Article published in:Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 213–232
‘Minimal link constraint’ violations
Move vs. Agree
This paper continues the long-standing discussion whether clitics in clitic doubling constructions should be regarded as being similar to affixes expressing subject–verb agreement or rather as reflexes of movement. A crosslinguistic comparison of clitics will show that although clitics come in different flavors either as phi-features or as determiners, they are all the result of an overt feature movement to repair violations of the Minimal Link Constraint (MLC) (Anagnostopoulou 2005). Raising constructions in Greek, Romanian and Spanish use clitic doubling as a strategy to avoid minimality effects. On the basis of a parallel between clitic doubling and Raising, I will conclude that they are the outcome of two different operations Move vs. (Long Distance) Agree but both are sensitive to MLC and are regulated by a phase-based locality condition (the Phase Impenetrability Condition).
Published online: 17 December 2014
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Gianina Iordachioaia & Mihaela Marchis
1994 Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek. Ph.D. dissertation, Salzburg University.
Barss, Andrew & Howard Lasnik
1999 Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.
Boeckx, Cedric & Ángel J. Gallego
2008 “Clitic Climbing by (Long Distance) Agree”. Paper presented at the workshop Meeting Clitics. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, August 18–29.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko
Diaconescu, Rodica & Maria-Luisa Rivero
2005 “An Applicative Analysis of Double Object Constructions in Romanian”. Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association . [http://westernlinguistics.ca/Publications/CLA-ACL/Diaconescu_Rivero.pdf]
Grosu, Alexander & Julia Horvath
Holmberg, Anders & Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir
Hornstein, Norbert, Sara Rosen & Juan Uriagereka
1996 “A Brief Grammar of Euskara, the Basque Language”. Ms.,Vitoria-Gasteiz: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (University of the Basque Country).
2012 “A Movement Approach of Control and the Inflected Infinitive”. Paper presented at the 42nd annual Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Southern Utah University, April 20–22.
Martins, Ana-Maria & Jairo Nunes
1998 Locality in A-Movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene & Ioannis Veloudis
Polinksy, Maria & Eric Potsdam
2008 “Real and Apparent Long-Distance Agreement in Subject-to Subject Raising Constructions”. Paper presented at the workshop on Local-modelling of non-local dependencies , DGfS XXX, Bamberg.
2008 “Breaking Agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic-doubling by their failures”. Ms.,MIT.
1977 A Theory of Clitics. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
1997 INFL in Child and Adult Language: Agreement, case, and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
1992 “Clitic Constructions”. Ms., UCLA.
1992 PRO in Finite Clauses: A study of the inflectional heads of the Balkan languages. Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.
1988 “A DP Analysis of Spanish Nominals”. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Boston.
1982 Government and Proper Government of Verbal projections. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
Cited by other publications
Marchis Moreno, Mihaela & Carolina Petersen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.