Article published in:English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23-27 August 2010
Edited by Irén Hegedűs and Alexandra Fodor
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325] 2012
► pp. 349–368
Beyond questions and answers
Strategic use of multiple identities in the historical courtroom
Exploring the discursive process of identity construction and ascription, the study reveals the ways in which a set of identities emerged in and through the dynamic interaction between the lawyers and the witness of a homosexual rape trial in 18th century London. Grounded in Goffman’s notion of footing, the study argues that, through sequential turns of questions and answers, these identities were interactively constructed and negotiated by the lawyers and the witness. Shifting into and departing from a particular identity can be seen as a strategic means by which the participants contextualized and framed the local context of the rape trial to substantiate their legal arguments and to offset oppositional arguments that might render the testimony inconsistent and invalid. The findings indicate that such identities allowed the participants to assume and speak from particular perspectives (logical, moral, and psychological) with respect to the event at issue, thereby shaping courtroom reality by either mitigating or magnifying the culpability of the witness.
Published online: 13 November 2012
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.