Cover not available
Part of
Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 51–74

On Light Nouns

| Roma Tre University
| University of Bologna

This paper investigates the hypothesis that word classes are not homogeneous, but rather complex sets of entities with (partially) different properties that can be arranged along a scale. Whereas much work has been done on subclasses of verbs, and on scales of ‘verbiness’ (e.g., full-fledged verbs vs. verbs with a grammatical function), less attention has been paid to scales of ‘nouniness’. This paper focuses on a set of nouns – called ‘Light Nouns’ here – that occur as N1 in binominal constructions of the N1 of N2 type in languages such as Italian, English, and French. In this position Light Nouns tend to lose their lexical content and take on a more grammatical meaning that serves to modify N2. We discuss various types of Light Nouns (among which Taxonomic Nouns, Approximators, Quantifiers, and Support Nouns), measure their referentiality according to a set of parameters, and finally rank them along a scale.

Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.04sim
References
Aarts, Bas
1998 “Binominal Noun Phrases in English”. Transactions of the Philological Society 96:1.117–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2003 Classifiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian & Adrienne Lehrer
1976 “NP-like Quantifiers and the Problem of Determining the Head of an NP”. Linguistic Analysis 2:4.395–413.Google Scholar
Allen, Margaret R
1978 Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Ct.Google Scholar
Anward, Jan, Edith A. Moravcsik & Leon Stassen
1997 “Parts of Speech: A challenge for typology”. Linguistic Typology 1.167–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994 Morphology by Itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris & David Dowty
1993 “Non Verbal Thematic Proto-Roles”. Proceedings of NELS 23 ed. by Amy Schafer, 49–62. Amherst: GSLA.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan & Graeme Hirst
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007 “Inflectional Morphology”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
2003 “Nom et verbe dans l’opposition entre oral de conversation et écrit informatif”. Nom et verbe: catégorisation et référence ed. by Cécile Brion & Eric Castagne, 35–61. Reims: Presses Universitaires de Reims.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
2006 Diccionario combinatorio práctico del español contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2003 “Measure Noun Constructions: An instance of semantically-driven grammaticalization”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8:2.283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N
1977 “A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural”. Linguistics and Philosophy 1.413–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
1991 On Definiteness: A study with special reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
2007 “Gender and Noun Classes”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 241–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko & Éva Dékány
This volume. “Hungarian is a classifier language��.�
Deacon, Terrence W
2003 “Universal Grammar and Semiotic Constraints”. Language Evolution ed. by Morten H. Christiansen & Simon Kirby, 111–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2002 “History of the Sort of Construction Family”. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG2), Helsinki, 6–8 September 2002.
2005 “The Grammaticalisation of sort of, kind of and type of in English”. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, Santiago de Compostela, 17–20 July 2005.
Ferretti, Francesco
2010 Alle origini del linguaggio umano. Bari & Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio
2000 “On the Interaction between Morphology and Semantics: The Italian suffix -ata ”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47:1–4.205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, Gaston
1984 “Étude syntaxique de deux emplois de mot coup ”. Lingvisticae Investigationes 8:1.37–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 “Classes d’objets et description des verbes”. Langages 115.15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F
1960 “The Origin of Speech”. Scientific American 203.88–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1984 “The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar”. Language 60.703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul
1997 “The kind of / sort of Constructions”. Words and the Meaning of Context by Paul Kay, 145–158. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lauwers, Peter
This volume. “Between Adjective and Noun: Category / Function mismatch, constructional overrides and coercion”.
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca
2009 “Phrasal Lexemes, Compounds and Phrases: A constructionist perspective”. Word Structure 2:2.254–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Binominal Constructions in Italian of the N-di-N Type: Towards a typology of light noun constructions”. Paper presented at the Workshop on Binominal Syntagms as a Neglected Locus of Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change: Towards a unified approach, SLE 43, Vilnius, 2–5 September 2010.
2012 Parole sintagmatiche in italiano. Roma: Caissa Italia.Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2007 “The Construction of Vagueness: ‘Sort-of’ expressions in Romance Languages”. Aspects of Meaning Construction ed. by Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund, 225–245. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noailly, Michèle
1990 Le substantif épithète. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1995 “Transfers of Meaning”. Journal of Semantics 12.109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey & Annie Zaenen
1992 “Systematic Polysemy in Lexicology and Lexicography”. Proceedings of Euralex II ed. by Hannu Tommola, Krista Varantola, Tarja Salmi-Tolonen & Jürgen Schopp, 387–396. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English
2002 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum
1973 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Récanati, François
2008 Philosophie du langage (et de l’esprit). Paris: Folio Gallimard.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1973 “Nouniness”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Research ed. by Osamu Fujimura, 137–257. Tokyo: TEC Company.Google Scholar
Rouget, Christine
2000 Distribution et sémantique des constructions nom de nom. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2001 “Scales between Nouniness and Verbiness”. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible, vol. I, 495–509. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Timothy Shopen
2007 “Parts-of-Speech Systems”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume I: Clause Structure ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 1–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2003 “ Maṣdar, ’ismu al-marrati et la frontière verbe/nom”. Estudios ofrecidos al Profesor José Jesús de Bustos Tovar ed. by José Luis Girón Alconchel, Silvia Iglesias Recuero, Francisco Javier Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga & Antonio Narbona, vol. I, 901–918. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele & Francesca Masini
2009 “Support Nouns and Verbal Features: A case study from Italian. Verbum 29:1/2.143–172.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney
1994 “The Gradual Development of Degree Modifier sort of and kind of ”. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Katherine Beals, Gina Cooke, David Kathman, Karl-Erik McCullough, Sotaro Kita & David Testen, 451–465. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959 Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008 The Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2007 “The Concepts of Constructional Mismatch and Type-Shifting from the Perspective of Grammaticalization”. Cognitive Linguistics 18:4.523–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns”. Constructions and Language Change ed. by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 23–45. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967 “Verbs and Times”. Linguistics in Philosophy by Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam
2013 “A Case Study on the Relationship between Grammatical Change and Synchronic Variation: The emergence of tipo [-N] in Italian”. Synchrony and Diachrony: A dynamic interface ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli, 283–311. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1985 “Heads”. Journal of Linguistics 21.1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cominetti, Federica & Raffaele Simone
2017. Encoding dot-like events in Modern Standard Chinese. Language Sciences 62 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Csirmaz, Anikó & Éva Dékány
2014. Hungarian is a classifier language. In Word Classes [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 332], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Piunno, Valentina
2020. Partially filled constructions in some Romance languages. Schematicity and semantic predictability. Romanica Olomucensia 32:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.