Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 281–302

The syntax of mood constructions in Old Japanese

A corpus-based study

| University of Oxford
| University of York

This paper investigates several mood constructions in Old Japanese, the language of eight-century Japan. We focus on imperative, prohibitive, and optative constructions, expressing the desire of the speaker for either the speaker or another entity to perform (or not) in an event or situation (cf. Bybee et al. 1994, Aikhenvald 2010). These forms have been discussed only briefly in previous literature (e.g., Vovin 2009, Frellesvig 2010), and their grammatical properties have not been investigated up to now. The present study uses the Oxford Corpus of Old Japanese, a syntactically annotated corpus, to investigate the expression of the logical subject of mood constructions, i.e., the entity which the speaker desires to perform (or not) the event of the verb. This logical subject is never marked for case in any of the mood constructions, even though case-marking is found on subjects in all other Old Japanese clause-types.

Keywords: case marking, corpus linguistics, imperative, mood, Old Japanese, optative, prohibitive, subject(s)
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.15rus
References (18)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2010 Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010 A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke, Stephen Wright Horn, Kerri L. Russell & Peter Sells
n.d. The Oxford Corpus of Old Japanese. [URL]
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan Sag
2000 Interrogative Investigations. Stanford, Cal.: CSLI.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2011 On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Koyonagi, Tomokazu
1996 “On the Expressions of Prohibition and Restraint in Ancient Japanese”. Kokugogaku, 184.1–13.Google Scholar
Omodaka Hisataka
ed. 1967 Jidai Betsu Kokugo Daijiten: Jōdai Hen [A dictionary of the Japanese language by periods: Old Japanese Volume]. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
1984 [1957–1977] Man’yōshū Chūshaku [Commentary on the Man’yōshū]. Volumes 1–22. Revised edition. Tokyo: Chuō Kōronsha.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
Forthcoming. “Imperatives”. To appear in The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics ed. Maria Aloni & Paul Dekker Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Russell, Kerri L. & Stephen Wright Horn
2012 “Verb Semantics and Argument Realization in Pre-modern Japanese: A Corpus Based Study”. Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 25.129–148.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky
1985 “Speech Acts Distinctions in Syntax”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description ed. by Timothy Shopen, 155–196. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1975 “Indirect Speech Acts”. Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts ed. by Peter Cole & J.L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Takagi, Ichinosuke, Gomi Tomohide & Ōno Susumu
eds. 1958–1962 Man’yōshū. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei [A survey of Japanese classical literature] Vols. 4–7. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Tsuchihashi Yutaka & Konishi Jin’ichi
1957 Kodai Kayōshū [A Collection of Songs of the Ancient Period]. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei [A Survey of Japanese Classical Literature]. Vol. 3. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander
2009 A Descriptive and Comparative Grammar of Western Old Japanese, Volume 2: Adjectives and Verbs. Folkestone, Kent: Global Oriental Press.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
2008 “Encoding the Addressee in the Syntax: Evidence from English Imperative Subjects”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26.185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Miok Pak & Paul Portner
2012 “A Syntactic Analysis of Interpretive Restrictions on Imperative, Promissive, and Exhortative Subjects”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30.1231–1274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by 4 other publications

[no author supplied]
2016. Copyright Page. In Archi, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. General Preface. In Archi, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. List of Abbreviations. In Archi, ► pp. xv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. Preface. In Archi, ► pp. xiii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.