Article published in:Current Issues in Morphological Theory: (Ir)regularity, analogy and frequency. Selected papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, 13–16 May 2010
Edited by Ferenc Kiefer †, Mária Ladányi and Péter Siptár
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322] 2012
► pp. 65–82
Revisiting exocentricity in compounding
Evidence from Greek and Cypriot
In this paper, the authors challenge the widespread view that the distinction between endocentric and exocentric compounds is fundamentally semantic. On the basis of data from Greek and Cypriot they propose, instead, that this is a structural distinction and that semantics cannot be a safe criterion for classifying exocentric compounds into various categories. They show that morphological features, e.g. gender and inflection class, cannot define exocentricity, since both Greek and Cypriot have many endocentric compounds displaying different features from those of their head. It is suggested that exocentricity might be an epiphenomenon of the order of application of the word-formation processes, according to which, when compounding and derivation co-occur within the same morphologically complex item, compounding precedes derivation. In contrast, a structure is endocentric if it contains only compounding, or involves derivation and compounding, in this particular order. Finally, the authors provide evidence that exocentric compounds may belong to the productive word-formation mechanism.
Published online: 30 May 2012
Cited by 7 other publications
Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib
Andreou, Marios & Angela Ralli
Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo, Reginald Akuoko Duah & Ọbádélé Kambon
Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Martina Werner
Nóbrega, Vitor A. & Phoevos Panagiotidis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.