This paper discusses the notion of morphological complexity and differentiates language external complexity (E-complexity) from language internal complexity (I-complexity). While E-complexity is measurable on the basis of the statistical occurrences of affixes and their combinations with roots, I-complexity can be measured on the basis of the number of operations applying in the derivation of morphological forms. The author compares results from studies classifying languages based on their E-complexity to results from studies showing similarities between languages with respect to I-complexity. The comparison reveals that languages with different E-complexity may have similar I-complexity. The author revisits results from psycholinguistic and parsing experiments and discusses how the two sorts of complexity can be reduced. Finally, the role of I- and E-complexity for the understanding of the relation between the language faculty and the external systems is considered.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.