Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 303–324

Medieval Sardinian

New evidence for syntactic change from Latin to Romance

ORCID logo

We present evidence that Old Sardinian, in contrast to other old Romance systems commonly reported to be verb-second, had a form of verb-initial syntax with optional pragmatically-driven focalisation and topicalisation into the left periphery. We argue that this verb-initial order is derived through verb movement to C. Whilst V-to-C movement is a characteristic shared by Old Sardinian and other old Romance languages, the makeup of the left periphery is partially distinct. In Old Sardinian merger of a left peripheral topic/focus is optional, whilst in other old Romance verb-second systems it is a systematic requirement due to an {+epp} feature on C. We argue that V-to-C movement is a feature inherited by all the old Romance languages from late Latin, but suggest that only Old Sardinian retains the late Latin characteristic that left peripheral topicalisation or focalisation is optional and pragmatically-driven. The {+epp} feature on C is an innovation occurring in the other old Romance verb-second systems and not present in late Latin.

Keywords: clausal structure, Latin, left periphery, Old Romance, Sardinian, verb movement
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.16wol
References
Adams, James N
1977 The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (P. Mich. VIII, 467–72). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
1994a Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of Copula esse in Classical Latin. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
1994b “Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Pronouns in Classical Latin”. Transactions of the Philological Society 92:2. 103–178.Google Scholar
Adams, Marianne
1987a “Embedded Pro”. Proceedings of NELS 16 , ed. by James Blevins & Juli Carter, 1:1–22.
1987b “From Old French to the Theory of Pro-Drop”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5 (1).1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987c Old French, Null Subjects, and Verb Second Phenomena. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
1988 “Les effets V2 en ancien et en moyen français”. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliqué 7.13–39.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
2008 “The Macroparameter in a Microparametric World”. The Limits of Syntactic Variation, ed. by Theresa Biberuaer, 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte
2009 “Word Order”. New Perspectives on Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, ed. by Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 1:241–316. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L.M.
1995 The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 “Aspects of the Low IP Area”. The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky
1995 “The Order of Verbal Complements: A Comparative Study”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13.489–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1983 “Osservazioni sulla sintassi dei testi di Lio Mazor”. Langue, Dialecte, Litterature. Etudes Romanes à La Mémoire de Hugo Plomteux, ed. by Christian Angelet, Ludo Melis, Frans Jozef Mertens & Franco Mussara, 187–197. Louvain: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
1983–4 “Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali”. Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica 4.3–19.Google Scholar
1995 “Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia Law”. Clause Structure and Language Change., ed. by Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye, 325–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004 “The Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online 2:2.243–297.Google Scholar
2006 “A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture ed. by Rafaella Zanuttini, 53–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
2004 “Topic, Focus, and V2”. The Structure of CP and IP ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2001 “On the Position of Topic and Focus in the Left Periphery”. Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi, 39–64. North-Holland Linguistic Series. London & New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia
1999 “On the Origin of Sardinian Àere a Plus Infinitive”. Medioevo Romanzo XXIII:III.321–358.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli
2010 “Is Topic a Root Phenomenon?” Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2.43–88.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2002 “Verb Second in Afrikaans: Is This a Unitary Phenomenon?” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34.19–68.Google Scholar
Blasco-Ferrer, Eduardo
2002 Linguistica sarda : storia, metodi, problemi. Cagliari: Condaghes.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. ­Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D., Maggie Tallerman & David W.E. Willis
2007 The Syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg
2006 “La sintaxis de las Glosas Emilianeses en una perspectiva tipológica”. Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua española ed. by Girón Alonchel, José Luis, de Bustos Tovar & José Jesús, 529–544. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Butler, Jonny
2003 “A Minimalist Treatment of Modality”. Lingua 113. 967–996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Ian Roberts
2002 “Clause Structure and X-Second”. Functional Structure in DP and IP ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 1.123–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew, Heidi Harley & Elizabeth Pyatt
2000 “VSO Order as Raising to Out of IP”. The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages ed. by Andrew Carnie & Eithne Guilfoyle, 39–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kentstowicz, 1–54. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clackson, James & Geoffrey C. Horrocks
2007 The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2012 Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Besten, Hans
1983 “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules”. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania ed. by Werner Abraham, 47–61. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devine, Andrew M., & Laurence D. Stephens
2006 Latin Word Order: Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
2009 “Orden de palabras, tópicos y focos en la prosa alfonsí”. Alcanate 6.139–172.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep
1993 Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2012 Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Paola Benincà
1992 The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. Romance Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova
2010 “From V1 to V2 in West Germanic”. Lingua 120:2.315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2012. “Verb Second.” Syntax– an International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research ed. by Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou Berlin Walter de Gruyter
Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack
1995 The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra Thompson
1973 “On the Applicability of Root Transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 4.465–497.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
2011 “Latin Syntax”. A companion to the Latin language ed. by James ­Clackson, 118–143. Chichester, West Sussex & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & Ans van Kemenade
1995 “Verb-Second, Pro-drop, Functional Projections and Language Change”. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye, 227–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil
2001 “IP-internal Topic and Focus Phrases”. Studia Linguistica 55:1.39–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1994 Syntaxe de l’ancien Occitan. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jouitteau, Mélanie
2010 “A Typology of V2 with Regard to V1 and Second Position Phenomena: An Introduction to the V1/V2 Volume”. Lingua 120:2.197–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1975 “Dutch as an SOV Language”. Linguistic Analysis 1.111–136.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie
2012 “Topic and Focus in Old French V1 and V2 Structures”. Ms., University of Quebec.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
Forthcoming. “The Verb Phrase”. The Syntax of Italian ed. by Giuseppe ­Longobardi Cambridge Cambridge University Press
2007 “Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations”. Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy ed. by Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi, 121–49. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
2008 “Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs. Move”. Journal of Linguistics 44.437–470.Google Scholar
2009 Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 From Latin to Romance : Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde, Paul
1923 “Die Stellung des Verbs in der lateinischen Prosa”. Glotta 12.153–78.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Alessandra
2007 “Posizione dei clitici e ordine dei costituenti della lingua sarda medievale”. Sui dialetti italoromanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent ed. by Adam Ledgeway & Delia Bentley, 133–148. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1995 “Verb-initial Sentences in Some Ancient Indo-European Languages”. Word Order in Discourse ed. by Pamela Downing and Michael Noonan, 355–386. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules
1938 L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. Vol. 2. 3 vols. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Möbitz, Otto
1924 “Die Stellung des Verbums in den Schriften des Apuleius”. Glotta 13.116–26.Google Scholar
Mussafia, Alfredo
1888 “Enclisi o proclisi del pronome personale atono quale oggeto”. Romania 27.145–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oniga, Renato
1988 I composti nominali latini. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Ostafin, David M
1986 Studies in Latin Word Order: A Transformational Approach. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Pinkster, Harm
1991 “Evidence for SVO in Latin?” Latin and the Early Romance Languages in the Middle Ages ed. by Roger Wright, 69–82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1986 “comp, infl and Germanic Word Order”. Topics in Scandinavian Syntax ed. by Lars Hellan & Kirsti Koch Christensen, 185–234. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “The Loss of Verb Second in English and French”. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye, 200–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
Forthcoming. Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
2002 “The Left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance Dialects: A New View on V2 and V3”. Syntactic Microvariation ed. by Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij, 214–242. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Polo, Chiara
2005 “Latin Word Order in Generative Perspective: An Explanatory Proposal within the Sentence Domain”. Universal Grammar in the Reconstruction of Ancient Languages ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 373–428. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remberger, Eva Maria
2012 “Sardinian Syntax in Diachrony”. Paper presented at Cambridge Italian Dialect Syntax-Morphology Meeting, Leiden, May 2012.
Ribeiro, Ilza
1995 “Evidence for a Verb-second Phase in Old Portuguese”. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts, 110–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Grammar ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993 Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: a Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Phases, Head Movement and Second-position Effects”. Phases Developing the Framework ed. by Angel J. Gallego, 385–440. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian G
2005 Principles and Parameters in a VSO Language: A Case Study in Welsh. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R
1973 “The Penthouse Principle and the Order of Constituents”. You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node ed. by Claudia Corum, Cedrik Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2004 La formazione della struttura di frase romanza : ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Some Firm Points on Latin Word Order: The Left Periphery”. Universal Grammar in the Reconstruction of Ancient Languages ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 429–457. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Morphosyntactic Persistence”. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages ed. by Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, & Adam Ledgeway, 155–215. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “On the Nature of the V2 System of Medieval Romance”. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 7: Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto, 103–111. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobler, Adolf
1883 “Die altvenzianische Übersetzung der Sprüche des Dionysius Cato”. 
AbhBerlin: 1.1–87.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1987 “The Evolution of Prodrop in Medieval French”. Ms., University of Cornell.
1988 “L’évolution de pro-drop en français médiéval”. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 7.85–109.Google Scholar
1993 “Verb-first Declaratives Introduced by et and the Position of Pro in Old and Middle French”. Lingua 89:2–3.281–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Syntactic Change in Medieval French : Verb-second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1988 “Latin”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 26–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Virdis, Maurizio
1996 “Note di sintassi sarda medievale.” Studia et Hilaritate: Melanges de Linguistique Am et D’onomastique Sardes et Romanes Offerts a Monsieur Heinz Jurgen Wolf ed. by Dieter Kremer & Alf Monjour, 507–527. Strasburg/Nancy: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1892 “Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung”. Indo­germanische Forschungen 1:333–436.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold
1951 La lingua sarda: Storia, spirito e forma. Berna: A. FranckeGoogle Scholar
Wanner, Dieter
1987 The Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns: from Latin to Old Romance. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
Forthcoming. “The Old Sardinian Condaghes: A Syntactic Study”. Transactions of the Philological Society.
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo
Martins, Ana Maria
2019. Chapter 1. Against V2 as a general property of Old Romance languages. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15], ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Meklenborg Salvesen, Christine
2019. A micro-perspective on Verb-second in Romance and Germanic. Linguistic Variation 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2018. Probing the Syntax of a Problematic Particle: Old French ‘si’ Revisited. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:3 ► pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2020. Old French si, grammaticalisation, and the interconnectedness of change. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.