Weight effects across verbal domains
The case of Spanish subjects
Abundant research reports that weight affects the position of postverbal constituents (Hawkins 2004; Wasow 1997, 2002; Wasow & Arnold 2003). Weight has been analyzed both as a constraint on production and processing. Our study analyzes whether increasing weight can shift subject position, which is typically preverbal, to the postverbal domain. We focus on Spanish subjects with unaccusative and emission verbs, because they display similar percentages of preverbal and postverbal occurrences. Our sample corpus was extracted from the Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual (CREA). Data was coded as nominal and scalar data in order to compare the validity of the different methodologies adopted by Hawkins (1994) and Gries (2003) respectively. In addition, we investigate which is the most descriptive weight unit: word (Lohse, Hawkins & Wasow 2004), syllable (Gries 2003), or phoneme. Our results indicate that weight is a statistically significant factor in subject placement.
References
Burzio, Luigi
1981 Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.


Chomsky, Noam
1975 The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dowty, David
1991 “
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection”.
Language 67.547–619.


Gries, Stefan T.
1999 “
Particle Movement: A cognitive and functional approach”.
Cognitive Linguistics 10.105–45.


Gries, Stefan T.
2003 Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A study of particle placement. New York: Continuum.

Hawkins, John A.
1994 A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawkins, John A.
2000 “
The Relative Order of Prepositional Phrases in English: Going beyond manner–place–time”.
Language Variation and Change 11.231–266.

Hawkins, John A.
2004 Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Hawkins, John A.
2009 “
Language Universals and the Performance-Grammar Correspondence Hypothesis”.
Language Universals ed. by
Morten H. Christiansen, Christopher Collins &
Shimon Edelman, 54–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Lipski, John M.
1977 “
Preposed Subjects in Questions: Some considerations”.
Hispania 60:1.61–67.


Lohse, Barbara, John A. Hawkins & Thomas A. Wasow
2004 “
Domain Minimization in English Verb-Particle Constructions”.
Language 80.238–61.


Mayoral Hernández, Roberto
Mayoral Hernández, Roberto
2008 “
A Typological Approach to the Ordering of Adverbials: Weight, argumenthood and EPP”.
A New Relay on Linguistics ed. by
Asier Alcázar,
Irene Barberia,
Rebeka Campos Astorkiza &
Susana Huidobro.
Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 39:2.141–159. Universidad del País Vasco.

Mayoral Hernández, Roberto & Asier Alcázar
2011 “
A Study of Weight and Subject Position in Spanish”.
Rasegna Italiana de Linguistica Applicata, Anno XLIII 1–2.355–366.

Mcdonald, Janet L., J. Kathryn Bock & Michael Kelly
1993 “
Word and World Order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position”.
Cognitive Psychology 25.188–230.


Mendikoetxea, Amaya
2000 “
Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas”.
Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española ed. by
Ignacio Bosque &
Violeta Demonte, vol. II, 1575–1629. Madrid: Espasa.

Perlmutter, David
1978 “
Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis”.
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4.157–189.

Poplack, Shana
1980 “
Deletion and Disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish”.
Language 56.371–385.


Prince, Ellen F.
1981 “
Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information”.
Radical Pragmatics ed. by
Peter Cole, 223–256. New York: Academic Press.

Real Academia Española, Banco de datos (CREA) online
Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. [
[URL]].
Rosenbach, Anette
2005 “
Animacy Versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English”.
Language 81.613–44.


Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
1994 Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sorace, Antonella
2000 “
Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs”.
Language 76.859–890.


Thompson, Sandra A.
1990 “
Information Flow and Dative Shift in English Discourse”.
Development and Diversity: Language variation across time and space ed. by
Jerold A. Edmondson,
Crawford Feagin &
Peter Mühlhäusler, 239–253. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.

Wasow, Thomas A.
1997 “
Remarks on Grammatical Weight”.
Language Variation and Change 9.81–105.


Wasow, Thomas A.
2002 Postverbal Behavior. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.

Wasow, Thomas A. & Jennifer Arnold
2003 “
Post-Verbal Constituent Ordering in English”.
Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English ed. by
Günter Rohdenburg &
Britta Mondorf, 119–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Cerrón-Palomino, Álvaro & Rosti Vana
2022.
Tracking subject position change in U.S. Southwest Spanish: what 19th and 20th century Tucson newspapers tell us.
Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:2
► pp. 269 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.