Lexical rules vs. constructions

Cited by 78 other publications

No author info given

2014. . In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],

No author info given

2014. Acknowledgements. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. ix ff.

No author info given

2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 1 ff.

No author info given

2014. Chapter 2. Theoretical pre-requisites. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 17 ff.

No author info given

2014. Chapter 3. Cognitive models. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 59 ff.

No author info given

2014. Chapter 4. Cognitive operations. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 85 ff.

No author info given

2014. Chapter 5. Content operations across levels of representation. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 147 ff.

No author info given

2014. Chapter 6. Conclusions. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 223 ff.

No author info given

2014. References. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 227 ff.

No author info given

2014. Name index. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 245 ff.

No author info given

2014. Subject index. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 249 ff.

No author info given

2014. . In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],

No author info given

2015. . In Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 17],

No author info given

2020. . In English Resultatives [Constructional Approaches to Language, 26],

No author info given

2020. . In Frame-Constructional Verb Classes [Constructional Approaches to Language, 28],

No author info given

2021. . In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100],

Afonso, Susana

2008. Existentials as impersonalising devices: the case of European Portuguese. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:2 ► pp. 180 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna

2011. Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy. Morphology 21:3-4 ► pp. 619 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Tonya Kim Dewey

2019. The alternating predicate puzzle. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea

2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 1 ff.

Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder

2018. Construction Grammar and language contact. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 5 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2015. Constructionalization and post-constructionalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 213 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2018. Distributional assimilation in constructional semantics. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 143 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2022. The Curious Case of Ditransitive Pity, or the Productivity of an Unproductive Pattern. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 337 ff.

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse

2004. . In Cognitive Linguistics,

Dattner, Elitzur

2019. The Hebrew dative: Usage patterns as discourse profile constructions. Linguistics 57:5 ► pp. 1073 ff.

Diller, Hans-Jürgen

2017. Glynn, D., & Robinson, J. A., eds. (2014). Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 141 ff.

Forsberg, Markus, Richard Johansson, Linnéa Bäckström, Lars Borin, Benjamin Lyngfelt, Joel Olofsson & Julia Prentice

2014. From construction candidates to constructicon entries. Constructions and Frames 6:1 ► pp. 114 ff.

Gaeta, Livio

2017. Valency alternations between inflection and derivation. In Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 237], ► pp. 328 ff.

GOLDBERG, ADELE E.

2013. Argument Structure Constructions versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates. Mind & Language 28:4 ► pp. 435 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2010. Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (Topics in English Linguistics 57). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. Pp. vi + 310.. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 149 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2014. Chapter 6. Bringing together fragments and constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 181 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2017. Chapter 5. Exploring inter-constructional relations in the constructicon. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 135 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler

2018. Situating Valency Theory in functional-cognitive space. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 348 ff.

Guerrero Medina, Pilar

2017. Chapter 9. The English conative as a family of constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 277 ff.

Guerrero Medina, Pilar

2020. Meaning construction and motivation in the English benefactive double object construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 94 ff.

Gyselinck, Emmeline

2020. (Re)shaping the constructional network. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 108 ff.

Gyselinck, Emmeline & Timothy Colleman

2016. Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 55 ff.

Herbst, Thomas

2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 56 ff.

Herbst, Thomas

2022. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122], ► pp. 55 ff.

HOVAV, MALKA RAPPAPORT & BETH LEVIN

2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 129 ff.

IWATA, SEIZI

2006. Where Do Constructions Come From? (W. Croft, Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:2 ► pp. 493 ff.

IWATA, SEIZI

2019. <i>Advances in Research on Semantic</i><i> Roles </i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 35:2 ► pp. 327 ff.

Iwata, Seizi

2021. Another look at the interaction between verbs and constructions. Constructions and Frames 13:2 ► pp. 263 ff.

Iza Erviti, Aneider

2021. From Discourse Markers to Construction Grammar(s) in Discourse. In Discourse Constructions in English [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 7 ff.

Jaeger, T. Florian & Harry Tily

2011. On language ‘utility’: processing complexity and communicative efficiency. WIREs Cognitive Science 2:3 ► pp. 323 ff.

Jiang, Canzhong & Xu Wen

2022. Semantics of the Chinese passive construction with retained object. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Kiyama, Naoki

2017. When tense meets constructional meaning. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:2 ► pp. 273 ff.

Klotz, Michael

2019. Explaining Explain: Some Remarks on Verb Complementation, Argument Structure and the History of Two English Verbs. English Studies 100:3 ► pp. 339 ff.

Lewandowski, Wojciech

2014. The locative alternation in verb-framed vs. satellite-framed languages. Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 864 ff.

Luzondo Oyón, Alba

2014. Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 30 ff.

Lyngfelt, Benjamin

2018. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 1 ff.

Löwenadler, John

2015. Relative clause extraction: Pragmatic dominance, processing complexity and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

MINO, TAKASHI

2020. A CONSTRUCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE <i>THERE SPEAK</i> EXPRESSION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CONTEXT. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 36:2 ► pp. 145 ff.

NEMOTO, NORIKO

2012. Locative Alternation: A Lexical-Constructional Approach. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29:1 ► pp. 166 ff.

NISBET, TIM

2020. Meaning, metaphor, and argument structure. Journal of Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 629 ff.

Paszenda, Joanna

2017. Chapter 8. Motivation behind the extended senses of the Polish ditransitive construction. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.

Pedersen, Johan

2014. Chapter 8. Variable type framing in Spanish constructions of directed motion. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 269 ff.

Pedersen, Johan

2019. Verb-based vs. schema-based constructions and their variability: On the Spanish transitive directed-motion construction in a contrastive perspective. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 473 ff.

Percillier, Michael

2020. Allostructions, homostructions or a constructional family?. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 214 ff.

Perek, Florent

2014. Rethinking constructional polysemy. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 61 ff.

Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten

2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 354 ff.

Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman, Freek Van de Velde & Stefan Grondelaers

2021. Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 487 ff.

Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman & Antal van den Bosch

2022. Generating hypotheses for alternations at low and intermediate levels of schematicity. The use of Memory-based Learning. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 305 ff.

Romain, Laurence

2022. Putting the argument back into argument structure constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, Alba Luzondo Oyón & Paula Pérez Sobrino

2017. Introduction. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 1 ff.

Sarda, Laure & Benjamin Fagard

2022. Chapter 1. Introduction: The description of motion events. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 1 ff.

Schönefeld, Doris

2018. Friending someone into submission: Verbal cues for understanding. Word Structure 11:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Sivonen, Jari

2016. The Finnish abstract motion constructionmennäV-mA-An[go V-inf-ill] ‘do something unwished’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 247 ff.

Stern, Nancy

2018. Ditransitives and the English System of Degree of Control. In Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 76], ► pp. 157 ff.

Szcześniak, Konrad

2019. Meaning hides in the confusion of the construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 58 ff.

Trijp, Remi van

2020. Making good on a promise. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 357 ff.

van Trijp, Remi

2016. Chopping down the syntax tree. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 15 ff.

Vázquez-González, Juan G. & Jóhanna Barðdal

2019. Reconstructing the ditransitive construction for Proto-Germanic: Gothic, Old English and Old Norse-Icelandic. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2 ► pp. 555 ff.

Welke, Klaus

2020. Konstruktionsgrammatik: Konstruktionen ohne Grammatik?. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:2 ► pp. 389 ff.

Xia, Xiaorong

2017. Verb Class-Specific Caused-Motion Constructions. Chinese Semiotic Studies 13:3 ► pp. 269 ff.

Zehentner, Eva

2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 525 ff.

Zehentner, Eva & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2020. Constructional networks and the development of benefactive ditransitives in English. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 168 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.