This article considers the relationship between exaptation and degrammaticalization. Both may involve obsolescent material being re-used, to express an existing grammatical category or a category not previously encoded. The processes involved are familiar ones: reanalysis triggering category reassignment. In both cases, change is caused by failure to acquire a grammatical category. Faced with material that expresses that category, acquirers either interpret it as some existing category or else abduce the existence of some new category. Exaptation and degrammaticalization are thus understood as cases of reanalysis within an acquisition-based framework of change. The concept of exaptation is therefore useful but not foundational: useful in highlighting unexpected pathways of development during ongoing obsolescence or opacity, but explicable in terms of other processes. I demonstrate this approach using two case studies: degrammaticalization of indefinite pronouns as nouns in Slavic and Celtic; and exaptive reinterpretation of the was-were distinction as expressing polarity in English dialects.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Definitional issues
2.1Definitions of and motivations for degrammaticalization
2.2Definitions of exaptation
3.Degrammaticalization “something” > “thing”
4.Exaptation of the English was-were distinction
5.Is all degrammaticalization and exaptation due to obsolescence?
Betha Colaim Chille, Life of Colum Cille, Compiled by Manus O’Donnell in 1532 ed. by A. O’Kelleher and G. Schoepperle. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1918.
The Book of Leinster, Formerly Lebar na Núachongbála ed. by R.I. Best, Osborn Bergin, M. A. O’Brien and Anne O’Sullivan. 6 vols. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1954–83.
“Bulgarian National Corpus”. Sofia: Institute for Bulgarian Language, 2009–2014, [URL].
Suprasălski ili Retkov Sbornik ed. by Jordan Zaimov and Mario Kapaldo. Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata Akademija na Naukite, 1982. [
Codex Suprasliensis
]
“A dictionary of the Old-Irish glosses in the Milan Codex Ambrosianus C 301 inf.” ed. by Aaron Griffith and David Stifter. [URL]. [
Milan glosses
]
“The Evernew Tongue” ed. by Whitley Stokes. Ériu 2.96–162. [
Tenga Bithnúa
]
References
Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2005. “Variation and the Minimalist Program”. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the biological and the social ed. by Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 265), 149–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2010. “Variation in Agreement: A lexical feature-based approach”. Lingua 120.1109–1134.
Allen, Cynthia L.2003. “Deflexion and the Development of the Genitive in English”. English Language and Linguistics 7.1–28.
Allen, Cynthia L.2008. Genitives in Early English: Typology and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and Deductive Change”. Language 49.765–793.
Britain, David. 2002. “Diffusion, Levelling, Simplification and Reallocation in Past Tense BE in the English Fens”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6.16–43.
Chambers, J.K.2004. “Dynamic Typology and Vernacular Universals”. Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect grammar from a crosslinguistic perspective ed. by Bernd Kortmann, 127–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cheshire, Jenny & Sue Fox. 2009. “Was/were Variation: A perspective from London”. Language Variation and Change 21.1–38.
Culicover, Peter W.2009. Natural Language Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1999. “Review Essay, Muriel Norde: The history of the genitive in Swedish. A case study in degrammaticalization [doctoral dissertation], 1997”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.77–90.
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2001. “The Swedish Genitive: A reply to Norde”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24.119–120.
Doyle, Aidan. 2002. “Yesterday’s Affixes as Today’s Clitics”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 67–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eckhoff, Hanne & Dag Haug. 2009. “Aligning Syntax in Early New Testament Texts: The PROIEL Corpus”. Diachronic Slavonic Syntax: Gradual changes in focus ed. by Björn Hansen & Jasmina Grković-Major, 41–51. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Giegerich, Heinz J.1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greene, David. 1958. “The Analytic Form of the Verb in Irish”. Ériu 18.108–112.
Greene, David. 1973. “Synthetic and Analytic: A reconsideration”. Ériu 24.121–133.
Haas, Nynke de. 2008. “The Origins of the Northern Subject Rule”. English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006 ed. by Marina Dossena, Richard Dury & Maurizio Gotti, 111–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .
Haas, Nynke de. 2011. Morphosyntactic Variation in Northern English: The Northern Subject Rule, its origins and early history. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, Jennifer. 2002. “From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix order revisited”. Language 78.527–555.
Hay, Jennifer & Ingo Plag. 2004. “What Constrains Possible Suffix Combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.565–596.
Heine, Bernd. 2003. “On Degrammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge, 163–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2007. “Diachronic Tendencies in Historical Phonology: The case of ‘secondary contractions’ in northern English”. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Isaac, Graham. 2003. “Diagnosing the Symptoms of Contact: Some Celtic-English case histories”. The Celtic Englishes III ed. by Hildegard L.C. Tristram, 46–64. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2012. “Grammaticalization as Optimization”. Grammatical Change: Origins, nature, outcomes ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 15–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. “The Origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact?” The Celtic Englishes II ed. by Hildegard L.C. Tristram, 329–346. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
Kuzmack, Stefanie. 2007. “Ish: A new case of antigrammaticalization”. Ms., University of Chicago.
Langacker, Ronald W.1977. “Syntactic Reanalysis”. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102.
Lass, Roger. 1992. “Phonology and Morphology”. The Cambridge History of the English Language: Volume II, 1066–1476 ed. by Norman Blake, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahon, William. 1993. “First plural mar in Connacht Irish”. Éigse 27.81–88.
McCafferty, Kevin. 2003. “The Northern Subject Rule in Ulster: How Scots, how English?” Language Variation and Change 15.105–139.
Matsumoto, Yo. 1988. “From Bound Grammatical Markers to Free Discourse Markers: History of some Japanese connectives”.
Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
, 340–351.
Matushansky, Ora. 2002. “More of a Good Thing: Russian synthetic and analytic comparatives”. Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The second Ann Arbor meeting, 2001 ed. by Jindřich Toman, 143–162. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Meisel, Jürgen M.2011. “Bilingual Language Acquisition and Theories of Diachronic Change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change”. Bilingualism 14.121–145.
Norde, Muriel. 2006. “Demarcating Degrammaticalization: The Swedish s-genitive revisited”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29.201–238.
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norde, Muriel. 2010. “Grammaticalization: Three common controversies”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 123–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ó Buachalla, Breandán. 1970. “Muinn ‘we’ in Southeast Ulster”. Éigse 13.31–49.
Petyt, K.M.1978. “Secondary Contraction in West Yorkshire Negatives”. Sociolinguistic Patterns ed. by Peter Trudgill, 91–100. London: Edward Arnold.
Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. “‘Some Do and Some Doesn’t’: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles”. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses ed. by Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Hermann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanne Wagner, 125–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Plank, Franz. 1995. “Entgrammatisierung: Spiegelbild der Grammatisierung?” Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel ed. by Norbert Boretzky & Andreas Bittner, 199–219. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Roberts, Ian G.1993. “A Formal Account of Grammaticalisation in the History of Romance Futures”. Folia Linguistica Historica 13.219–258.
Roberts, Ian G. & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic Change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roma, Elisa. 2000. “How Subject Pronouns Spread in Irish: A diachronic study and synchronic account of the third person + pronoun pattern”. Ériu 51.107–157.
Schilling-Estes, Natalie & Walt Wolfram. 1994. “Convergent Explanation and Alternative Regularization Patterns: Were/weren’t levelling in a vernacular English variety”. Language Variation and Change 6.273–302.
Simon, Horst J.2010. “‘Exaptation’ in der Sprachwandeltheorie: Eine Begriffspräzisierung”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Sussex, Roland & Paul Cubberley. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.1998. “Was/were Variation across the Generations: View from the city of York”. Language Variation and Change 10.153–191.
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A Grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
Toner, Gregory, Grigory Bondarenko & Sharon Arbuthnot. 2013. “Electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language”, [URL].
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2004. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies based on Corpora ed. by Minoji Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Traugott, Elizabeth & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde. 2013. “Degrammaticalization and Constructionalization: Two case studies”. Language Sciences 36.32–46.
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen, 433–445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Williams, N.J.A.1968. “Muinn ‘we’ in Southeast Ulster”. Éigse 12.297–300.
Willis, David. 2007. “Syntactic Lexicalization as a New Type of Degrammaticalization”. Linguistics 45.271–310.
Willis, David. 2009. “Old and Middle Welsh”. The Celtic Languages ed. by Martin Ball & Nicole Müller, 117–160. London: Routledge.
Willis, David. 2013a. “The History of Negation in the Brythonic Celtic Languages”. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Volume 1: Case studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 239–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, David. 2013b. “The History of Negation in the Slavonic languages”. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Volume 1: Case studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 341–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. “Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 29–40. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. “Cliticization vs. Inflection: English -n’t”. Language 59.502–513.
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
D’Antuono, Nicola
2024. From Latin QUO(D) VELLES to Romagnol Cvël: A Case of Degrammaticalisation from a Free‐choice Indefinite to the Noun ‘Thing’1. Transactions of the Philological Society 122:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
2019. Introduction. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 1 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Verbal –s. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 25 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Past BE. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 165 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 519 ff.
Willis, David
2017. Degrammaticalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 28 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Abbreviations, symbols, journal acronyms, and other conventions. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. xv ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Preface. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Textual sources. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 479 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.