Hungarian is a classifier language
We present an overview of classifiers, a subgroup of what Simone & Masini (this volume) call Light Nouns. Three major types have been distinguished: group, sortal and mensural classifiers. Focusing on group and sortal classifiers, we establish a battery of tests which diagnose the membership in the appropriate classifier subgroup. It is argued that some of the tests established have universal validity, while the applicability of others depends on language-specific factors. The tests are called upon to support the claim that Hungarian is a classifier language. We show that Hungarian has the hallmarks of a classifier language indeed, which warrants a treatment similar to the more familiar Southeast Asian classifier languages. As for the category of sortal and group classifiers, it is suggested that while the sortal classifiers represent a functional category in the extended projection of the noun, the group classifiers are nouns themselves that take an optional nominal complement. Finally, we show how the distributional differences between sortal and group classifiers fall out from this proposal.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2000 Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Allan, Keith
1977 “Classifiers”.
Language 53.285–311.


Beckwith, Christopher I
1992 “
Classifiers in Hungarian”.
Approaches to Hungarian 4: The structure of Hungarian ed. by
István Kenesei &
Csaba Pléh, 197–206. Szeged: JATE.

Beckwith, Christopher I
2007 Phoronyms: Classifiers, class nouns and the pseudopartitive construction. New York: Peter Lang.

Borer, Hagit
2005 In Name Only (
= Structuring Sense 1). New York: Oxford University Press.

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Rint Sybesma
1998 “Yi-wan Tang, Yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and massifiers”.
Tsing-Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28.385–412.

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Rint Sybesma
1999 “Bare and Not-so-bare Nouns and the Structure of NP”.
Linguistic Inquiry 30.509–542.


Cinque, Guglielmo
1994 “
On the Evidence for Partial N-movement in the Romance DP”.
Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne ed. by
Guglielmo Cinque,
Jan Koster,
Jean-Yves Pollock,
Luigi Rizzi &
Raffaella Zanuttini, 85–110. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo
2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads. (
= The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4) New York: Oxford University Press.

Dékány, Éva & Aniko Csirmaz
2010 “
Classifiers and the Functional Structure in DPs”. Paper presented at FU11: Universal Grammar and the Syntax of Finno-Ugric Languages Workshop, Piliscsaba (Hungary), August 2010.
Farkas, Donka & Henriëtte de Swart
2003 The Semantics of Incorporation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Gil, David
2008 “
Numeral Classifiers”.
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online ed. by
Martin Haspelmath,
Matthew S. Dryer,
David Gil &
Bernard Comrie, Chapter 55. Max Planck Digital Library.

Goral, Donald R
1979 “Numeral Classifier Systems: A Southeast Asian cross-linguistic analysis”.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 4.1–72.

Greenberg, Joseph H
1972 “Numeral Classifiers and Substantival Number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type”.
Working Papers on Language Universals 9.1–39.

Grinevald, Colette
2000 “
A Morphosyntactic Typology of Classifiers”.
Systems of Nominal Classification ed. by
Gunter Senft, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hundius, Harald and Ulrike Kölver
Lee, Iskop & Robert Ramsey
2000 The Korean Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
1994 Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.

Rijkhoff, Jan
2002 The Noun Phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Scott, Gary J
2002 “
Stacked Adjectival Modification and the Structure of Nominal Phrases”.
Functional Structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structrures ed. by
Guglielmo Cinque, 91–120. New York: Oxford University Press.

Simone, Raffaele & Francesca Masini
This volume. “
On Light Nouns”.
Sproat, Richard & Chilin Shih
1991 “
The Cross-linguistic Distribution of Adjective Ordering Restrictions”.
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda ed. by
Carol Georgopoulos &
Roberta Ishihara, 565–593. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.


Wiltschko, Martina
2012 “
Decomposing the Mass/Count Distinction. Evidence from languages that lack it”.
Count and Mass across languages ed. by
Diane Massam, 120–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL]
Zavala, Roberto
2000 “
Multiple Classifier Systems in Akatek Mayan”.
Systems of Nominal Classification ed. by
Gunter Senft, 114–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, Hong
2007 “Numeral Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese”.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16.43–59.


Zhang, Niina Ning
2009a “
Counting Unit Words as Nominal Auxiliaries”. Ms., National Chung Cheng Univesity. Available from
[URL]
Zhang, Niina Ning
2009b “
Syntactic Properties of Numeral Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese”. Proceedings of the 2009 Summer Conference of the International Society for Chomskyan Studies, 93–108. Seoul: The International Society for Chomskyan Studies.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Dékány, Éva
2015.
The syntax of anaphoric possessives in Hungarian.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33:4
► pp. 1121 ff.

2021.
The Functional Sequence up to QP. In
The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100],
► pp. 15 ff.

Halm, Tamás
2021.
Radically Truncated Clauses in Hungarian and Beyond: Evidence for the Fine Structure of the Minimal VP.
Syntax 24:3
► pp. 376 ff.

Her, One-Soon, Harald Hammarström & Marc Allassonnière-Tang
2022.
Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world.
Linguistics Vanguard 8:1
► pp. 151 ff.

Holz, Christoph
Rothstein, Susan
2020.
Count Nouns vs Mass Nouns. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics,
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.