Constraints on compounds and incorporation

Marianne Mithun | University of California, Santa Barbara

This chapter examines the status of a type of compounding often cited as a construction that straddles the boundary between morphology and syntax. Noun incorporation constructions in Kapampangan, Mohawk, and Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo are evaluated with respect to the No Phrase Constraint and the Lexical Integrity Hypothesis. Though they share certain fundamental properties, the constructions differ in crucial ways, reflecting differing stages of diachronic development.

Published online: 28 April 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.05mit

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Ackema, Peter

2014. Japanese Causatives are Not Relevant To Lexical Integrity. Studia Linguistica 68:2 ► pp. 169 ff.

Basso, Ellen B.

2014. In Word Formation in South American Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 163], ► pp. 181 ff.

Harðarson, Gísli Rúnar

2016. Peeling away the layers of the onion: on layers, inflection and domains in Icelandic compounds. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Olthof, Marieke, Eva van Lier, Tjeu Claessen, Swintha Danielsen, Katharina Haude, Nico Lehmann, Maarten Mous, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Eline Visser, Marine Vuillermet & Arok Wolvengrey

2020. Verb-based restrictions on noun incorporation across languages. Linguistic Typology 0:0

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.