Cover not available
Part of
Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 49–70

Roots, concepts, and word structure

On the atoms of lexical semantics

| University College Dublin

This chapter examines the relation between the structure of words as linguistic objects and their conceptual content. It addresses two questions: what are the primitives of lexical semantic interpretation, and how they are expressed in the grammatical and morphological representation of a lexical item. The answer involves a characterization of roots as theoretical objects, followed by an argument to the effect that it is not roots, but larger structures of variable size which relate to lexical concepts. An in-depth discussion of nouns leads to the claim that the conceptual content of a lexical item does not reflect its grammatical structure, because a concept is not the meaning of a linguistically defined unit, but a language-external cognitive content, globally associated with the lexical word as a whole.

Published online: 27 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.04acq
References
Acquaviva, Paolo
2008 Lexical Plurals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “Roots, categories, and nominal concepts”. Lingue e Linguaggio 8.25–51.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The roots of nominality, the nominality of roots. The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer Oxford Oxford University Press DOI logo
Alexiadou, Artemis
2011 “Plural Mass Nouns and the Morpho-Syntax of Number”. Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics ed. by Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz, 33–41. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available at [URL], document #2433.
Arad, Maya
2005 Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-Syntax. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994 Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007 “In the Beginning was the Word”. Language 83.803–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basilico, David
2008 “Particle Verbs and Benefactive Double Objects in English: High and Low Attachments”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26.731–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2003 “Exo-skeletal vs. Endo-skeletal Explanations: Syntactic Projections and the Lexicon”. The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory ed. by John C. Moore & Maria Polinsky. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2005a In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005b The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1992 Current Morphology. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeBelder, Marijke
2008 “Size Matters. Towards a Syntactic Decomposition of Countability”. Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics ed. by Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop, 116–122. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Raphäel Girard, Calisto Mudzingwa & Martina Wiltschko
2012 “The Internal Syntax of Shona Class Prefixes”. Paper presented at the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012.
Embick, David & Alec Marantz
2008 “Architecture and Blocking”. Linguistic Inquiry 39:1.1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry
1998 Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fradin, Bernard & Françoise Kerleroux
2009 “L’identité lexémique”. Aperçus de morphologie du français ed. by Bernard Fradin, Françoise Kerleroux & Marc Plénat. 83–102. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria
1998 “Formazione dei nomi di agente, strumento e luogo in catalano”. Atti del XXI congresso internazionale di linguistica e filologia romanza ed. by Giovanni Ruffino, vol. 2, 383–392. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel Jay Keyser
2002 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection”. The View from Building 20 ed. by Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1999 “What is a concept, that a person may grasp it?” Concepts: Core Readings ed. by Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis, 305–333. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Originally published 1989, Mind and Language.Google Scholar
2002 Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & David Pitt
2000 “Compositional Idioms”. Language 76.409–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2011 “The Roots of Change of State Verbs”. Paper presented at the workshop Approaches to the Lexicon (Roots III), Jerusalem, June 2011. Available at [URL]
Kramer, Ruth
2009 Definite Markers, Phi-Features, and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Laurence, Stephen & Eric Margolis
1999 “Concepts and Cognitive Science”. Concepts: Core Readings ed. by Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis, 3–81. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
2009 “Lexical Semantics of Verbs II: The Structure of Event Structure”. Lecture handout. Available at [URL]
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995 Unaccusativity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
2004 Morphology and Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Duca, Maria G
2004 “Nomi di agente”. La formazione delle parole in italiano ed. by Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer, 191–218. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth
2000 On Clear and Confused Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2011 “Root ‘Content’ and Lexical Semantics”. Paper given at the workshop Approaches to the Lexicon (Roots III), Jerusalem, June 2011.
Picallo, Carme
2005 “Some Notes on Grammatical Gender and l-Pronouns”. Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachwissenschaft 119 ed. by Klaus von Heusinger, Georg Kaiser & Elisabeth Stark, 107–121. Konstanz.Google Scholar
Pietroski, Paul
2008 “Minimalist Meaning, Internalist Interpretation”. Biolinguistics 2.317–340 Available at [URL].
Polomé, Edgar
1967 Swahili Language Handbook. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Quine, William van Orman
1960 Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz
2004a “Il significato delle regole di formazione di parole”. La formazione delle parole in italiano ed. by Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer, 13–16. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2004b “I suffissiismoeesimo”. La formazione delle parole in italiano ed. by Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer, 256–260. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988 The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Acquaviva, Paolo
2016. Morphological Semantics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Pritchard, Tim
2022. Proprietary linguistic meaning. Synthese 200:5 DOI logo
Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston
2019. Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.