Cover not available
Part of
Afroasiatic: Data and perspectives
Edited by Mauro Tosco
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339] 2018
► pp. 85–103

The imperfective in Berber

Evidence of innovated forms and functions

This article analyzes the morphological oppositions and semantic distinctions that originate from transformation processes regarding the imperfective in Berber. The synchronic and diachronic phenomena studied in this contribution offer examples of how language is continually modulated through innovations that emerge in structurally layered and causal formations dictated by system-based properties.

Keywords: imperfective, comparative Berber, morphological verbal innovation, semantic diversification, diachronic verbal development, system-internal language change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Berber verbal system
  • 3.The negative imperfective in Berber
  • 4.Innovations in the Berber verbal system
    • 4.1Innovations in the Tuareg verb
    • 4.2Innovations in the Tarifit verb
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.339.06laf
References

References

Basset, André
1952 La langue berbère. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brugnatelli, Vermondo
2002 “Les thèmes verbaux négatifs du berbère: quelques reflexions”. Articles de linguistique berbère. Mémorial Werner Vycichl, ed. by Kamal Naït-Zerrad, 165–180. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cadi, Kaddour
1987 Système verbal rifain. Forme et sens. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Chaker, Salem
1989 “Aspect (verbe)”. Encyclopédie berbère, 7.971–977.Google Scholar
1996 “Quelques remarques préliminaires sur la négation en berbère”. La négation en berbère et en arabe marocain, ed. by Dominique Caubet and Salem Chaker, 9–22. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Galand, Lionel
1974 “Introduction grammaticale”. Contes touaregs de l’Aïr, ed. by Petites sœurs de Jésus, 13–41. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
1977 “Continuité et renouvellement d’un système verbal: le cas du berbère”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 72:1.275–303.Google Scholar
2002 Etudes de linguistique berbère. Louvain & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
2005 A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kossmann, Maarten
1989 “L’inaccompli négatif en berbère”. Études et Documents berbères 6.19–29.Google Scholar
König, Crista
2006 “Marked Nominative in Africa”. Studies in Language 30:4.705–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafkioui Mena
2006 “La vocalisation des alvéolaires /r/ et /rr/ dans les variétés berbères du Rif”. Studien zur Berberologie/Etudes Berbères 3, ed. by Dymitr Ibriszimow, Rainer Vossen & Harry Stroomer, 175–184. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Lafkioui, Mena
2007 Atlas linguistique des variétés berbères du Rif. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
2009 “Synchronic and Diachronic Linguistic Variation as an Indicator of Language Change and Diffusion in Tarifit”. Studi Maġribini (Nuova Serie) 7.65–84.Google Scholar
2011 “How System-Internal Linguistic Factors Indicate Language Change and Diffusion: A Geolinguistic Analysis of Berber Data”. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 19.62–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. “Dialectology and Linguistic Geography”. Handbook of African languages ed. by Rainer Vossen Oxford Oxford University Press
Lafkioui, Mena & Maarten Kossmann
2009 “Les inaccomplis du Tarifit”. L’Amazighe dans l’Oriental et le Nord du Maroc: variations et convergences, ed. by Aïcha Bouhjar & Hamid Souifi, 101–108. Rabat: Editions IRCAM.Google Scholar
Leguil, Alphonse
1987 “Les quatre inaccomplis du touareg de l’Adagh”. Proceedings of the Fourth Hamito-Semitic Congress (Marburg, 20–22 September 1983), ed. by Herrmann Jungraithmayr & Walter W. Mueller, 395–406. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Une opposition fluctuante en touareg”. Etudes berbères et chamito-sémitiques. Mélanges offerts à Karl-G. Prasse, ed. by Salem Chaker and Andrzej Zaborski, 257–262. Paris & Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Mammeri, Mouloud
1980 Poèmes kabyles anciens. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen J.
1990 A Cognitive Approach to the Typology of Verbal Aspect. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Picard, André
1959 “Du preterit intensif en berbère”. Memorial André Basset (1895–1956), 107–120. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Prasse, Karl-G
1973 Manuel de grammaire touarègue. Volume: Verbe. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Prasse, Karl-G. & ăgg-Ălbosṭan ăgg-Sidiyăn, Ekhya
1985 Tableaux morphologiques. Dialecte touareg de l’Adrar du Mali (berbère). Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Schmid, Maureen A.
1980 Co-occurrence Restrictions in Negative, Interrogative, and Conditional Clauses: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Van den Boogert, Nico
1997 The Berber Literary Tradition of the Sous – With an Edition and Translation of the ‘Ocean of Tears’ by Muḥammad Awzal (d. 1749). Leiden: de Goeie Fund.Google Scholar
Vycichl, Werner
1953–1955 “Der Umlaut in den Berbersprachen Nordafrikas. Eine Einführung in die berberische Sprachgeschichte”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 52.304–325.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lafkioui, Mena B.
2018. Geolinguistic complexity in Berber. Structural and algorithmic perspectives. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 26:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Lafkioui, Mena B.
2020. Rif Berber: From Senhaja to Iznasen. A qualitative and quantitative approach to classification. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 28:1 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.