Lexical rules vs. constructions

Cited by other publications

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. ix ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 1 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 17 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 59 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 85 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 147 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 223 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 227 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 245 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 249 ff.

No author info given

2014.  In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],

No author info given

2014. From construction candidates to constructicon entries: An experiment using semi-automatic methods for identifying constructions in corpora. Constructions and Frames 6:1 ► pp. 114 ff.

No author info given

2015.  In Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 17],

No author info given

2020.  In English Resultatives [Constructional Approaches to Language, 26],

No author info given

2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames 12:1

No author info given

2020. Meaning construction and motivation in the English benefactive double object construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1

Afonso, Susana

2008. Existentials as impersonalising devices: the case of European Portuguese. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:2 ► pp. 180 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna

2011. Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy. Morphology 21:3-4 ► pp. 619 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Tonya Kim Dewey-Findell

2019. The alternating predicate puzzle. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea

2015.  In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 1 ff.

Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder

2018.  In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 5 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2015.  In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 213 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2018.  In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 143 ff.

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse

2004.  In Cognitive Linguistics,

Diller, Hans-Jürgen

2017. Review of Glynn, D. & J. A. Robinson, eds. (2014) Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 141 ff.

Gaeta, Livio

2017.  In Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 237], ► pp. 328 ff.

GOLDBERG, ADELE E.

2013. Argument Structure Constructions versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates. Mind & Language 28:4 ► pp. 435 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2010. Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (Topics in English Linguistics 57). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. Pp. vi + 310.. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 149 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2014.  In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 181 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 135 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler

2018. Situating Valency Theory in functional-cognitive space. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 348 ff.

Guerrero Medina, Pilar

2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 277 ff.

Gyselinck, Emmeline

2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 108 ff.

Gyselinck, Emmeline & Timothy Colleman

2016. Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 55 ff.

HOVAV, MALKA RAPPAPORT & BETH LEVIN

2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 129 ff.

IWATA, SEIZI

2006. Where Do Constructions Come From? (W. Croft, Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:2 ► pp. 493 ff.

Jaeger, T. Florian & Harry Tily

2011. On language ‘utility’: processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2:3 ► pp. 323 ff.

Kiyama, Naoki

2017. When tense meets constructional meaning. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:2 ► pp. 273 ff.

Klotz, Michael

2019. Explaining Explain: Some Remarks on Verb Complementation, Argument Structure and the History of Two English Verbs. English Studies 100:3 ► pp. 339 ff.

Lewandowski, Wojciech

2014. The locative alternation in verb-framed vs. satellite-framed languages: A corpus study of Spanish and Polish. Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 864 ff.

Luzondo-Oyón, Alba

2014. Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 30 ff.

Lyngfelt, Benjamin

2018.  In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 1 ff.

Löwenadler, John

2015. Relative clause extraction: Pragmatic dominance, processing complexity and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

NEMOTO, NORIKO

2012. Locative Alternation: A Lexical-Constructional Approach. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29:1 ► pp. 166 ff.

NISBET, TIM

2019. Meaning, metaphor, and argument structure. Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Paszenda, Joanna

2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.

Pedersen, Johan

2014.  In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 269 ff.

Percillier, Michael

2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 214 ff.

Perek, Florent

2014.  In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 61 ff.

Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten

2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 354 ff.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, Alba Luzondo Oyón & Paula Pérez Sobrino

2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 1 ff.

Schönefeld, Doris

2018. Friending someone into submission: Verbal cues for understanding. Word Structure 11:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Sivonen, Jari

2017. The Finnish abstract motion constructionmennäV-mA-An[go V-inf-ill] ‘do something unwished’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 247 ff.

Stern, Nancy

2018.  In Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 76], ► pp. 157 ff.

Szcześniak, Konrad

2019. Meaning hides in the confusion of the construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 58 ff.

van Trijp, Remi

2016. Chopping down the syntax tree. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 15 ff.

Zehentner, Eva & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 168 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.