Article published in:
Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 97–124

Indirect coding

| University of Erfurt
Morphologically and syntactically conditioned alternations indirectly code their conditioner. The distinction between semantic information that is coded by a property of an expression and semantic information that conditions and constrains a property of an expression brings rigor into linguistic description and makes us understand an important mechanism of interpretation and reanalysis of linguistic structure. The paper provides a theoretical basis for describing indirect coding both on the paradigmatic and on the syntagmatic axis, but then focuses on syntagmatically mediated coding.
Published online: 27 February 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.06leh
References

References

Blair, Robert W.
1964 Yucatec Maya Noun and Verb Morpho-Syntax. Bloomington: Indiana University PhD diss. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms (65–3466).Google Scholar
Blair, Robert W. & Refugio Vermont-Salas
1965 Spoken (Yucatec) Maya. Book 1: Lessons 1–12. Chicago: University of Chicago, Dept. of Anthropology (Reprint: Columbia, Miss.: Lucas Brothers, 1979).Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1985 Morphonology. The Dynamics of Derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1954 “Two Models of Grammatical Description”. Word 10.210–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1959 “Boas’ View of Gammatical Meaning”. American Anthropologist 61.139–145. Reprint in 1971, Word and Language. Selected Writings, vol. 2, 489–496. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1970 “Language in Relation to Other Communication Systems”. Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica ed. by Camillo Olivetti, 3–16. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità. Reprint in 1971, Word and Language. Selected Writings, vol. 2, 697–708. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kabak, Bar??, Kazumi Maniwa & Nina Kazanina
2010 “Listeners Use Vowel Harmony and Word-Final Stress to Spot Nonsense Words: A Study of Turkish and French”. Laboratory Phonology 1.207–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Martin Haspelmath
1998 “Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues de l’Europe”. Actance et valence dans les langues de l'Europe ed. by Jack Feuillet, 525–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003 “Why Languages Differ: Variation in the Conventionalisation of Constraints on Inference”. Language Variation. Papers on Variation and Change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff ed. by David Bradley, Randy La Polla, Boyd Michailovksy & Graham Thurgood, 113–144. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002 “New Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 1–18. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Sur l'évolution du pronom possessif”. Latin et langues romanes. Études de linguistique offertes à József Herman à l'occasion de son 80ème anniversaire ed. by Sándor Kiss, Luca Mondin & Giampaolo Salvi, 37–46. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian, Yong-Min Shin & Elisabeth Verhoeven
2004 Person Prominence and Relation Prominence. On the Typology of Syntactic Relations with Particular Reference to Yucatec Maya. 2nd edition. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language”. Linguistics 17.356–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1972 Inflectional Morphology. A Theoretical Study Based on Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1880 Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke
1990 “Zur Verselbständigung sprachlicher Einheiten: der deutsche Umlaut”. Spielarten der Natürlichkeit - Spielarten der Ökonomie. Beiträge zum 5. Essener Kolloquium über “Grammatikalisierung: Natürlichkeit und Systemökonomie” vom 6.10.-8.10.1988 an der Universität Essen ed. by Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger & Thomas Stolz, 185–205. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
2004 “Morphologisierung: von der Phonologie zur Morphologie”. Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, vol. 2 ed. by Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas, 1600–1611. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar