Cover not available
Part of
Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 51–74

On Light Nouns

| Roma Tre University
| University of Bologna
This paper investigates the hypothesis that word classes are not homogeneous, but rather complex sets of entities with (partially) different properties that can be arranged along a scale. Whereas much work has been done on subclasses of verbs, and on scales of ‘verbiness’ (e.g., full-fledged verbs vs. verbs with a grammatical function), less attention has been paid to scales of ‘nouniness’. This paper focuses on a set of nouns – called ‘Light Nouns’ here – that occur as N1 in binominal constructions of the N1 of N2 type in languages such as Italian, English, and French. In this position Light Nouns tend to lose their lexical content and take on a more grammatical meaning that serves to modify N2. We discuss various types of Light Nouns (among which Taxonomic Nouns, Approximators, Quantifiers, and Support Nouns), measure their referentiality according to a set of parameters, and finally rank them along a scale.
Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.04sim
References (56)
Aarts, Bas. 1998. “Binominal Noun Phrases in English”. Transactions of the Philological Society 96:1.117–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. Classifiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian & Adrienne Lehrer. 1976. “NP-like Quantifiers and the Problem of Determining the Head of an NP”. Linguistic Analysis 2:4.395–413.Google Scholar
Allen, Margaret R. 1978. Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Ct.Google Scholar
Anward, Jan, Edith A. Moravcsik & Leon Stassen. 1997. “Parts of Speech: A challenge for typology”. Linguistic Typology 1.167–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris & David Dowty. 1993. “Non Verbal Thematic Proto-Roles”. Proceedings of NELS 23 ed. by Amy Schafer, 49–62. Amherst: GSLA.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan & Graeme Hirst. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. “Inflectional Morphology”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2003. “Nom et verbe dans l’opposition entre oral de conversation et écrit informatif”. Nom et verbe: catégorisation et référence ed. by Cécile Brion & Eric Castagne, 35–61. Reims: Presses Universitaires de Reims.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 2006. Diccionario combinatorio práctico del español contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2003. “Measure Noun Constructions: An instance of semantically-driven grammaticalization”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8:2.283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N. 1977. “A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural”. Linguistics and Philosophy 1.413–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 1991. On Definiteness: A study with special reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2007. “Gender and Noun Classes”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 241–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko & Éva Dékány. This volume. “Hungarian is a classifier language��.�
Deacon, Terrence W. 2003. “Universal Grammar and Semiotic Constraints”. Language Evolution ed. by Morten H. Christiansen & Simon Kirby, 111–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 2002. “History of the Sort of Construction Family”. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG2), Helsinki, 6–8 September 2002.
. 2005. “The Grammaticalisation of sort of, kind of and type of in English”. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, Santiago de Compostela, 17–20 July 2005.
Ferretti, Francesco. 2010. Alle origini del linguaggio umano. Bari & Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 2000. “On the Interaction between Morphology and Semantics: The Italian suffix -ata ”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47:1–4.205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, Gaston. 1984. “Étude syntaxique de deux emplois de mot coup ”. Lingvisticae Investigationes 8:1.37–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “Classes d’objets et description des verbes”. Langages 115.15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1960. “The Origin of Speech”. Scientific American 203.88–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1984. “The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar”. Language 60.703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul. 1997. “The kind of / sort of Constructions”. Words and the Meaning of Context by Paul Kay, 145–158. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lauwers, Peter. This volume. “Between Adjective and Noun: Category / Function mismatch, constructional overrides and coercion”.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca. 2009. “Phrasal Lexemes, Compounds and Phrases: A constructionist perspective”. Word Structure 2:2.254–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Binominal Constructions in Italian of the N-di-N Type: Towards a typology of light noun constructions”. Paper presented at the Workshop on Binominal Syntagms as a Neglected Locus of Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change: Towards a unified approach, SLE 43, Vilnius, 2–5 September 2010.
. 2012. Parole sintagmatiche in italiano. Roma: Caissa Italia.Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2007. “The Construction of Vagueness: ‘Sort-of’ expressions in Romance Languages”. Aspects of Meaning Construction ed. by Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund, 225–245. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noailly, Michèle. 1990. Le substantif épithète. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1995. “Transfers of Meaning”. Journal of Semantics 12.109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey & Annie Zaenen. 1992. “Systematic Polysemy in Lexicology and Lexicography”. Proceedings of Euralex II ed. by Hannu Tommola, Krista Varantola, Tarja Salmi-Tolonen & Jürgen Schopp, 387–396. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English. 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum. 1973. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 2008. Philosophie du langage (et de l’esprit). Paris: Folio Gallimard.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1973. “Nouniness”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Research ed. by Osamu Fujimura, 137–257. Tokyo: TEC Company.Google Scholar
Rouget, Christine. 2000. Distribution et sémantique des constructions nom de nom. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. “Scales between Nouniness and Verbiness”. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible, vol. I, 495–509. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Timothy Shopen. 2007. “Parts-of-Speech Systems”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume I: Clause Structure ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 1–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 2003. “ Maṣdar, ’ismu al-marrati et la frontière verbe/nom”. Estudios ofrecidos al Profesor José Jesús de Bustos Tovar ed. by José Luis Girón Alconchel, Silvia Iglesias Recuero, Francisco Javier Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga & Antonio Narbona, vol. I, 901–918. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele & Francesca Masini. 2009. “Support Nouns and Verbal Features: A case study from Italian. Verbum 29:1/2.143–172.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney. 1994. “The Gradual Development of Degree Modifier sort of and kind of ”. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Katherine Beals, Gina Cooke, David Kathman, Karl-Erik McCullough, Sotaro Kita & David Testen, 451–465. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. The Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2007. “The Concepts of Constructional Mismatch and Type-Shifting from the Perspective of Grammaticalization”. Cognitive Linguistics 18:4.523–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns”. Constructions and Language Change ed. by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 23–45. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. “Verbs and Times”. Linguistics in Philosophy by Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2013. “A Case Study on the Relationship between Grammatical Change and Synchronic Variation: The emergence of tipo [-N] in Italian”. Synchrony and Diachrony: A dynamic interface ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli, 283–311. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. “Heads”. Journal of Linguistics 21.1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Meulleman, Machteld & Katia Paykin
2023. Chapter 3. Impersonal existence in the weather domain. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Piunno, Valentina
2020. Partially filled constructions in some Romance languages. Schematicity and semantic predictability. Romanica Olomucensia 32:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Cominetti, Federica & Raffaele Simone
2017. Encoding dot-like events in Modern Standard Chinese. Language Sciences 62 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Csirmaz, Anikó & Éva Dékány
2014. Hungarian is a classifier language. In Word Classes [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 332], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.