Cover not available
Part of
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 173–198

Polarity fronting in Romanian and Sardinian

| Institutul de Lingvistica al Academiei Române “Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti”
| Universität Wien
We argue that some word order phenomena in Romanian and Sardinian are the result of a checking operation in the left periphery involving verum focus (i.e., focus on the polarity component of the sentence). In particular, this operation accounts for some word order patterns found in polar questions. In Romanian, polarity fronting is realized as head-movement of (V+)T+Σ to a higher peripheral head which bears a Focus-probe, which we identify as Fin. This licenses VS orders for predications in which VS is not allowed as a neutral order (i-level predicates, iteratives, generics). In Sardinian, an entire phrase headed by the lexical predicate (verbal non-finite form or non-verbal predicate) is fronted before the auxiliary. We argue that this order is obtained by two movement operations, head-raising of (V+)T+Σ to Foc and movement of the predicate phrase to SpecFoc. We also present the semantics of polarity focus, distinguishing several types of focus (informational, emphatic, contrastive).
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.13giu
References (62)
References
Alboiu, Gabriela. 2002. The Features of Movement in Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. “Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and the EPP-checking”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Ana Maria. 1999. “Complexul verbal”. Studii şi Cercetări Lingvistice, L:1.39–84.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 1986. La lingua sarda contemporanea. Grammatica del logudorese e del campidanese. Norma e varieta´ dell ’ uso. Sintesi storica. Cagliari: Della Torre.Google Scholar
. 1994. Ello ellus: Grammatica sarda. Nuoro: Poliedro.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1990. “Some Remarks on the Focus Field in Hungarian”. UCL Working Papers 2.201–25.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. “Towards a Cartography of Subject Positions”. The Structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures II ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 115–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. “On a (Wh-)Moved Topic in Italian, Compared to Germanic”. Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer, 3–40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattell, Ray. 1973. “Negative Transportation and Tag Questions”. Language 41.612–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries”. Step by Step: Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale. A life in language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 1982. “Conducive Questions”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 27.99–106.Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Double Subject Construction in Romanian. Notes on the syntax of the subject”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 42.101–147.Google Scholar
Devine, A.M. & Laurence D. Stevens. 2006. Latin Word Order: Structured meaning and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1994. The Syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Head-to-Head Merge in Balkan subjunctives and Locality”. Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages ed. by Angela Ralli & María Luisa Rivero, 44–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann. 2003. “Rethinking the Tobler-Mussafia Law. Data from Old Catalan”. Diachronica 20.259–288 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floricic, Franck. 2004. “Négation et interrogation en sarde”. Paper presented at “Colloque Typologie des langues, universaux linguistiques: La négation et les énoncés non susceptibles d’être niés”. TYPO 4. Institut Universitaire de France.
. 2009. “Negation and ‘Focus Clash’ in Sardinian”. Information Structure and its Interfaces ed. by Lunella Mereu, 129–152. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2000. “Agreement is Feature Sharing”. Ms., Northeastern University.
http://www.math.neu.edu/ling/pdffiles/agrisfs.pdf.
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2006. “How Sentences Grow in the Mind: Agreement and selection in an efficient minimalist syntax”. Agreement Systems ed. by Cedric Boeckx, 121–157. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion. 2011. “The Romanian Verbal Cluster and the Theory of Head Movement”. Romance Linguistics 2010. Selected papers from the 40th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL40), Seattle, Washington, March 2010 ed. by Julia Herschensohn, 271–286. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2009. “Postverbal Subjects in Romance Null-Subject Languages: Information-structural conditions and variation”. Paper presented at Going Romance, Nice, 3–5 December.
. 2012. “Zur informations-strukturellen Konfiguration und Variation postverbaler Subjekte in den romanischen Null-Subjekt-Sprachen”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31.43–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. 1974. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. “Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language 10.41–53.Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia. 2002. “Adhering Focus”. Linguistic Inquiry 33.164–172 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Discourse Markers in Interrogative Clauses”. Balkanistica 16. 71–96.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Stylistic Inversion in Romanian”. Studia linguistica 60.156–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. 1992. “Über Verum Fokus in Deutschen”. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 4.112–141.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1985. “Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity”. Language 61.121–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan. 1988. “Auxiliary Verbs in Sardinian”. Transactions of the Philological Society 86.173–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. “Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates”. The Generic Book ed. by Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. “Basic Notions of Information Structure”. Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure 6 ed. by Caroline Fery & Manfred Krifka, WP SFB 632: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Laka, Miren Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lepori, Antoni. 2001. Gramàtiga sarda po is campidanesus: duas obras in d-unu libru. Compendio di grammatica campidanese per italofoni. Quartu Sant’Elena: Ed. C.R.Google Scholar
López, Luis. 2008. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido. 2009. “Defective Probes? (No) agreement and (no) movement in Romance”. Paper presented at the Movement and Morphology Workshop at Leucorea, Wittenberg.
Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2010a. “La periferia sinistra romanza: topicalizzazione, focalizzazione e interrogazione in sardo”. Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes VII ed. by M. Iliescu, H. Siller-Runggaldier & P. Danler, 189–197. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Focus Fronting and the Left Periphery in Sardinian”. Syntactic Variation: The dialects of Italy ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Ian Roberts & Adam Ledgeway 261–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT..
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features”. Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinto, Manuela. 1997. Licensing and Interpretation of Inverted Subjects in Italian. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Pittau, Massimo. 1972. Grammatica del sardo-nuorese: il più conservativo dei parlari neolatini. Bologna: Patron.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Jean-Yves Pollock. 2004. “On the Left Periphery of some Romance Wh-questions”. The Structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures II ed. by Luigi. Rizzi, 251–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2006. “Subject Clitics and Complex Inversion”. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, Vol. 4, 601–659. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2010. “Left-peripheral Interactions in Sardinian”. Lingua 120.555–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. Elements of Grammar ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “On the Form of Chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects”. Wh-Movement: Moving on ed. by Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, incorporation and defective goals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Chung-Hye Han. 2002. “Verum Focus in Negative Yes/No Questions and Ladd’s p /¬p Ambiguity”. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XII ed. by Brendan Jackson, 204–224. ITHACA, NY.: CLC Publications.
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. “Givenness, AvoidF and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent”. Natural Language Semantics 7.141–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2007. The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University.
Soare, Gabriela. 2009. The Syntax-Information Structure Interface: A comparative view from Romanian. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Genève..
Tortora, Christina M. 2001. “Evidence for a Null Locative in Italian”. Current Issues in Italian Syntax ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi, 313–326. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Rafaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Giurgea, Ion
2021. Verum focus and Romanian polar questions. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger
2019. The dialects of Italy at the interfaces. In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mensching, Guido
2016. Yes/no interrogatives and focus in Sardinian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.