Article published in:
Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 205–222

Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables

| Brock University
| University of Calgary
We report on a psycholinguistic study of semantic transparency among English compound words. We employed the P3 technique (Libben et al. 2012), which combines elements of three experimental paradigms: progressive demasking, naming, and word typing. Both the progressive demasking data and the word typing data showed a graded effect of semantic transparency associated with the number and location of semantically opaque constituents in the compound. Typing duration effects were evident at the constituent boundary, supporting observations first made by Sahel et al. (2008). We suggest that these data point to the value of letter typing durations in the analysis of morphological processing and the importance of a psychocentric perspective on lexical processing – one that emphasizes the psychological nature of morphological structures.
Published online: 27 February 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.14lib
References

References

Aristotle. Poetics
E.M. Edgehill, Translation), retrieved from http://​classics​.mit​.edu/​/Aristotle​/poetics​.html April 5, 2013.
Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas Bates
2008 “Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items”. Journal of Memory and Language 59.390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L.
1973 Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition: A Study in the Empirical, Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of Contemporary Linguistics. London & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorentino, Robert & Ella Fund-Reznicek
2009 “Masked Morphological Priming of Compound Constituents”. The Mental Lexicon 4:2.159–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frisson, Stephen, Elizabeth Niswander-Klement & Alexander Pollatsek
2008 “The Role of Semantic Transparency in the Processing of English Compound Words”. British Journal of Psychology 99.87–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2009 “Constituent Integration during the Processing of Compound Words: Does it Involve the Use of Relational Structures?”. Journal of Memory and Language 60.20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan & Juan Segui
1990 “Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of Lexical Decision and Masked Identification Latencies”. Perception & Psychophysics 47.191–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Hong-bo, Christina Gagné L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2011 “Benefits and Costs of Lexical Decomposition and Semantic Integration during the Processing of Transparent and Opaque English Compounds”. Journal of Memory and Language 65.406–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, Gary
2006 “Why Study Compounds? An Overview of the Issues”. The Representation and Processing of Compound Words ed. by Gary Libben & Gonia Jarema, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “Compounds, Semantic Transparency, and Morphological Transcendence”. New Impulses in Word-Formation ed. by Susan Olsen, 212–232: Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
forthcoming). Compound Fracture and Morphological Superstates.
Libben, Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo-Bom Yoon & Dominiek Sandra
2003 “Compound Fracture: The Role of Semantic Transparency and Morphological Headedness”. Brain and Language 84.26–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, Gary, Silke Weber & Koji Miwa
2012 “P3: A Technique for the Study of Perception, Production, and Participant Properties”. The Mental Lexicon 7:2.237–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, Podraic, Robert Fiorentino & David Poeppel
2008 “Masked Repetition Priming Using Magnetoencephalography”. Brain and Language 106.65–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, Arne
1990 “On the Origins of ‘chopper’, ‘helicopter’ and moped”. American Speech 65:3.278–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sahel, Said, Guido Nottbusch, Angela Grimm & Rüdiger Weingarten
2008 “Written Production of German Compounds: Effects of Lexical Frequency and Semantic Transparency”. Written Language & Literacy 11:2.211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek
1990 “On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes does Not Occur”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42.529–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Rajendra
2006 “Whole Word Morphology”. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edition ed. by Keith Brown, vol. 13, 578–579. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft Marcus & Kenneth I. Forster
1976 “Lexical Storage and Retrieval of Polymorphemic and Polysyllabic Words”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15.607–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Will, Udo, Guido Nottbusch & Rüdiger Weingarten
2006 “Linguistic Units in Word Typing: Effects of Word Presentation Modes and Typing Delay”. Written Language & Literacy 9:1.153–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Pienie
1994 “The Role of Semantic Transparency in the Processing and Representation of Dutch Compounds”. Language and Cognitive Processes 9.341–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
2016. Written production of English compounds: effects of morphology and semantic transparency. Morphology 26:2 ► pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Gahl, Susanne & Ingo Plag
2019. Spelling errors in English derivational suffixes reflect morphological boundary strength. The Mental Lexicon 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Jaswal, Vikram K., Allison Wayne & Hudson Golino
2020. Eye-tracking reveals agency in assisted autistic communication. Scientific Reports 10:1 Crossref logo
Libben, Gary, Kaitlin Curtiss & Silke Weber
2014. Psychocentricity and participant profiles: implications for lexical processing among multilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 5 Crossref logo
Wang, Chuan
2020. Urban village on a global scale: Diverse interpretations of one label. Urban Geography ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.