Cover not available
Part of
Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 287–316

The history of nominative -er in Danish and Swedish

A case of exaptation?

A much cited example of exaptation is the development whereby the old case marker of the nominative in the masculine singular -er evolves into a derivative suffix changing adjectives into nouns in Swedish (Norde 2001, 2002, 2009; Heine 2003: 168; Narrog 2007). Recent studies based on Old and Middle Danish sources uncover how the developments of the old nominative took place (Jensen 2011); this paper presents an outline of these developments. The outline serves as the foundation for a discussion of whether the development of -er in Swedish and Danish should be taken as an example of exaptation, and if we really need the concept in historical linguistics at all, given that the developments depicted in this paper are easily and adequately covered by other well established concept of change, especially the notion of reanalysis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Danish and Swedish
    • 1.2Periodization
    • 1.3The data
  • 2.The textually motivated development of the case form -er
  • 3.The textual function in the dialect of Old Scanian
    • 3.1.1Information associated with focus
    • 3.1.2First mention of new discourse referents
    • 3.1.3Newly-returned topics
    • 3.2Scribal errors or symptoms of a functionally motivated system?
  • 4.Additional evidence for a textually motivated function of nominative
  • 5.The expansion of the adjectival -er suffix
  • 6.Same but different
  • 7.Exaptation?
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources and references
Published online: 24 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.10jen
References (74)
Sources and references
Sources
B 69 = Skånske Lov i Stockholm B 69 [Codex Holmiensis B 69 containing the Scanian Law], ca. 1350. Danmarks gamle Landskabslove [Medieval Danish Lawtexts], Vol. 1,1, Text II. 1933–1941, ed. by Johs. Brøndum-Nielsen, et al. København.Google Scholar
Bellman, Carl Michael, as quoted in Norde (2001, 2002, 2009).Google Scholar
ChrP = Christiern Pedersen “En nøttelig Legebog” [A useful book of medicine], 1533, [URL]
DSjT = “Sjælens Trøst”, [Comfort of the Soul], Danish version, ca. 1425, in Uppsala C 529 & Codex Holmiensis A 109, publ. by Niels Nielsen for Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund. København: J. H. Schultz Forlag 1937–1952.Google Scholar
Folk ballad, att. 19th cent., as quoted in Brøndum-Nielsen (1962).
Holberg = Ludvig Holberg, “Peder Paars”, 1720, as quoted in Ordbog over det Danske Sprog (ODS), [URL].
Mand = “Mandevilles rejse” [The Travel of Mandeville], ca. 1450–1500, as published in Gammeldansk Læsebog [Old Danish Reader], ed. by Nelly Uldaler & Gerd Wellejus. København: Gyldendal 1968.Google Scholar
Ny Test. = “Det ny Testamente” [New Testament], 1524, as quoted in Ejder (1945).Google Scholar
Oehlenschläger = Adam Oehlenschläger, ca. 1840, as quoted in Ordbog over det Danske Sprog (ODS), [URL], lemma selv .
Palladius = Peder Palladius “Sct. Peders skib” [The ship of St. Peters], 1554, as quoted in Ejder (1945).Google Scholar
PostU = “Uppsala-postillen” [The Postil from Uppsala], ca. 1450–1500, in Uppsala C 56,4º, publ. by G. E. Klemming, Svenska medeltids-postillor efter gamla handskrifter III. Stockholm: P. A. Norstedt & söner 1893.Google Scholar
RB = “En Ræffue Bog” [Book of the Fox], 1555, publ. by N. Møller for Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. København: Gyldendalske Boghandel & Nordisk Forlag1914–1915.Google Scholar
SSjT = “Själens tröst”, [Comfort of the Soul], Swedish version, 1430 or 1438–1442, in Codex Holmiensis A 108, publ. by Sam. Henning. Samlingar utgivna av svenska fornskrift-sällskapet 209. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri 1954.Google Scholar
Sthen = Hans Christensen Sthen ”En Liden Vandrebog” [A small book of wandering], 1589, [URL]
References
Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and Deductive Change”. Language 49.765–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandle, Oskar. 2011. Die Gliederung des Nordgermanischen. Reprint der Erstauflage mit einer Einführung von Kurt Braunmüller. Tübingen / Basel: A. Franckey.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla & Johanna Miecznikowski. 2009. “Central/peripheral Functions of allora and ‘Overall Pragmatic Configuration’: A diachronic perspective”. Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (= Studies in Pragmatics, 7), 107–121. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. “Accent is Predictable (if you’re a Mind Reader)”. Language 48.633–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Dieter Stein. 1995. “Functional Renewal”. Historical Linguistics 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 124), 33–47. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brøndum-Nielsen, Johs. 1918. “Danske Lovhåndskrifter og Dansk Lovsprog i den Ældre Middelalder”. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 34.105–137.Google Scholar
. 1928. Gammeldansk Grammatik I. Indledning. Tekstkildernes Lydbetegnelse. Vokalisme. 2nd ed. København: J. H. Schultz 1950.Google Scholar
. 1943–45. “Nogle Problemer indenfor Dansk Adjektivbøjning”. Acta Philologica Scandinavica 17.145–152.Google Scholar
. 1962. Gammeldansk Grammatik IV. Adjektiver. Adverbier. Numeralier. København: J. H. Schultz.Google Scholar
Costa, João & Maria Cristina Figueiredo Silva. 2006. “On the (In)dependence Relation between Syntax and Pragmatics”. The Architecture of Focus ed. by Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (= Studies in Generative Grammar, 82), 83–104. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1974. “Topic-comment Structure Revisited”. Topic and Comment, Contextual Boundness and Focus ed. by Östen Dahl (= Papiere zur Textlinguistik, 6/Papers in Textlinguistics, 6), 1–24. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Verner. 1921. Det Danske Sprogs Historie i Almenfattelig Fremstilling. 2nd ed. København: J. H. Schultz.Google Scholar
Ejder, Bertil. 1945. Adjektivändelsen -er i de Nordiska Språken, särskilt i Svenskan (= Lundastudier i Nordisk Språkvetenskap, 3). Lund: Gleerupska Universitets-Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Giacolone Ramat, Anna. 1998. “Testing the Boundaries of Grammaticalization”. The Limits of Grammaticalization ed. by Anna Giacolone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (= Typological Studies in Language, 37), 107–127. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, T. 1983. “Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction”. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study ed. by T. Givón (= Typological Studies in Language, 3), 1–41. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, E.V. 1927. An Introduction to Old Norse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. “Language Structure and Language Function”. New Horizons in Linguistics ed. by John Lyons, 140–165. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London, New York, Sydney & Auckland: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hansen, Aage. 1956. “Kasusudviklingen i Dansk”. Festskrift til Peter Skautrup, 183–193. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget i Aarhus.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. “On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization”. Up and Down the Cline – the Nature of Grammaticalization ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (= Typological Studies in Language, 59), 17–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. “On Degrammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2001 ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 237), 163–179. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heltoft, Lars. 1996. “Topics in Danish and in Universal Pragmatics”. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics ed. by Lars Heltoft & Hartmut Haberland, 251–262. Roskilde: Department of Language and Culture, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Eva Skafte. 2000. Danske Sætningsadverbialer og Topologi i Diakron Belysning. PhD-­afhandling ved Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
. 2002. “On the Development of Danish Sentence Adverbials”. L’infinito & Oltre. Omaggio a Gunver Skytte ed. by Hanne Jansen, Paola Polito, Lene Schøsler & Erling Strudsholm, 463–480. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Case in Middle Danish. A Double Content System”. Historical Linguistics 2001 ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 237), 221–236. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Om Udviklingen af den Ubestemte Artikel”. Ny Forskning i Grammatik. Fællespublikation 14 ed. by Merete Birkelund, Susana S. Fernández, Alexandra Kratschmer & Henning Nølke, 145–162. Odense: Syddansk Universitet.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Context Sensitive Changes. The Development of the Affirmative Markers godt ‘good’ and vel ‘well’ in Danish”. Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (= Studies in Pragmatics, 7), 64–79. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2011. Nominativ i Gammelskånsk – Afvikling og Udviklinger. København: Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund & Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Johnson, Rakel. 2003. Skrivaren och Språket. Skriftspråksbruk, Kasus och Vokaler i Medeltidsbrev på Svenska. Göteborgs Universitet: Institutionen för Svenska Språket.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2004. “Rescuing Traditional (Historical) Linguistics from Grammaticalization ‘Theory’”. Up and Down the Cline – the Nature of Grammaticalization ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (= Typological Studies in Language, 59), 44–71. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Jörgensen, Nils. 1990. Studier över Textstrukturen i Medeltida Svensk Historiografi (= Samlingar Utgivna av Svenska Fornskrift-sällskapet. Serie 1, Svenska Skrifter, häft. 259, bd. 79). Uppsala: Svenska Fornskriftsällskapet.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Language Evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Revised and Expanded Version. First Published Edition (= LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 01). München & Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2007. “Exaptation, Grammaticalization, and Reanalysis”. California Linguistic Notes 32/1.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Karl Martin. 1965. “Indledning”. Corpus Codicum Danicorum Medii Aevi VII. Legem Scaniae, Ius Ecclesiasticum Scaniae, Aliaque Continentes.København: Munksgaard. XI–XVIII.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Marita Akhøj. 2015. “Gammeldansk Formidlet til den Digitale Tidsalder”. Østnordisk Filologi – Nu og i Fremtiden ed. by Jonathan Adams, 97–108. København & Odense: Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund & Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 1997a. The History of the Genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in Degrammaticalization. PhD-thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
. 1997b. “Från Kasusändelse till Enklitisk Determinator: Genitivens Historia i Svenskan”. Studier i Svensk Språkhistoria 4 ed. by Patrik Åström (= Meddelanden från Institutionen för nordiska Språk vid Stockholms universitet, 44), 147–154. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The loss of lexical case in Swedish”. Grammatical relations in change ed. by Jan Terje Faarlund, 241–272. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Deflexion as Counterdirectional Factor in Grammatical Change”. Language Sciences 23:2/3.231–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “The Final Stages of Grammaticalization: Affixhood and Beyond”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 45–65. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nølke, Henning. 1995. “Utterance Focus. Elements of a Modular Theory”. Information Structure ed. by Michael Herslund (= Copenhagen Studies in Language, 18), 75–108. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, Stig Örjan. 1978–1979. Skånes Språkliga Försvenskning 1–2 (= Lundastudier i Nordisk Språkvetenskap. Serie A, nr. 30–31). Lund: Walter Ekstrand Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Powell, Mava Jo. 1992. “The Systematic Development of Correlated Interpersonal and Metalinguistic Uses in Stance Adverbs”. Cognitive Linguistics 3.75–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pusch, Claus D. 2006. “Marqueurs Discursifs et Subordination Syntaxique. La Construction Inférentielle en Français et dans d’autres Langues Romanes”. Les Marqueurs Discursifs dans les Langues Romanes. Approches Théoriques et Méthodologiques ed. by M. Drescher & B. Frank-­Job, 173–188. Frankfurt am Main, et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Skautrup, Peter. 1944. Det danske Sprogs Historie 1. København: Gyldendalske Boghandel & Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
. 1947. Det danske Sprogs Historie 2. København: Gyldendalske Boghandel & Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Ole. 1993. Praxt. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs. 1982. “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings; some Semantic-pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization”. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth. 2004. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies Based on Corpora ed. by Minoji Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 124), 433–445. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wessén, Elias. 1965. Svensk Språkhistoria 1. Ljudlära och Ordböjningslära. Åttonde upplagan. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1968.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2010. “Degrammaticalization and Obsolescent Morphology”. Evidence from Slavonic. Grammaticalization. Current Views and Issues ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 119), 151–177. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar