Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change
Motion Verbs from Latin to Romance
This monograph offers the first in-depth lexical and semantic analysis of motion verbs in their development from Latin to nine Romance languages — Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, Catalan, Occitan, Sardinian, and Raeto-Romance — demonstrating that the patterns of innovation and continuity attested in the data can be accounted for in cognitive linguistic terms. At the same time, the study illustrates how the insights gained from Latin and Romance historical data have profound implications for the cognitive approaches to language — in particular, for Leonard Talmy’s motion-framing typology and George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory. The book should appeal to scholars interested in historical Romance linguistics, cognitive linguistics, and lexical change.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 331] 2015. viii, 261 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 14 March 2015
Published online on 14 March 2015
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface & Acknowledgments | pp. vii–viii
-
Chapter 1. Objectives and key concepts | pp. 1–16
-
Chapter 2. Cognitive onomasiology and cognitive typology of motion encoding | pp. 17–24
-
Chapter 3. Latin and Romance verb biographies | pp. 25–52
-
Chapter 4. Patterns of onomasiological continuity and change from Latin to Romance | pp. 53–88
-
Chapter 5. Cognitive semasiology and conceptual metaphor theory | pp. 89–100
-
Chapter 6. Semantic continuity and loss from Latin to Romance | pp. 101–148
-
Chapter 7. Romance innovative semantic developments | pp. 149–168
-
Chapter 8. Implications for the cognitive typology of motion encoding | pp. 169–190
-
Chapter 9. Implications for the conceptual metaphor theory | pp. 191–198
-
Chapter 10. Conclusions | pp. 199–208
-
-
Index of languages and language families | pp. 255–256
-
Index of subjects and terms | pp. 257–261
“Insgesamt liegt mit der vorliegenden Arbeit eine detailgenaue und gleichzeitig sehr klar strukturierte Studie vor, in der die umfassende Forschungsliteratur zu den untersuchten Phänomenen im Lateinischen und den romanischen Sprachen aufgearbeitet und die Phänomene gleichzeitig ausgehend von neueren theoretischen Ansätzen teilweise neu interpretiert werden. Der von der Vf. gesetzte Anspruch, ausgehend von den gut dokumentierten Wandelprozessen im Übergang vom Lateinischen zu den romanischen Sprachen neue Erkenntnisse von allgemeiner theoretischer Relevanz und Perspektiven für weiterführende Studien zu gewinnen, wird hierdurch überzeugend eingelöst.”
Esme Winter-Froemel,
University of Trier
, Romanische Forschungen 129 (2017)
“[A] wonderful and unmissable piece of high-quality work. Thanks to Stolova’s expertise in both (Romance) historical linguistics and Cognitive Linguistics, the book brings together two research perspectives that should have never been apart when discussing semantics (both forms and meanings). The book is clearly organised, beautifully written, and well-informed. It contains zillions of (glossed) illustrative examples as well as new explanations and much-needed clarifications on long-standing wrong assumptions about motion event typologies. [...] A any researcher working in these general domains – historical linguistics, Cognitive Linguistics, Romance languages – should read this book. [...] This book is also a ‘must’ for any researcher interested in motion events.”
Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, University of Zaragoza, in Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18:1 (2020)
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
Mahmood, Safiya Shakir
Percillier, Michael, Yela Schauwecker, Achim Stein & Carola Trips
Piccione, Mariapaola, Thomas Rainsford, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Montébran, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux, G. Merminod & G. Philippe
Feng, Luoyin, Jize Du, Chong Fu & Wei Song
Garachana Camarero, Mar, Sandra Montserrat Buendia & Claus Dieter Pusch
2022. From verbal periphrases to complex predicates. In From Verbal Periphrases to Complex Predicates [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 31], ► pp. 1 ff.
Florio, Nicola
Kaneeva, Anna, Tatyana Bagdasaryan, D. Rudoy, A. Olshevskaya & N. Ugrekhelidze
Buoniconto, Alfonsina
Aurnague, Michel & Dejan Stosic
2019. Recent advances in the study of motion in French. In The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 66], ► pp. 2 ff.
Fabre, Alain
Iacobini, Claudio
Pomino, Natascha & Eva‐Maria Remberger
Shi, Wenlei, Wanglong Yang & Henghua Su
2018. The typological change of motion expressions in Chinese revisited. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 847 ff.
Fitzmaurice, Susan, Justyna A. Robinson, Marc Alexander, Iona C. Hine, Seth Mehl & Fraser Dallachy
2017. Reading into the past. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 53 ff.
Iacobini, Claudio, Luisa Corona, Noemi De Pasquale & Alfonsina Buoniconto
2017. How should a “classical” Satellite-Framed Language behave?. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 95 ff.
Kopecka, Anetta
2017. Source-oriented and Goal-oriented events in Old and Modern French. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 305 ff.
Mateu, Jaume
2017. State and change of state in Latin. In Boundaries, phases, and interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 239], ► pp. 343 ff.
Mateu, Jaume
Nuti, Andrea
2016. A matter of perspective. In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174], ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFF: Historical & comparative linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General