Diachrony and the polysemy of derivational affixes
In this paper we discuss two cases of seemingly polysemous derivational affixes: the Ewe suffix -ví, originally a noun meaning “child”, which has acquired a number of different semantic values in word formation, as e.g. “inexperienced” (núfíáláví “inexperienced teacher”) or “person who adheres to the typical behaviour of a group” (amredzóví “someone who behaves like a foreigner”, and the Mandarin Chinese suffix -bā, originally a lexical morph meaning “bar”, which also helps to form locative nouns conveying a broad range of meanings, as e.g. in yóuxìbā (game-bā) “amusement arcade” or in yǎnbā (eye-bā), a kind of optometry clinic. We shall show that apparent polysemy may be a consequence of generalization, rather than of specialization in meaning, and that the mechanisms involved in the evolution of derivational affixes are mostly analogous to those of grammaticalisation.
References (21)
Apresjan, Juri D
1974 “Regular Polysemy”.
Linguistics 142.5–32.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2011 “A Construction Morphology Account of Derivation in Mandarin Chinese”.
Morphology 21.89–130.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
2001 Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blank, Andreas
1997 Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, Geert
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurafsky, Daniel
1996 “Universal Tendencies in the Semantics of the Diminutive”.
Language 72:3.533–578.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magni, Elisabetta
2008 “Conservazione e innovazione nella morfologia derivazionale dell’italiano: analisi sincronica e diacronica del suffissoaio”.
Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano: Atti del IX Congresso SILFI, Firenze, 14–17 giugno 2006 ed. by
Emanuela Cresti, 497–506. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz
2005a “Semantic Change in Word Formation”.
Linguistics 43:2.415–441.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz
2005b “Typology, Diachrony, and Universals of Semantic Change in Word-Formation: A Romanist’s Look at the Polysemy of Agent Nouns”.
Morphology and Linguistic Typology.
Online Proceedings of the Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4)
,
Catania
21–23 September 2003
ed. by
Geert Booij,
Emiliano Guevara,
Angela Ralli,
Salvatore Sgroi &
Sergio Scalise, 21–34. Bologna: Università di Bologna.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luschützky, Hans Christian & Franz Rainer
2011 “Agent Noun Polysemy in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective”.
STUF—Language Typology and Universals 64:4.287–338.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rongier, Jacques
2004 Parlons Éwé. Paris: L’Harmattan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scalise, Sergio & Antonietta Bisetto
2008 La struttura delle parole. Bologna: Il Mulino.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scalise, Sergio, Antonietta Bisetto & Emiliano Guevara
2005 “Selection in Compounding and Derivation”.
Morphology and its Demarcations ed. by
Wolfgang Dressler,
Dieter Kastovsky,
Oskar E. Pfeiffer &
Franz Rainer, with the assistance of
Francesco Gardani and
Markus A. Pöchtrager, 133–150. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
XH 2003 = ??????? [The Xinhua Dictionary of New Words
Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Janda, Laura A.
2023.
Polysemy of Affixes. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.