Article published in:Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 303–314
Mimetic verbs and meaning
This paper will discuss several lexical semantic differences between mimetic verbs and conventional prosaic verbs in Japanese, and show that meaning for mimetic verbs calls for a treatment distinct from that of lexical verbs. Taking into account the notion of ‘affect-imagistic dimension’ (Kita 1997) in which a mimetic base is represented in terms of its images, I will argue that an analysis that incorporates the basic premise of frame semantics and construction grammar can accommodate the seemingly idiosyncratic and unconventional lexical semantic properties of mimetic verbs. The wide range of semantic frames of mimetic verbs is thus fed by the numerous images of the mimetic base and the specific constructions in which they appear.
Published online: 27 February 2014
Chang, Andrew C.
Kakehi, Hisao, Ikuhiro Tamori & Lawrence C. Schourup
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
2003 “Mimetic Verbs as Contextuals”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Linguistic Society of America, Atlanta, January 2003.
Cited by 7 other publications
AKITA, KIMI & TAKESHI USUKI
Fidler, Masako U.
Hiraga, Masako K., William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.