Article published in:
Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 7196
References

References

Bauer, Laurie & Salvador Valera
eds. 2005Approaches to Conversion / Zero Derivation. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
eds. 2008Constructions and Language Change. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blank, Andreas
1997aPrinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997b“Outlines of a Cognitive Approach to Word-Formation”. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists ed. by Bernard Caron, paper No. 0239. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
2003“Words and Concepts in Time: Towards Diachronic Cognitive Onomasiology”. Words in Time: Diachronic Semantics from Different Points of View ed. by Regine Eckardt, Klaus von Heusinder & Christoph Schwarze, 37–65. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004“Cambio semantico e formazione delle parole”. La formazione delle parole in italiano ed. by Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer, 23–30. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert, Christian Lehman, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopetas
eds. 2000 2004 Morphologie/Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation. 2 vols. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Danielle
1987Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. 2 vols. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1968“Les structures lexématiques”. Probleme der Semantik ed. by Wilhelm Theodor Elwert, 3–16. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Croft, William & David Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DELI = Manlio Cortelazzo
& Michele A. Cortelazzo ed 1999Il nuovo etimologico. DELI – Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana. 2nd ed. Bologna Zanichelli.
Detges, Ulrich
1998“Echt die Wahrheit sagen: Überlegungen zur Grammatikalisierung von Adverbmarkern”. Philologie im Netz 4.1–29.Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit
2002“Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: A Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21.151–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DHLF = Alain Rey
ed. 1992. Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. 2 vols. Paris: Dictionnaires le Robert.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2008“Konstruktionen in der diachronen Sprachwissenschaft”, Fischer et al. , eds. 2008–2011, vol. I, 79–103.Google Scholar
Don, Jan, Mieke Trommelen & Wim Zonneveld
2000“Conversion and Category Indeterminacy”. Booij et al. , eds. 2000, vol. I, 943–952.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green
2006Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fill, Alwin
2004“Remotivation and Reinterpretation”. Booij et al. , eds. 2004, vol. II, 1615–1625.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1988“The Mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’”. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14.35–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988“Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone”. Language 64.501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2008“Konstruktionsgrammatik: Ein Überblick”. Fischer et al. , eds. 2008–11, vol. I, 3–17.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin, Anatol Stefanowitsch, Alexander Lesch & Alexander Ziem
eds. 2008 2011 Konstruktionsgrammatik 3 vols Tübingen Stauffenburg
Fleischer, Wolfgang
2000“Die Klassifikation von Wortbildungsprozessen”. Booij et al. , eds. 2000, vol. I, 886–897.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman
2004“Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch”. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective ed. by Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman, 11–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gévaudan, Paul
2007Typologie des lexikalischen Wandels: Bedeutungswandel, Wortbildung und Entlehnung am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Gévaudan, Paul & Peter Koch
2010“Sémantique cognitive et changement lexical”. Grandes voies et chemins de traverse de la sémantique cognitive ed. by Jacques François, 103–145. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele Eva
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003“Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language”. Trends in Cognitive Science 7.219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria & Franz Rainer
eds. 2004La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Grzega, Joachim
2004Bezeichnungswandel: Wie, Warum, Wozu? Ein Beitrag zur englischen und allgemeinen Onomasiologie. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002“On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2011“Was ist Konstruktionswandel?”. Fischer et al. , eds. 2011, vol. III, 59–75.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jacob
2000“Compositionality of Meaning”. Booij et al. , eds. 2000, vol. I, 851–857.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter
1982Wortbildung und Semantik. Düsseldorf: Schwann-Bagel.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter
1999“Tree and fruit: A cognitive-onomasiological approach”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 28:2.331–347.Google Scholar
2000“Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: aspect onomasiologique”. Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique ed. by Jacques François, 75–95. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
2001a“Bedeutungswandel und Bezeichnungswandel: Von der kognitiven Semasiologie zur kognitiven Onomasiologie Metonymy”. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 121.7–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b“Lexical Typology from a Cognitive and Linguistic Point of View”. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook/Ein internationales Handbuch/Manuel international. 2 vols ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible, vol. II, 1142–1178. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004“Diachronic Onomasiology and Semantic Reconstruction”. Lexical Data and Universals of Semantic Change ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch & Reinhild Steinberg, 79–106. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2005“Taxinomie et relations associatives”. Sens et Références/Sinn und Referenz: Mélanges Georges Kleiber/Festschrift für Georges Kleiber ed. by Adolfo Murguía, 159–191. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
2012a“Es gibt keine Konstruktionsbedeutung ohne Bedeutungswandel. Valenz – Konstruktion – Diachronie”. Ki bien voldreit raisun entendre: Mélanges en l’honneur du 70e anniversaire de Frankwalt Möhren ed. by Stephen Dörr & Thomas Städtler, 147–174. Strasbourg: Éditions de linguistique et de philologie.Google Scholar
2012b“The Pervasiveness of Contiguity and Metonymy in Semantic Change”. Current Methods in Historical Semantics ed. by Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson, 259–311. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard
1994“Wortbildung, Metapher und Metonymie: Prozesse, Resultate und ihre Beschreibung”. Wortbildungslehre ed. by Bruno Staib, 1–15. Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
2002English Lexicology. Lexical Structure, Word Semantics & Word-formation. 3rd edition. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2008“Lexical Nonsense and Morphological Sense: On the Real Importance of ‘Folk Etymology’ and Related Phenomena for Historical Linguists”. Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory. The Rosendal Papers ed. by Thórhallur Eythórsson, 307–328. Amsterdam & Philadelpha: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Hans
1969The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. 2nd edition. München: H. C. Beck.Google Scholar
Mutz, Katrin
2000Die italienischen Modifikationssuffixe: Synchronie und Diachronie. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Naumann, Bernd & Petra M. Vogel
2000“Derivation”. Booij et al. , eds. 2000, vol. I, 929–943.Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. CD-ROM version 3.00
. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.Google Scholar
Olschansky, Heike
1996Volksetymologie. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panagl, Oswald
2005“Volksetymologie und Verwandtes”. Lexikologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen ed. by Alan D. Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job & Peter Rolf Lutzeier, 2 vols, 1346–1352. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz
1993Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005“Semantic Change in Word Formation”. Linguistics 43.415–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sablayrolles, Jean-François
2000La néologie en français contemporain. Examen du concept et analyse de productions néologiques récentes. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Sauer, Hans
2004“Lexicalization and Demotivation”. Booij et al. , eds. 2004, vol. II, 1625–1636.Google Scholar
Tournier, Jean
1985Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’anglais contemporain. Paris: Nathan; Genève: Slatkine.Google Scholar
1991Structures lexicales de l’anglais. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003“Constructions in Grammaticalization”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen
1964Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra M.
1996Wortarten und Wortartenwechsel: Zu Konversion und verwandten Erscheinungen im Deutschen und in anderen Sprachen. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P.
1996“Natural Tendencies of Semantic Change and the Search for Cognates”. The Comparative Method Reviewed ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 264–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, Wiecher
2000“Correspondence between Formal and Semantic Relations”. Booij et al. , eds. 2000, vol. I, 840–850.Google Scholar