References (27)
References
André, Carine, Alain Ghio, Christian Cavé & Bernard Teston. 2003. “PERCEVAL: a Computer-Driven System for Experimentation on Auditory and Visual Perception”. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 15), Barcelona, 3-9 August 2003 ed. by Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquín Romero, 1421-1424. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Audacity Team. 2010. Audacity [computer program]. ([URL]).
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer: Version 5.2.09 ([URL]) (Retrieved on January 10, 2011).Google Scholar
Cangemi, Francesco. 2014. Prosodic Detail in Neapolitan Italian. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Cangemi, Francesco, Francesco Cutugno, Bogdan Ludusan, Dino Seppi & Dirk Van Compernolle. 2011. “Automatic Speech Segmentation for Italian (ASSI): Tools, models, evaluation and applications”. Contesto comunicativo e variabilità nella produzione e percezione della lingua. Proceedings of the 7th Associazione Italiana di Scienze della Voce Conference, Lecce, 26-28 January 2011 ed. by Barbara Gili Fivela, Antonio Stella, Luigia Garrapa & Mirko Grimaldi, 337-344. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Cangemi, Francesco & Mariapaola D’Imperio. 2011. “Local Speech Rate Differences between Questions and Statements in Italian”. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 17), Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 ed. by Wai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee, 392-395. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Tempo and the Perception of Sentence Modality”. Laboratory Phonology 4:1.191-219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D'Imperio, Mariapaola & Francesco Cangemi. 2009. “The Interplay between Tonal Alignment and Rise Shape in the Perception of Two Neapolitan Rising Accents”. Paper presented at the 4th Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia Conference (PaPI 2009), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, June 2009.
De Dominicis, Amedeo. 2010. “Interrogative e assertive in un corpus dialettale recuperato (Bomarzo)”. La dimensione temporale del parlato: Proceedings of the 5th Associazione Italiana di Scienze della Voce Conference, Zurich, 4-6 February 2009 ed. by Stephan Schmid, Michael Schwarzenbach & Dieter Studer, 335-350. Torriana: EDK.Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey. 1972. “Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23:2.283-292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eefting, Wieke. 1991. “The Effect of Information Value and Accentuation on the Duration of Dutch Words, Syllables and Segments”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89:1.412-424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gubian, Michele, Francesco Cangemi & Lou Boves. 2011. “Joint Analysis of F0 and Speech Rate with Functional Data Analysis”. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , Prague, 22-27 May 2011, 4972-4975.
Henriksen, Nicholas. 2015. “Secondary Correlates of Question Signaling in Manchego Spanish”. This volume.Google Scholar
Lyberg, Bertil & Robert Eklund. 1995. “The Possible Use of Prosody in Spoken Language Translation Systems”. Speakers’ Papers, 7th World Telecommunication Forum, Technology Summit: Convergence of technologies, services and applications , Geneva, 3-11 October 1995, Vol. 1, 9-13.
Maturi, Pietro. 1988. “L’intonazione delle frasi dichiarative ed interrogative nella varietà napoletana dell’Italiano”. Rivista Italiana di Acustica 12.13-30.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Oliver, Julia Bergherr, Susanne Huth, Cassandra Lill & Jessica Neuschulz. 2010. “Intonationsfragen hinterfragt — Die Vielschichtigkeit der prosodischen Unterschiede zwischen Aussage — und Fragesätzen mit deklarativer Syntax”. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 77.304-346.Google Scholar
Petrone, Caterina. 2008. Le rôle de la variabilité phonétique dans la représentation des contours intonatifs et de leur sens. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Aix-Marseille I.Google Scholar
Pfitzinger, Hartmut R. 2001. Phonetische Analyse der Sprechgeschwindigkeit, Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München 38.117-264.Google Scholar
Rialland, Annie. 2007. “Question Prosody: An African perspective”. Tones and Tunes: Typological Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody ed. by Tomas Riad & Carlos Gussenoven, 35-62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryalls, John, Guylaine Le Dorze, Nathalie Lever, Lisa Ouellet & Céline Larfeuil. 1994. “The Effects of Age and Sex on Speech Intonation and Duration for Matched Statements and Questions in French”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95:4.2274-2276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Caroline L. 2002. “Prosodic Finality and Sentence Type in French”. Language and Speech 45:2.141-178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice, Satsuki Nakai & Mariko Sugahara. 2006. “Acoustic Segment Durations in Prosodic Research: A practical guide”. Methods in Empirical Prosody Research ed. by Stefan Sudhoff, Denisa Lenertová, Roland Meyer, Sandra Pappert, Petra Augurzky, Ina Mleinek, Nicole Richter & Johannes Schließer, 1-28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Heerden, Charl J. & Etienne Barnard. 2007. “Speech Rate Normalization Used to Improve Speaker Verification”. SAIEE Africa Research Journal 98:4.129-135.Google Scholar
van Heuven, Vincent J. & Judith Haan. 2000. “Phonetic Correlates of Statement versus Question Intonation in Dutch”. Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology ed. by Antonis Botinis, 119-143. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Temporal Distribution of Interrogativity Markers in Dutch: A perceptual study”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7 ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner, 61-86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Heuven, Vincent J. & Ellen van Zanten. 2005. “Speech Rate as a Secondary Prosodic Characteristic of Polarity Questions in Three Languages”. Speech Communication 47:1-2.87-99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Carl E. & Kenneth N. Stevens. 1972. “Emotions and Speech. Some Acoustical Correlates”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 52:4B.1238-1250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar