To be specified published in:
Landscapes of Realism: Rethinking literary realism in comparative perspectives. Volume II: Pathways through realism
Edited by Svend Erik Larsen, Steen Bille Jørgensen and Margaret R. Higonnet
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIII] 2022
► pp. 385–403

Caricature and realism

| Aarhus University
The two dynamic centers of caricature in the nineteenth century were England and France. Here, censorship was flexible enough to create a space for public satire targeting both the new and old social classes and types in the emergent modern society. The satirists mock the elite holding the political and economic power, and do so with an attitude ranging from roaring laughter to a discreet smile. With a both verbal and visual dimension, caricatures became part of the satire in both visual prints and printed texts, not least in the new journals, newspapers and magazines that flourished in the nineteenth century based on new reproductive technologies and a growing readership, an urban readership in particular. Caricatures found their topics in all corners of society and approached indiscriminately high and low, crowds and individual, politics and daily habits, traditions and transitory phenomena in a mixture of laughter and afterthought. With readings in Nikolai Gogol’s Mertvye Dushi (1842), Charles Baudelaire’s essays on laughter and caricature (1855–1857) and visual caricatures by James Gillray, Grandville and an anonymous caricaturist, this case study will focus on caricatures of people and objects. The main problems to be discussed concern the contribution of caricatures to the reshaping of the understanding of human identity and of the material universe of the modern world.
Keywords: caricature, stereotyping, laughter, censorship, Charles Baudelaire, Nikolai Gogol, James Gillray, Charles Philipon, realism
Article outline
  • 1.Ambiguous stereotyping
  • 2.Being oneself and another
  • 3.Caricature as public engagement
  • 4.Is this caricature?
  • Notes
  • Works cited
Published online: 16 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxiii.10lar
References

Works cited

Appelbaum, Stanley and Richard Kelly
eds. 1981 Great Drawing and Illustrations from Punch, 1841–1901. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles
1980a “De l’essence du rire” [1855] In Œuvres complètes, edited by Claude Roy and Michel Jamet, 690–701. Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar
1980b “Quelques caricaturistes français” and “Quelques caricaturistes étrangers” [1857] In Œuvres complètes, edited by Claude Roy and Michel Jamet, 702–21. Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar
Billing, Michael
2005 Laughter and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bindman, David
2003 “How the French became frogs: English caricature and a national stereotype.” Apollo 158.498: 15–25.Google Scholar
Champfleury (Jules François Félix Husson)
1857 Le réalisme. Paris: Michel Lévy frères.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine
2017 Les Chiffonniers de Paris. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Daumier Register
2020 The Daumier Register. Accessed July 26, 2020. www​.daumier​-register​.org
Doizy, Guillaume and Jacky Houdré
2008 Marianne dans tous ses états: la République en caricature de Daumier à Plantu. Paris: Alternatives.Google Scholar
Gogol, Nikolai
2008 Mertvye dushi [1842] Moscow: Eksmo.Google Scholar
2010 Dead Souls, translated by Isabel Hapgood. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
Goode, Mike
2016 “The Public and the Limits of Persuasion in the Age of Caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 117–36. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grandville
1844 Un Autre Monde. Paris: Fournier.Google Scholar
Hannoosh, Michele
1992 Baudelaire and Caricature: From the Comic to an Art of Modernity. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian
2020 The Rise of Victorian Caricature. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Werner
1956 Die Karikatur von Leonardo bis Picasso. Vienna: Rosenbaum.Google Scholar
Kerr, David
2000 Caricature and French Political Culture 1830–1848. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Le Men, Ségolène
2016 “The Musée de la caricature .” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 175–93. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mainardi, Patricia
2017 Another World: Nineteenth-Century Illustrated Print Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McLees, Ainslie Armstrong
1984 “Baudelaire and Caricature: Argot plastique .” Symposium 38.3: 221–33.Google Scholar
Patten, Robert L.
2016 “Signifying Shape in Pan-European Caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 137–57. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porterfield, Todd
ed. 2016 The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rivers, Christopher Whalen
1994 Face Value: Physiognomical Thought in Marivaux, Lavater, Balzac, Gautier, and Zola. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, David Francis
2018 The Politics of Parody: A Literary History of Caricature, 1760–1830. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tytler, Graeme
1982 Physiognomy in the European Novel: Faces and Fortunes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Judith
1982 A Human Comedy: Physiognomy and Caricature in 19th Century Paris. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Woolf, Reva
2016 “John Bull, Liberty and Wit: How England Became Caricature.” In The Efflorescence of Caricature, 1759–1838, edited by Todd Porterfield, 49–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar