Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 303–324

Medieval Sardinian

New evidence for syntactic change from Latin to Romance

ORCID logo
We present evidence that Old Sardinian, in contrast to other old Romance systems commonly reported to be verb-second, had a form of verb-initial syntax with optional pragmatically-driven focalisation and topicalisation into the left periphery. We argue that this verb-initial order is derived through verb movement to C. Whilst V-to-C movement is a characteristic shared by Old Sardinian and other old Romance languages, the makeup of the left periphery is partially distinct. In Old Sardinian merger of a left peripheral topic/focus is optional, whilst in other old Romance verb-second systems it is a systematic requirement due to an {+epp} feature on C. We argue that V-to-C movement is a feature inherited by all the old Romance languages from late Latin, but suggest that only Old Sardinian retains the late Latin characteristic that left peripheral topicalisation or focalisation is optional and pragmatically-driven. The {+epp} feature on C is an innovation occurring in the other old Romance verb-second systems and not present in late Latin.
Keywords: clausal structure, Latin, left periphery, Old Romance, Sardinian, verb movement
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.16wol
References (96)
References
Adams, James N. 1977. The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (P. Mich. VIII, 467–72). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994a. Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of Copula esse in Classical Latin. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
. 1994b. “Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Pronouns in Classical Latin”. Transactions of the Philological Society 92:2. 103–178.Google Scholar
Adams, Marianne. 1987a. “Embedded Pro”. Proceedings of NELS 16 , ed. by James Blevins & Juli Carter, 1:1–22.
. 1987b. “From Old French to the Theory of Pro-Drop”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5 (1).1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987c. Old French, Null Subjects, and Verb Second Phenomena. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Les effets V2 en ancien et en moyen français”. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliqué 7.13–39.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2008. “The Macroparameter in a Microparametric World”. The Limits of Syntactic Variation, ed. by Theresa Biberuaer, 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte. 2009. “Word Order”. New Perspectives on Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, ed. by Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 1:241–316. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 1995. The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. “Aspects of the Low IP Area”. The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky. 1995. “The Order of Verbal Complements: A Comparative Study”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13.489–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1983. “Osservazioni sulla sintassi dei testi di Lio Mazor”. Langue, Dialecte, Litterature. Etudes Romanes à La Mémoire de Hugo Plomteux, ed. by Christian Angelet, Ludo Melis, Frans Jozef Mertens & Franco Mussara, 187–197. Louvain: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
. 1983–4. “Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali”. Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica 4.3–19.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia Law”. Clause Structure and Language Change., ed. by Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye, 325–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “The Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online 2:2.243–297.Google Scholar
. 2006. “A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture ed. by Rafaella Zanuttini, 53–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Topic, Focus, and V2”. The Structure of CP and IP ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 2001. “On the Position of Topic and Focus in the Left Periphery”. Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi, 39–64. North-Holland Linguistic Series. London & New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia. 1999. “On the Origin of Sardinian Àere a Plus Infinitive”. Medioevo Romanzo XXIII:III.321–358.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. “Is Topic a Root Phenomenon?” Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2.43–88.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa. 2002. “Verb Second in Afrikaans: Is This a Unitary Phenomenon?” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34.19–68.Google Scholar
Blasco-Ferrer, Eduardo. 2002. Linguistica sarda : storia, metodi, problemi. Cagliari: Condaghes.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. ­Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D., Maggie Tallerman & David W.E. Willis. 2007. The Syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 2006. “La sintaxis de las Glosas Emilianeses en una perspectiva tipológica”. Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua española ed. by Girón Alonchel, José Luis, de Bustos Tovar & José Jesús, 529–544. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Butler, Jonny. 2003. “A Minimalist Treatment of Modality”. Lingua 113. 967–996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Ian Roberts. 2002. “Clause Structure and X-Second”. Functional Structure in DP and IP ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 1.123–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew, Heidi Harley & Elizabeth Pyatt. 2000. “VSO Order as Raising to Out of IP”. The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages ed. by Andrew Carnie & Eithne Guilfoyle, 39–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kentstowicz, 1–54. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clackson, James & Geoffrey C. Horrocks. 2007. The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Besten, Hans. 1983. “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules”. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania ed. by Werner Abraham, 47–61. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devine, Andrew M., & Laurence D. Stephens. 2006. Latin Word Order: Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Ordóñez, Inés. 2009. “Orden de palabras, tópicos y focos en la prosa alfonsí”. Alcanate 6.139–172.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep. 1993. Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Paola Benincà. 1992. The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. Romance Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova. 2010. “From V1 to V2 in West Germanic”. Lingua 120:2.315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2012. “Verb Second.” Syntax– an International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research ed. by Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra Thompson. 1973. “On the Applicability of Root Transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 4.465–497.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2011. “Latin Syntax”. A companion to the Latin language ed. by James ­Clackson, 118–143. Chichester, West Sussex & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & Ans van Kemenade. 1995. “Verb-Second, Pro-drop, Functional Projections and Language Change”. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye, 227–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil. 2001. “IP-internal Topic and Focus Phrases”. Studia Linguistica 55:1.39–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1994. Syntaxe de l’ancien Occitan. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2010. “A Typology of V2 with Regard to V1 and Second Position Phenomena: An Introduction to the V1/V2 Volume”. Lingua 120:2.197–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1975. “Dutch as an SOV Language”. Linguistic Analysis 1.111–136.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 2012. “Topic and Focus in Old French V1 and V2 Structures”. Ms., University of Quebec.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. Forthcoming. “The Verb Phrase”. The Syntax of Italian, ed. by Giuseppe ­Longobardi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2007. “Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations”. Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy ed. by Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi, 121–49. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs. Move”. Journal of Linguistics 44.437–470.Google Scholar
. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. From Latin to Romance : Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde, Paul. 1923. “Die Stellung des Verbs in der lateinischen Prosa”. Glotta 12.153–78.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Alessandra. 2007. “Posizione dei clitici e ordine dei costituenti della lingua sarda medievale”. Sui dialetti italoromanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent ed. by Adam Ledgeway & Delia Bentley, 133–148. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 1995. “Verb-initial Sentences in Some Ancient Indo-European Languages”. Word Order in Discourse ed. by Pamela Downing and Michael Noonan, 355–386. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules. 1938. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. Vol. 2. 3 vols. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Möbitz, Otto. 1924. “Die Stellung des Verbums in den Schriften des Apuleius”. Glotta 13.116–26.Google Scholar
Mussafia, Alfredo. 1888. “Enclisi o proclisi del pronome personale atono quale oggeto”. Romania 27.145–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oniga, Renato. 1988. I composti nominali latini. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Ostafin, David M. 1986. Studies in Latin Word Order: A Transformational Approach. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Pinkster, Harm. 1991. “Evidence for SVO in Latin?” Latin and the Early Romance Languages in the Middle Ages ed. by Roger Wright, 69–82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1986. “comp, infl and Germanic Word Order”. Topics in Scandinavian Syntax ed. by Lars Hellan & Kirsti Koch Christensen, 185–234. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “The Loss of Verb Second in English and French”. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye, 200–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. Forthcoming. Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
. 2002. “The Left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance Dialects: A New View on V2 and V3”. Syntactic Microvariation ed. by Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij, 214–242. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Polo, Chiara. 2005. “Latin Word Order in Generative Perspective: An Explanatory Proposal within the Sentence Domain”. Universal Grammar in the Reconstruction of Ancient Languages ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 373–428. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remberger, Eva Maria. 2012. “Sardinian Syntax in Diachrony”. Paper presented at Cambridge Italian Dialect Syntax-Morphology Meeting, Leiden, May 2012.
Ribeiro, Ilza. 1995. “Evidence for a Verb-second Phase in Old Portuguese”. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts, 110–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Grammar ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: a Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Phases, Head Movement and Second-position Effects”. Phases Developing the Framework ed. by Angel J. Gallego, 385–440. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 2005. Principles and Parameters in a VSO Language: A Case Study in Welsh. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1973. “The Penthouse Principle and the Order of Constituents”. You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node ed. by Claudia Corum, Cedrik Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2004. La formazione della struttura di frase romanza : ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Some Firm Points on Latin Word Order: The Left Periphery”. Universal Grammar in the Reconstruction of Ancient Languages ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 429–457. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Morphosyntactic Persistence”. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages ed. by Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, & Adam Ledgeway, 155–215. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “On the Nature of the V2 System of Medieval Romance”. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 7: Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto, 103–111. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobler, Adolf. 1883. “Die altvenzianische Übersetzung der Sprüche des Dionysius Cato”. 
AbhBerlin: 1.1–87.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara. 1987. “The Evolution of Prodrop in Medieval French”. Ms., University of Cornell.
. 1988. “L’évolution de pro-drop en français médiéval”. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 7.85–109.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Verb-first Declaratives Introduced by et and the Position of Pro in Old and Middle French”. Lingua 89:2–3.281–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French : Verb-second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1988. “Latin”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 26–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Virdis, Maurizio. 1996. “Note di sintassi sarda medievale.” Studia et Hilaritate: Melanges de Linguistique Am et D’onomastique Sardes et Romanes Offerts a Monsieur Heinz Jurgen Wolf ed. by Dieter Kremer & Alf Monjour, 507–527. Strasburg/Nancy: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892. “Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung”. Indo­germanische Forschungen 1:333–436.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold. 1951. La lingua sarda: Storia, spirito e forma. Berna: A. FranckeGoogle Scholar
Wanner, Dieter. 1987. The Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns: from Latin to Old Romance. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. Forthcoming. “The Old Sardinian Condaghes: A Syntactic Study”. Transactions of the Philological Society.
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo
Martins, Ana Maria
2019. Chapter 1. Against V2 as a general property of Old Romance languages. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15], ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Meklenborg Salvesen, Christine
2019. A micro-perspective on Verb-second in Romance and Germanic. Linguistic Variation 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2018. Probing the Syntax of a Problematic Particle: Old French ‘si’ Revisited. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:3 ► pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2020. Old French si, grammaticalisation, and the interconnectedness of change. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.