: On the grammaticalization of *kw i-/kw o- relative clauses in Proto-Indo-European

Luján, Eugenio R.

doi:10.1075/cilt.305.22luj

Article published in:

Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages: Papers presented at the workshop on Indo-European Linguistics at the XVIIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 2007
Edited by Vit Bubenik, John Hewson and Sarah Rose
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305] 2009
► pp. 221–234

On the grammaticalization of *kw i-/kw o- relative clauses in Proto-Indo-European

Eugenio R. Luján

Published online: 16 July 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.305.22luj

Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Auderset, Sandra

2020. Interrogatives as relativization markers in Indo-European. Diachronica 37:4 ► pp. 474 ff.

Gandon, Ophelie

2018. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 163 ff.

Keidan, Artemij

2020. Marking of quality modifiers in 2nd-generation IE languages. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 477 ff.

Kwon, Kyongjoon

2015. What isforfor?: Reconstructing the development ofwhat forconstruction in russian. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:3 ► pp. 305 ff.

Mitrenina, Olga V.

2012. The Syntax of Pseudo-Correlative Constructions with the Pronoun KOTORYJ (‘Which’) in Middle Russian. Slovene 1:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Weiß, Helmut

2020. Where do complementizers come from and how did they come about?. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:1 ► pp. 30 ff.

É. Kiss, Katalin

2022. From relative proadverb to declarative complementizer: the evolution of the Hungarian hogy ʻthatʼ. The Linguistic Review 0:0

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.