Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory
Author
This study represents a contribution to the theory of meaning in natural language. It proposes a semantic theory containing a set of regular relational principles. These principles enable semantic theory to describe connections from the lexical reading of a word to its figurative contextual reading, from one variant reading of a polysemous lexical item to another, from the idiomatic to its literal reading or to the literal reading(s) of one or more of its component lexical items. Semiotic theory provides a foundation by supplying principles defining motivated expression-content relations for signs generally. The author argues that regular semantic relational principles must dervive from such semiotic principles, to ensures the psychological reality and generality of the semantic principles.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 20] 1981. xiii, 252 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. v
-
0. Introduction | p. 1
-
1. Regular relations in semantic theory | p. 7
-
2. The semiotic basis of semantic regularity | p. 21
-
3. Regular semantic relations | p. 71
-
4. The problem of polysemy | p. 109
-
5. Derived polysemy | p. 139
-
6. The lexicon | p. 155
-
7. Motivation in complex units | p. 173
-
8. Extra-linguistic information in semantic relations | p. 195
-
9. Poetic figures | p. 209
-
Conclusion | p. 227
-
Notes | p. 231
-
-
Index | p. 245
Cited by
Cited by 36 other publications
Ahmadgoli, Kamran & Morteza Yazdanjoo
2020. Multimodal representation of social discourses in Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation: a social semiotic study. Social Semiotics 30:5 ► pp. 699 ff. 
Bamiro, Edmund
2014. Stylistic Functions of ‘Discollocation’ in Soyinka’s Novels: A Sytemic-functional Analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:12
Barcelona, Antonio
2014. Bogusław Bierwiaczonek, Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox, 2013. Pp. iv + 291.. Journal of Linguistics 50:3 ► pp. 712 ff.
Basile, Grazia
2021. Categorization, Memory and Linguistic Uses: What Happens in the Case of Polysemy. In Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 27], ► pp. 95 ff.
Benczes, Réka
Berghel, H. L. & David L. Sallach
1985. Computer Program Plagiarism Detection: The Limits of the Halstead Metric. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1:3 ► pp. 295 ff.
Brink, Nina
2023. Metonymic relations underlying the one-word utterances of Afrikaans-speaking infants and toddlers. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Brugman, Claudia
Carstens, Adelia
1993. 'n Funksionele benadering tot metonimie. South African Journal of Linguistics 11:3 ► pp. 85 ff.
Chen, Xianglan, Fang Li, Yachao Duan & Yahui Duan
2019. The length of preceding context influences metonymy processing. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Corkum, Phil
2022. Is ‘cause’ ambiguous?. Philosophical Studies 179:9 ► pp. 2945 ff.
Devylder, Simon
2019. Chapter 8. Mereology in the flesh. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 199 ff.
Du, Jing & Fuyin Thomas Li
2022. The convergence and divergence of extension and intension on semantic change. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 438 ff.
Feng, William Dezheng
2017. Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication 16:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Fábregas, Antonio
2015. Structural Sensitivity as an Argument for Semantic Underspecification. In Semantics of Complex Words [Studies in Morphology, 3], ► pp. 217 ff.
Fábregas, Antonio
2016. Deconstructing the non-episodic readings of Spanish deverbal adjectives. Word Structure 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hameed, May Tahseen & Hind Tahseen Hameed
2021. THE EMPLOYMENT OF ZEUGMA AND SYLLEPSIS IN ADAGES AND FAMOUS QUOTES AS A KIND OF DISCOURSE GENERA. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 9:4 ► pp. 167 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2020. On Patterns of Conceptual Construal in Tok Pisin. In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 43 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette & Caroline Tagg
2016. Metonymy and Text Messaging: A Framework for Understanding Creative Uses of Metonymy. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw018 ff.
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.
Murphy, Elliot
2021. Predicate order and coherence in copredication. Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff.
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
Norrick, Neal R.
1988. Binomial Meaning in Texts. Journal of English Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Nöth, Winfried
1985. Verbale und vokale Kommunikation. In Handbuch der Semiotik, ► pp. 251 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
Papafragou, Anna
1996. Figurative language and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 5:3 ► pp. 179 ff.
Perini, Mário A.
2019. Notes on Methodology. In Thematic Relations, ► pp. 47 ff.
Perini, Mário A.
2022. Anmerkungen zur Methodik. In Thematische Rollen und Relationen, ► pp. 51 ff.
Radden, Günter
2018. Chapter 6. Molly married money. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 161 ff.
Rasulic, Katarina
2017. Chapter 8. Shakespeare on the shelf, Blue Helmets on the move. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 200 ff.
Saka, Paul
2013. Quotation and the Use-Mention Distinction. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1], ► pp. 367 ff.
Sridhar, Kaushik
2012. Corporate conceptions of triple bottom line reporting: an empirical analysis into the signs and symbols driving this fashionable framework. Social Responsibility Journal 8:3 ► pp. 312 ff.
Swanepoel, P. H.
1992. Linguistic motivation and its lexicographical application. South African Journal of Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 49 ff.
WEISS, DAVID
2005. Metonymy in Black and White: Shelby Steele's Revelatory Racial Tropes. Howard Journal of Communications 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 june 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General