Some dialects of Dutch show systematic exceptions to final devoicing in the first person singular of verbs ending in a long or tense vowel and a fricative. This observation raises questions about the morphology – what makes the first person singular of verbs so special? –, and about the phonology – what makes fricatives after long vowels so special? As to the morphological side of things, this paper argues that the first person singular suffix, which used to be a schwa, is still present as an abstract vocalic position. From the phonological point of view, I argue that Dutch fricatives have a phonological length contrast rather than a voicing contrast. Since (empty) syllabic positions and consonant length both are expressed in the phonotactic dimension, it is expected that they interact.
2015. Dialect change and its consequences for the Dutch dialect landscape. How much is due to the standard variety and how much is not?. Journal of Linguistic Geography 3:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Vaux, Bert & Brett Miller
2011. The Representation of Fricatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Oostendorp, Marc
2008. Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology. Lingua 118:9 ► pp. 1362 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.