 June 2016. Available at [URL]
SMS Suomen murteiden sanakirja (Dictionary of Finnish Dialects), vols. 1–81. Helsinki: Institute for the Languages of Finland. Accessed 12 Jun 2016. Available at [URL]
Anttila, R.
(1973) Internal reconstruction and Finno-Ugric (Finnish). In Th. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 111: Diachronic, areal and typological linguistics (pp. 317–353). The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1977) Toward a semiotic analysis of expressive vocabulary. Semiosis 5, Internationale Zeitschrift für Semiotik und ihre Anwendungen, Heft 11, 27–40.Google Scholar
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(Eds.) (2000) Usage-based models of language. CSLI Publications. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
(Eds.) (2008) Constructions and language change [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 194]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergsland, K.
(1994) Sydsamisk grammatikk [South Sami Grammar]. Second edition. Karasjok: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G.
(2007) Konstruktionen in der diachronen Sprachwissenschaft. In K. Fischer & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (pp. 79–103). Updated 2nd edition, Stauffenburg Linguistik Band 40. Germany: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Erhard Voeltz, F. K., & Kilian-Hatz, C.
(2001) Introduction. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44] (pp. 1–8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C., & Kay, P.
(1995) Construction Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Boas, H.
(Eds.) (2006) Grammatical constructions: back to the roots [Constructional Approaches to Language 4]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fried, M.
(2009) Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames, 1(2), 262–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J. -O.
(2004) Construction Grammar. A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J. -O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language 2] (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1980) The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 56(3), 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, L.
(1961) The structure and development of the Finnish language [Indiana University publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, Vol. 3]. Translated by J. Atkinson. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2010) Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 86(3), 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heikkilä, M. K.
(2014) Bidrag till Fennoskandiens språkliga förhistoria i tid och rum [dissertation]. Helsinki: Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, V., & Voutilainen, E.
(2009) Koloratiivirakenne Hirventappopaikka-romaanissa [The colorative construction in the novel Hirventappopaikka ]. In V. Heikkinen (Ed.), Kielen piirteet ja tekstilajit: Vaikuttavia valintoja tekstistä toiseen [Features and genres of the language: Expressive choices from a text to another] (pp. 135–169). Tietolipas 229. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herlin, I., Leino, P., & Visapää, L.
(2005) Kas siinä pulma [That is the question]. In I. Herlin & L. Visapää (Eds.), Elävä kielioppi: Suomen infiniittisten rakenteiden dynamiikkaa [Living grammar: The dynamic nature of Finnish infinitival structures] (pp. 9–38). Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 1021. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components [Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 158] (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. Closs
(2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikola, O., Palomäki, U., & Koitto, A.-K.
(1989) Suomen murteiden lauseoppia ja tekstikielioppia [Syntax and text linguistics of Finnish dialects]. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 511. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
ISK = Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R. & Alho, I. (2004) Iso suomen kielioppi [The extensive Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Available at [URL] [Accessed 18 Jan. 2016].
Itkonen, T.
(1964) Proto-Finnic final consonants: Their history in the Finnic languages with particular reference to the Finnish dialects I: 1. Introduction: The history of -k in Finnish. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
(1983) Välikatsaus suomen kielen juuriin [Retrospective view to the roots of Finnish]. Virittäjä, 871, 349–386.Google Scholar
Jarva, V. & Kytölä, S.
(2007) The Finnish colorative construction and expressivity. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 201, 235–272.Google Scholar
Jomppanen, M.
(2011) Pohjoissaamen ja suomen kielen koloratiivikonstruktio vertailussa [Comparison of colorative constructions in Finnish and North Saami]. In A. Kaivapalu, J. Laakso, P. Muikku-Werner, & M.-M. Sepper (Eds.), Lähivõrdlusi/Lähivertailuja 211 (pp. 106–131). Tallinn: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing. Available at [URL] [Accessed 28 Sep. 2016].
Karelson, R.
(1958) Soome-ugri keelte lausestruktuurist seoses konjunktsioonidega [Finno-Ugric clause structure with conjunctions]. Eesti Seltsi Aastaraamat IV1, 195–213.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F.
(1999) Finnish: An essential grammar. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.Google Scholar
Kettunen, L.
(1943) Vepsän murteiden lauseopillinen tutkimus [Syntactic research on Veps dialect]. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia LXXXVI. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B.
(2012) The English binominal NP construction: a construction grammar approach. Plenary presentation at 7th International Conference on Construction Grammar in Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Korhonen, M.
(1981) Johdatus lapin kielen historiaan [An introduction to the history of Saami language]. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 370. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Leino, J.
(2005) Frames, profiles and constructions: Two collaborating CGs meet the Finnish permissive construction. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions [Constructional Approaches to Language 3] (pp. 89–120). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
([1982] 2002) Thoughts on grammaticalization. Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt, Nr. 9. Second, revised edition. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Philosophische Fakultät.Google Scholar
Lehtinen, T.
(2007) Kielen vuosituhannet. Suomen kielen kehitys kantauralista varhaissuomeen [Millenia of the language. Evolution of Finnish language from Proto-Uralic to early literal Finnish]. Tietolipas 215. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Mihkla, K.
(1964) Öeldis [Predicate]. In K. Mihkla (Ed.), Eesti keele süntaks I: prooviartikleid lihtlause süntaksi alalt [Syntax of Estonian I: research articles on the syntax of simple sentences] (pp. 66–101). Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Mikone, E.
(2001) Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & C. Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44.] (pp. 224–233). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nickel, K. P.
(1994) Samisk grammatikk [Sami Grammar]. Second, revised edition. Karasjok: Davvi Girji O. S.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K.
([1926] 1979) Laerebok i lappisk (samisk), I Grammatikk [Schoolbook on Sami, I Grammar]. Second edition. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Noël, D.
(2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14 (2), 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posti, L.
(1980) Vatjan kielen Kukkosin murteen sanakirja [The dictionary of Votic dialect of Kukkos]. Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae XIX. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Põlma, V.
(1967) Onomapoeetilised verbid eesti kirjakeeles [Onomatopoetic verbs in Estonian literary language]. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Ringe, D.
(2008) Internal reconstruction. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 244–261). Third Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Rostila, J.
(2004) Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlsson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Available at [URL] [Accessed 14 Oct. 2016].
(2006) Storage as a way to grammaticalization. Constructions 11/2006 Available at [URL] [Accessed 17 Apr. 2016].
Rytkönen, A.
(1937) Koloratiivinen konstruktio [The colorative construction]. Virittäjä, 411, 95–104.Google Scholar
Saukkonen, P.
(1965) Itämerensuomalaisten kielten tulosijainfinitiivirakenteiden historiaa I: johdanto: adverbiaali infinitiivi [The history of Balto-Finnic lative infinitival constructions I: Introduction: Adverbial infinitive]. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 137. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
(1966) Itämerensuomalaisten kielten tulosijainfinitiivirakenteiden historiaa II: adverbaali infinitiivi (täydennys), adnominaali infinitiivi, absoluutti infinitiivi, elliptinen infinitiivi [The history of Balto-Finnic lative infinitival constructions II: Adverbial infinitive (supplement), adnominal infinitive, absolute infinitivi, elliptic infinitive]. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 140. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Setälä, E. N.
(1880) Suomen kielen lauseoppi: Oppikirjan koe [Finnish syntax: A trial for a schoolbook]. Helsinki: K. E. Holm.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs
(2008a) Grammatikalisierung, emergente Konstruktionen und der Begriff der “Neuheit”. In K. Fischer & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik [Stauffenburg Linguistik Band 47] (pp. 5–32). Germany: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
(2008b) Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs, & Heine, B.
(Eds.) (1991) Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume 1. Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs, & Trousdale, G.
(2014) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In E. Closs Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90] (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtaranta, P.
(1986) Haljärven lyydiläismurteiden muoto-oppia [Morphology of Ludic dialects in Haljärvi]. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 190. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Ylikoski, J.
(2011) A survey of the origins of directional case suffixes in European Uralic. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles (pp. 235–280). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Defining non-finites: Action nominals, converbs and infinitives. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 161, 185–237.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ge, Shan
2021. Informatization Construction of University Archives Management under the Background of Information Age. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1744:3 ► pp. 032017 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Law, James
2023. Constructional change and frameelement selection. Constructions and Frames 15:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.