Cover not available
Part of
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 173–198

Polarity fronting in Romanian and Sardinian

| Institutul de Lingvistica al Academiei Române “Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti”
| Universität Wien
We argue that some word order phenomena in Romanian and Sardinian are the result of a checking operation in the left periphery involving verum focus (i.e., focus on the polarity component of the sentence). In particular, this operation accounts for some word order patterns found in polar questions. In Romanian, polarity fronting is realized as head-movement of (V+)T+Σ to a higher peripheral head which bears a Focus-probe, which we identify as Fin. This licenses VS orders for predications in which VS is not allowed as a neutral order (i-level predicates, iteratives, generics). In Sardinian, an entire phrase headed by the lexical predicate (verbal non-finite form or non-verbal predicate) is fronted before the auxiliary. We argue that this order is obtained by two movement operations, head-raising of (V+)T+Σ to Foc and movement of the predicate phrase to SpecFoc. We also present the semantics of polarity focus, distinguishing several types of focus (informational, emphatic, contrastive).
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.13giu
References
Alboiu, Gabriela
2002 The Features of Movement in Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
1998 “Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and the EPP-checking”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Ana Maria
1999 “Complexul verbal”. Studii şi Cercetări Lingvistice, L:1.39–84.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
1986 La lingua sarda contemporanea. Grammatica del logudorese e del campidanese. Norma e varieta´ dell ’ uso. Sintesi storica. Cagliari: Della Torre.Google Scholar
1994 Ello ellus: Grammatica sarda. Nuoro: Poliedro.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael
1990 “Some Remarks on the Focus Field in Hungarian”. UCL Working Papers 2.201–25.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2004 “Towards a Cartography of Subject Positions”. The Structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures II ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 115–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “On a (Wh-)Moved Topic in Italian, Compared to Germanic”. Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer, 3–40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattell, Ray
1973 “Negative Transportation and Tag Questions”. Language 41.612–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries”. Step by Step: Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale. A life in language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra
1982 “Conducive Questions”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 27.99–106.Google Scholar
1997 “The Double Subject Construction in Romanian. Notes on the syntax of the subject”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 42.101–147.Google Scholar
Devine, A.M. & Laurence D. Stevens
2006 Latin Word Order: Structured meaning and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1994 The Syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Head-to-Head Merge in Balkan subjunctives and Locality”. Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages ed. by Angela Ralli & María Luisa Rivero, 44–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1972 Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1997 The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann
2003 “Rethinking the Tobler-Mussafia Law. Data from Old Catalan”. Diachronica 20.259–288 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floricic, Franck
2004 “Négation et interrogation en sarde”. Paper presented at “Colloque Typologie des langues, universaux linguistiques: La négation et les énoncés non susceptibles d’être niés”. TYPO 4. Institut Universitaire de France.
2009 “Negation and ‘Focus Clash’ in Sardinian”. Information Structure and its Interfaces ed. by Lunella Mereu, 129–152. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann
2000 “Agreement is Feature Sharing”. Ms., Northeastern University.
http://www.math.neu.edu/ling/pdffiles/agrisfs.pdf
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann
2006 “How Sentences Grow in the Mind: Agreement and selection in an efficient minimalist syntax”. Agreement Systems ed. by Cedric Boeckx, 121–157. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion
2011 “The Romanian Verbal Cluster and the Theory of Head Movement”. Romance Linguistics 2010. Selected papers from the 40th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL40), Seattle, Washington, March 2010 ed. by Julia Herschensohn, 271–286. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion & Eva-Maria Remberger
2009 “Postverbal Subjects in Romance Null-Subject Languages: Information-structural conditions and variation”. Paper presented at Going Romance, Nice, 3–5 December.
2012 “Zur informations-strukturellen Konfiguration und Variation postverbaler Subjekte in den romanischen Null-Subjekt-Sprachen”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31.43–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1974 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.
Hamblin, Charles L.
1973 “Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language 10.41–53.Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2002 “Adhering Focus”. Linguistic Inquiry 33.164–172 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Discourse Markers in Interrogative Clauses”. Balkanistica 16. 71–96.Google Scholar
2006 “Stylistic Inversion in Romanian”. Studia linguistica 60.156–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1992 “Über Verum Fokus in Deutschen”. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 4.112–141.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1985 “Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity”. Language 61.121–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1988 “Auxiliary Verbs in Sardinian”. Transactions of the Philological Society 86.173–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1995 “Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates”. The Generic Book ed. by Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007 “Basic Notions of Information Structure”. Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure 6 ed. by Caroline Fery & Manfred Krifka, WP SFB 632: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Laka, Miren Itziar
1990 Negation in Syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lepori, Antoni
2001 Gramàtiga sarda po is campidanesus: duas obras in d-unu libru. Compendio di grammatica campidanese per italofoni. Quartu Sant’Elena: Ed. C.R.Google Scholar
López, Luis
2008 A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido
2009 “Defective Probes? (No) agreement and (no) movement in Romance”. Paper presented at the Movement and Morphology Workshop at Leucorea, Wittenberg.
Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger
2010a “La periferia sinistra romanza: topicalizzazione, focalizzazione e interrogazione in sardo”. Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes VII ed. by M. Iliescu, H. Siller-Runggaldier & P. Danler, 189–197. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2010b “Focus Fronting and the Left Periphery in Sardinian”. Syntactic Variation: The dialects of Italy ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Ian Roberts & Adam Ledgeway 261–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary
1974 Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT..
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2007 “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features”. Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinto, Manuela
1997 Licensing and Interpretation of Inverted Subjects in Italian. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Pittau, Massimo
1972 Grammatica del sardo-nuorese: il più conservativo dei parlari neolatini. Bologna: Patron.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Jean-Yves Pollock
2004 “On the Left Periphery of some Romance Wh-questions”. The Structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures II ed. by Luigi. Rizzi, 251–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
2006 “Subject Clitics and Complex Inversion”. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, Vol. 4, 601–659. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remberger, Eva-Maria
2010 “Left-peripheral Interactions in Sardinian”. Lingua 120.555–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. Elements of Grammar ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “On the Form of Chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects”. Wh-Movement: Moving on ed. by Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010 Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, incorporation and defective goals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Chung-Hye Han
2002 “Verum Focus in Negative Yes/No Questions and Ladd’s p /¬p Ambiguity”. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XII ed. by Brendan Jackson, 204–224. ITHACA, NY.: CLC Publications.
Schwarzschild, Roger
1999 “Givenness, AvoidF and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent”. Natural Language Semantics 7.141–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle
2007 The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University.
Soare, Gabriela
2009 The Syntax-Information Structure Interface: A comparative view from Romanian. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Genève..
Tortora, Christina M.
2001 “Evidence for a Null Locative in Italian”. Current Issues in Italian Syntax ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi, 313–326. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Rafaella
1997 Negation and Clausal Structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa
1998 Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cruschina, Silvio, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger
2019. The dialects of Italy at the interfaces. In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Giurgea, Ion
2021. Verum focus and Romanian polar questions. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Mensching, Guido
2016. Yes/no interrogatives and focus in Sardinian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.