Cover not available
Part of
Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 303–314

Mimetic verbs and meaning

| Indiana University

This paper will discuss several lexical semantic differences between mimetic verbs and conventional prosaic verbs in Japanese, and show that meaning for mimetic verbs calls for a treatment distinct from that of lexical verbs. Taking into account the notion of ‘affect-imagistic dimension’ (Kita 1997) in which a mimetic base is represented in terms of its images, I will argue that an analysis that incorporates the basic premise of frame semantics and construction grammar can accommodate the seemingly idiosyncratic and unconventional lexical semantic properties of mimetic verbs. The wide range of semantic frames of mimetic verbs is thus fed by the numerous images of the mimetic base and the specific constructions in which they appear.

Published online: 27 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.21tsu
References (30)
Akita, Kimi
2012 “Toward a Frame-Semantic Definition of Sound-Symbolic Words: A Collocational Analysis of Japanese Mimetics”. Cognitive Linguistics 23.67–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apresjan, J. D
1974 “Regular Polysemy”. Linguistics 142.5–32.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1980 “Contextuals”. Language 56.744–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Andrew C
1991 A Thesaurus of Japanese Mimesis and Onomatopoeia: Usage by Categories. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve & Herbert Clark
1979 “When Nouns Surface as Verbs”. Language 55.767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2009 “Connecting Frames and Constructions”. Constructions and Frames 1.7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1977a “Topics in Lexical Semantics”. Current Issues in Linguistics Theory ed. by Peter Cole, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1977b “The Case for Case Reopened”. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8 ed. by Peter Cole & Jerrold Sadock, 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions At Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “Verbs, Constructions, and Semantic Frames”. Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure ed. by Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel, 39–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, Shoko
1998 The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro
2007 “Explorations in the Conceptual Semantics of Mimetic Verbs”. Current Issues in the History and Structures of Japanese ed. by Bijarke Frellesvig, Masayoshi Shibatani & John Charles Smith, 27–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kakehi, Hisao, Ikuhiro Tamori & Lawrence C. Schourup
1996 Trends in Linguistics. Dictionary of Iconic Expressions in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
1997 “Two-Dimensional Analysis of Japanese Mimetics”. Linguistics 35.379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1978 “Structures of the Lexicon and Transfer of Meaning”. Lingua 45.95–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClure, William
2000 Using Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul
2001 “Are Ideophones Really as Weird and Extra- Systematic as Linguists Make Them out to Be?” Ideophones ed. by Christa Kilian-Neinz, 251–258. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B
1996 Sound-Like Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
1998 “Building Verb Meanings”. The Projection of Arguments ed. by Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 “Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 3 ed. by Timothy Shopen, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tamori, Ikuhiro
2002 Onomatope. Gion, Gitaigo o Tanoshimu. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
2003 “Mimetic Verbs as Contextuals”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Linguistic Society of America, Atlanta, January 2003.
2005 “A Constructional Approach to Mimetic Verbs”. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots ed. by Mirjam Fried & Hans C. Boas, 137–154. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007a An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007b “Mimetic Verbs and Innovative Verbs in the Acquisition of Japanese. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31.371–382.Google Scholar
2010 “Onomatope-Dooshi no Imi, Koo-Koozoo no Itikoosatsu”. [On the meaning and argument structure of mimetic verbs]. Kansai Linguistic Society 29.334–343.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko & Stuart Davis
2011 “A Construction Approach to Innovative Verbs in Japanese”. Cognitive Linguistics 22.797–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by 7 other publications

Park, Ji-Yeon
2020. Morphosyntactic integration of ideophones in Japanese and Korean. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17], ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Fidler, Masako U.
2019. Chapter 8. The power of ‘not saying who’ in Czech onomatopoeia. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Murasugi, Keiko
2019. Chapter 10. The structure of mimetic verbs in child and adult Japanese. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Akita, Kimi
2017. The linguistic integration of Japanese ideophones and its typological implications. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:2 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Mattes, Veronika
2017. Iconicity in the lexicon. Studies in Language 41:4 ► pp. 813 ff. DOI logo
AKITA, KIMI & TAKESHI USUKI
2016. A constructional account of the ‘optional’ quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Hiraga, Masako K., William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita
2015. Introduction. In Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 14], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.