Article published in:
Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 93120
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Narrog, Heiko
2020. Historical change in the Japanese tense-aspect system. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Van de Velde, Freek
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 519 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Andersen, Henning
2006 “Grammation, Regrammation, and Degrammation: Tense loss in Russian”. Diachronica 23:2.231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Hiroshi
1996 “Kanō dōshi no seiritsu ni tsuite [About the genesis of the potential verbs]”. Gobun Kenkyū 81.1–13.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2010 “Linguistic Minimalism”. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 485–505. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
García García, Luisa
2005Germanische Kausativbildung: Die deverbalen jan-Verben im Gotischen. Heidelberg: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna
1998 “Testing the Boundaries of Grammaticalization”. The Limits of Grammaticalization ( = Typological Studies in Language, 37) ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper, 107–127. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2009The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1991 “The Last Stages of Grammatical Elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1 (= Typological Studies in Language, 19) ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 301–314. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnisch, Rüdiger
2004 “Verstärkungsprozesse. Zu einer Theorie der ‘Sekretion’ und des ‘Re-konstruktionellen Ikonismus’”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 32.210–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Zu einer Typologie sprachlicher Verstärkungsprozesse”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 3–23. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?Linguistics 37, 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2004 “On Genetic Motivation in Grammar”. Studies in Linguistic Motivation (= Cognitive Linguistics Research, 28) ed. by Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther, 103–120. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh
1984Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Itoi, Michihiro
2001Keredo. Setsuzokushi [ Keredo. A conjunction]”. Nihongo Bunpō Daijiten ed. by Akiho Yamaguchi & Morihide Akimoto, 238. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie
1976 “Functional Ambiguity and Syntactic Change”. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax April 1976, 126–135. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
1983Function and Form in the -áya-Formations of the Rig Veda and Atharva Veda. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
1996Back from the Brink. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language: Its nature, origin and development. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
2001 “Is there such a Thing as ‘Grammaticalization?’Language Sciences 23.163–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Rescuing Traditional (Historical) Linguistics from Grammaticalization Theory”. Up and down the Cline – The nature of grammaticalization ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon, 45–71. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Greek Verb Endings: ‘Lateral shifts’ and grammaticalization”. Presentation at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, 17–20 July 2005, Santiago de Compostela.
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993Middle Voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen
1994 “The Grammar of Causatives and the Conceptual Structure of Events”. Cognitive Linguistics 5/2.115–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi
2003 “ Ra-nuki kotoba no rekishiteki kenkyū [Historical research on ra-nuki verbs]”. Gekkan gengo 32/4.56–62.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G.
2000Emerging English Modals. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990 “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1989 “Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42.11–19.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1976 “Lahu Causative Constructions: Case hierarchies and the morphology/syntax cycle in a Tibeto-Burman perspective”. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 6 ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 413–442. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2002 “An Invisible Hand at the Root of Causation: The role of lexicalization in the grammaticalization of causatives”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 237–258. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Grammaticalization and explanation”. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 177–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
1999Japanische Verbflexive und flektierbare Verbalsuffixe. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
2004 “From Transitive to Causative in Japanese: Morphologization through exaptation”. Diachronica 21:2.351–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005“Nihongo no bunpōka no keitaironteki sokumen [The morphological aspect of grammaticalization in Japanese]”. Nihongo no kenkyū 1/3.108–122.Google Scholar
2007a “Exaptation, Grammaticalization, and Reanalysis”. California Linguistic Notes 32 (1).Google Scholar
2007b“Nihongo no jita dōshi-tsui no rukeironteki ichi-duke [The typological position of Japanese transitivity pairs]”. Lexicon Forum 3.161–193.Google Scholar
2010 “Voice and Non-canonical Marking in the Expression of Event-oriented Modality: A cross-linguistic study”. Linguistic Typology 14:1.71–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. “Japanese Transitivity Pairs through Time: A historical and typological perspective”. Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Japanese and Beyond (= Topics in Linguistics – Studies and Monographs) ed. by Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen Berlin & New York Mouton de Gruyter Crossref
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
2004 “Transitivizing and Detransitivizing Languages”. Linguistic Typology 8.149–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
NKD = Nihon Kokugo Daijiten [Great Dictionary of the Japanese Language]
, vol. 6. Second edition 2006 Tokyo: Shogakukan.
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okada, Judy
2004 “Causative Sa-Insertion in Japanese: Verbal and sentential patterns”. Nihongo Bunpō 4:2.69–88.Google Scholar
2008 “Morpheme Insertions in Japanese Causative and Potential Expressions”. Japanese Korean Linguistics 13.347–358.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Eric
1991 “The Ecology of Semantic Space”. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . 457–468.
Robbeets, Martine
2007 “The Causative-Passive in the Trans-Eurasian Languages”. Turkic Languages 11:2.235–278.Google Scholar
Sakanashi, Ryūzō
1994“Kanō dōshi no hattatsu [The development of potential verbs]”. Gengo Jōhō Kagaku Senkō Kiyō 1:1.128–142.Google Scholar
1995“Edo kōki no kanō dōshi [Potential verbs in the late Edo period]”. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 1:1995 1–15.Google Scholar
Sakazume, Rikiji
2010“Chōgonkashō ni mieru maikeredomo o megutte. Setsuzoku joshi keredomo no seiritsu-setsu o kenshō suru [About maikeredomo in the Chōgonkashō. An investigation into hypotheses about the genesis of the conjunctive particle keredomo ]”. Kindaigo Kenkyū 15.53–64.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1997“Gengo no kinō to kōzō to ruikei [Functions of language, structure and typology]”. Gengo Kenkyu 112.1–32.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst
2010 “ ‘Exaptation’ in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung.” Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung (= Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen, 37) ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, J.C.
2006 “How to Do Things without Junk: The refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance”. New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics. Volume II: Phonetics, phonology and dialectology ed. by J.-P.Y. Montreuil, 183–205. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suga, Kazuyoshi & Emiko Hayatsu
1995“Dōshi no jita o minaosu tame ni [Taking a new look at transitive-intransitive alternations]”. Dōshi no Jita ed. by Kazuyoshi Suga & Emiko Hayatsu, 207–231. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobō.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hideo
1994Ra-nuke kotoba [ Ra-nuke words]”. Kokubungaku Kaishaku to Kanshō 1994:7.67–76.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2004 “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies based on Corpora ed. by M. Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
2013 “On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Studies in Language 37:3.473–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N.
1995 “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993 (= Current Issues In Linguistic Theory, 124) ed. by Henning Andersen, 433–445. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, David
2007 “Syntactic lexicalization as a new type of degrammaticalization”. Linguistics 45:2.271–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Degrammaticalization and Obsolescent Morphology. Evidence from Slavonic”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 119) ed. by Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 151–178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2010 “Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung (= Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen, 37) ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 29–40. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yuzawa, Kōkichirō
1957Zōtei Edo Kotoba no Kenkyū [Research on the Edo language] (expanded and revised version). Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar