Article published in:
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 331–348

On the relation between functional architecture and patterns of change in Romance object clitic syntax

| CUNY (College of Staten Island and The Graduate Center)
Complement clitic pronouns (OCLs) in Romance are not all created equal: diachronic change in OCL syntax can at first affect some clitic forms, but not others. This paper examines two cases of variation and change in OCL syntax from two different Romance varieties. Specifically, I examine the change in progress in OCL-infinitive order in Fassano (Ladin) varieties, and the variation in the OCL-types which participate in a non-standard imperative construction in Spanish. I explore the idea that variation and change in these apparently unrelated cases is the result of the same underlying fact, namely, that the different OCL forms occupy distinct functional heads within the functional hierarchy of the clause, within the stretch of functional architecture I call the ‘clitic placement domain’. The Functional Hierarchy Hypothesis for clitic placement provides a framework in which to understand how syntactic variation and change affects the different OCLs in a predictable way.
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.22tor
References

References

Albin, Thomas
1984 Syntactic Peculiarities of Piedmontese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Benincà, Paola & Christina Tortora
2009 “Towards a Finer-grained Theory of Italian Participial Clausal Architecture”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15.17–26.Google Scholar
2010 “On Clausal Architecture: Evidence from complement clitic placement in Romance”. Movement and Clitics: Adult and child grammar ed. by Vincenç Torrens, Linda Escobar, Anna Gavarró & Juncal Gutiérrez, 219–237. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Benucci, Franco
1993 “Temporal Periphrasis and Clitics in Central Romance”. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 3.51–83.Google Scholar
Brero, Camillo & Renzo Gandolfo
1967 La letteratura in piemontese dalle origini al Risorgimento. Torino: Casanova.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2008 “On Different Types of Clitic Clusters”. The Bantu-Romance Connection: A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs and information structure ed. by Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth, 41–82. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2004 “ ‘Restructuring’ and Functional Structure”. Structures and Beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures 3 ed. by Adriana Belletti, 132–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James & Morris Halle
2005 “Unexpected Plural Inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis”. Linguistic Inquiry 36.195–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010 “Toward a Syntactic Reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005)”. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008: Selected papers from Going Romance, Groningen 2008 ed. by Reinneke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse, 145–170. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita and Leonardo Savoia
2004 “Clitics: Cooccurrence and mutual exclusion patterns”. The structure of CP and IP ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 211–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana-Maria
1994 “Enclisis, VP deletion, and the Nature of Sigma”. Probus 6.173–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhem
1900 Grammaire des langues romanes. Paris: H. Welter.Google Scholar
Parry, Mair
1991 “Posizione dei clitici complemento nelle costruzioni verbali perifrastiche del piemontese”. RASLLP VIII.247–259.Google Scholar
1995 “Some observations on the syntax of clitic pronouns in Piedmontese”. Linguistic theory and the Romance languages ed. by John C. Smith & Martin Maiden, 133–160. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Parluma ’D Còiri. Sociolinguistica e grammatica del dialetto di Cairo Montenotte. Savona: Editrice Liguria.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1971 Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Rasom, Sabrina
2006 “La posizione del pronome clitico oggetto con le forme verbali ‘non-f­inite’. Differenze areali e generazionali nel fassano”. Giovani, lingue e dialetti ed. by Gianna Marcato, 109–114. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1968 Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
1969 Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Tana, Carlo
1784 Il Conte Pioletto. Commedia piemontese. Torino: Briolo.Google Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto
1999 “Clitic Combinations, Their Hosts and Ordering”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17.85–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tortora, Christina
2010 “Domains of clitic placement in finite and non-finite clauses: Evidence from a Piedmontese dialect”. Syntactic Variation: The dialects of Italy ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts, 135–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2014a A Comparative Grammar of Borgomanerese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014b “Patterns of Variation and Diachronic Change in Piedmontese Object Clitic Syntax”. Diachrony and Dialects ed. by Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent, 218–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, Edward
1992 “Del pronome d’oggetto suffisso al sintagma verbale. In calce ad una nota salvioniana del 1903”. L ’ Italia Dialettale 55.13–63.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997 Negation and Clausal Structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pescarini, Diego
2015.  In Romance Linguistics 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 7], ► pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.