Edited by Svend Erik Larsen, Steen Bille Jørgensen and Margaret R. Higonnet
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIII] 2022
► pp. 201–223
This essay ventures to show how the novel and its many negotiations of feelings, sympathy in particular, but also its antithesis, antipathy, feed into an exploration of emotional life as connected to the sphere of everyday practices related to home and family, often embedded in situations of crisis. My main examples are Charles Dickens’s Bleak House (1852–1853), Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina (1873–1877), and Knut Hamsun’s Sult (1890), three nineteenth-century novels that in terms of style, plot and character are quite distinct in varying ways, hence suited to challenge and broaden the notion of realism. Style, character, and plot are in each novel inextricably interwoven with the landscape in which it is set, whether it be the outdoor life or the home, but inner and outer ‘realities’ are played out differently, thus forming specific versions of the realist project. While Bleak House and Anna Karenina stay within the realm of literary realism, Hunger does not, hence it represents a sort of crisis not only in terms of emotions, but also in terms of the novel genre.