This chapter argues that there is no absolute boundary between analogy and abstract schemas in word formation. Patterns of compounding are captured by constructional schemas of various degrees of abstraction. The necessity of such subschemas is argued for on the basis of observations on semantic specialization, headedness variation, diachrony, and allomorphy selection. Analogy and abstract schemas are opposite endpoints on a scale of schematicity.
2022. Compound-internal anaphora: evidence from acceptability judgements on Italian argumental compounds. Morphology 32:4 ► pp. 359 ff.
Lorenz, Antje, Pienie Zwitserlood, Stefanie Regel & Rasha Abdel Rahman
2019. Age-related effects in compound production: Evidence from a double-object picture naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:7 ► pp. 1667 ff.
Mattiello, Elisa & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2018. The Morphosemantic Transparency/Opacity of Novel English Analogical Compounds and Compound Families. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
2013. Compounding and its locus of realization: Evidence from Greek and Turkish. Word Structure 6:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Riches, Nick G., Tom Loucas, Gillian Baird, Tony Charman & Emily Simonoff
2012. Interpretation of compound nouns by adolescents with specific language impairment and autism spectrum disorders: An investigation of phenotypic overlap. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 14:4 ► pp. 307 ff.
Toratani, Kiyoko
2023. How did COVID-19 impact the use of Japanese complex words with masuku ‘mask’ in 2020?. Linguistics Vanguard 0:0
Udoh, EmemObong O. & Moses E. Ekpenyong
2022. A Tonal Re-patterning Framework for Modeling Anaañ Nominal Constructions. In Current Issues in Descriptive Linguistics and Digital Humanities, ► pp. 569 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.