Cover not available
Part of
Afroasiatic: Data and perspectives
Edited by Mauro Tosco
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339] 2018
► pp. 153–165

Insubordination in Modern South Arabian

A common isogloss with Ethiosemitic?

The term ‘insubordination’ is used to describe the case of a subordinate verb becoming the main verb of a sentence. In Modern South Arabian (MSA) a relative verb without an antecedent may act as the finite verb of an independent sentence. The MSA main relative verb is analyzed as the equivalent of an active participle together with copula zero, which leads to a comparison with Amharic and other modern Ethiosemitic (ES) languages in which a relative verb, followed by the copula – mandatory in these languages – is often used as the main predicate. After a review of the main points of convergence between modern ES and MSA in general, the function of the ES relative, plus copula, is analyzed as static predication as opposed to the dynamic predication of the ordinary verb. It appears in introductory passages of a literary text where the characteristics of the main character are presented.
Keywords: relative verb, predicalization of relative verbs, common features between MSA and MES
Published online: 1 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.339.09kap
References (55)
References
Appleyard, David L. 1975. “A Descriptive Outline of Kemant”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 37.316–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristoteles. 1963. Categories and De Interpretatione, translated with notes by J. L. Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bausi, Alessandro. 1990. “La frase relativa nelle lingue semitiche d’Etiopia”. Quaderni di Dipartimento di Linguistica. Firenze 1. 105–123.Google Scholar
Borghero, Roberta. 2015. “The Present Continuous in the Neo-Aramaic Dialect of ʿAnkawa and Its Areal and Typological Parallels”. Neo-Aramaic and Its Linguistic Context, ed. by Geoffrey Khan & Lidia Napiorkowska, 187–206. Piscataway, Gorgias Press.Google Scholar
Bulakh, Maria, Leonid Kogan & Olga Romanova (eds.). 2013. Semitic Languages: Ethiosemitic Languages. Moscow, Academia: 13–141 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Cerulli, Enrico. 1934–1937. “Le mode relatif en couchitique”. Groupe Linguistique d’Études Chamito-Sémitiques 2.61–63.Google Scholar
Cerulli, Enrico. 1938. Studi Etiopici II – La lingua e la storia dei Sidamo. Roma: Istituto per l’Oriente.Google Scholar
Cerulli, Enrico. 1951. Studi Etiopici IV – La lingua caffina. Roma: Istituto per l’Oriente.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marcel. 1936. Traité de langue amharique. Paris: Institut d’Ethnologie.Google Scholar
Conti-Rossini, Carlo. 1912. La langue des Kemantes en Abyssinie. Wien: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Dillmann, August. 1865. Lexicon Linguae Aethiopicae. Leipzig: Weigel (reprinted in 1955).Google Scholar
. 1907. Ethiopic Grammar, translated by J. A. Crichton. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. “Insubordination and Its Uses”. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edzard, Lutz. 2001. “Adjektive und nominalisierte Relativsätze im Semitischen: Versuch einer Typologie”. New Data and New Methods in Afroasiatic Linguistics ed. by Andrzej Zaborski, 39–52. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Garad, Abdurahman & Ewald Wagner. 1998. Harari-Studien. Texte mit Übersetzung, grammatischen Skizzen und Glossar (Semitica Viva 18). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Joseph. 1980. Amharische Grammatik (Aethiopistische Forschungen 3). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 1969. The Verbal System of Southern Agaw. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. “The Agaw Languages”. Afroasiatic Linguistics: 3:3.31–75.Google Scholar
. 1977. The Gunnän-Gurage Languages. Napoli: Istituto Orientale.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Thomas M. 1975. “The Modern South Arabian Languages”. Afroasiatic Linguistics 1:5.93–121.Google Scholar
1987. Mehri Lexicon with English-Mehri Word List. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Kane Thomas L. 1990. Amharic-English Dictionary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, Olga. 1980a. “Évolution de la phrase amharique : la nominalisation du verbe”. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, Session A – Nice 1977, 97–106. Rotterdam: Balkema. [id 2009: 310–318].Google Scholar
. 1980b. “Sur le rôle de la forme relative en tigrigna” – Review of R.M. Voigt: Das tigrinische Verbalsystem. Bibliotheca Orientalis 37:1–2.16–23 [id 2009: 463–479].Google Scholar
. 1981. “Il semble que’ ou ‘Il semble qui’ – un problème de syntaxe amharique”. Studies Presented to H.J. Polotsky, ed. by D. H. Young, 51–67. Gloucester: Pirtle & Polson. [id 2009: 319–331].Google Scholar
. 1985. “La phrase coupée en guèze”. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Maxime Rodinson, ed. by Christian Robin, 191–204. Paris: Guethner. [id 2009: 185–198].Google Scholar
. 1988. Nominalization in Amharic (Aethiopistische Forschungen 23). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
. 1994. Syntax of the Noun in Amharic (Aethiopistische Forschungen 37). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2002. “The Relative Verb in Amharic in Areal Perspective”. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere: 71.33–54 [id 2009: 408–429].Google Scholar
. 2003. “ Za-motna nəḥna wa-za-nagasna nəḥna: Notes on Relative and Correlative Constructions in Gəʿəz”. Aethiopica 6.177–191 [id. 2009: 224–238].Google Scholar
. 2009. Selected Papers in Ethio-Semitic and Neo-Aramaic Linguistics. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magness Press.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, Olga. 2017. “Studies in Ethiopian Languages, Literature, and History - Festschrift for Getatchew Haile, ed. by A. C. McCollum, 575–585. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1945. “The Influence of Cushitic on the Semitic Languages of Ethiopia”. Word 1.59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Comparative Dictionary of Geʿez. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1995. Reference Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lonnet, Antoine. 2005. “Quelques réflexions sur le verbe sud-arabique”. Studi Afroasiatici – XI Incontro Italiano di Linguistica Camitosemitica ed. by Alessandro Mengozzi, 187–202. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Nakano, Akio. 1986. Comparative vocabulary of Southern Arabic. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Pennacchietti, Fabrizio A. 1993. “Le forme verbali pseudorelative: isoglossa strutturale del semitico sud-occidentale”. Semitica – Serta Philologica Constantini Tsereteli Dicata, ed. by Riccardo Contini, Fabrizio A. Pennacchietti & Mauro Tosco, 213–225. Torino: Zamorani.Google Scholar
2007. “L’impiego di frasi pseudorelative come verbi finiti”. Relative e Pseudorelative tra Grammatica e Testo, ed. by Federica Venier, 133–148. Alessandria: dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Polotsky, Hans J. 1944. Études de syntaxe copte. Cairo: Société d’Archéologie Copte.Google Scholar
Praetorius, Franz. 1886. Aethiopische Grammatik. New York: Ungar (reprinted 1955).Google Scholar
Reinisch, Leo. 1882. Die Bilin-Sprache in Nordost-Afrika. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Phil.-Hist. Classe: 9.583–718.Google Scholar
. 1884. Die Chamirsprache in Abessinien. Wien: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
. 1885–1887. Die Quarasprache in Abessinien. Wien:Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2010. The Mehri Language of Oman (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 58). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sandmann, Manfred. 1954. Subject and Predicate. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Simeone-Senelle, Marie-Claude. 1997. “The Modern South Arabian Languages”. The Semitic Languages, ed. by Robert Hetzron, 378–423. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stroomer, Harry. 1999. Mehri Texts from Oman (Semitica Viva 22). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Tubiana, Joseph. 1960. A Remark in a Discussion. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Ethiopian Studies – Rome April 1959. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Voigt, Rainer. 1994. “Neusüdarabisch und Äthiopisch”. Arabia Felix: Festschrift Walter W. Müller zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. by Rosemarie Richter, Ingo Kottsieper & Mohammed Maraqten, 291–307. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wagner, Ewald. 1953. Syntax der Mehri-Sprache. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Gedanken zum Verb des Mehri aufgrund der neuen Materialien von Johnstone”. Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik 25.316–339.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Neues Material zum Studium des Neusüd-arabischen: Die Stroomer’sche Edition der Mehri-Texte von Johnstone”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. 91.331–346.Google Scholar
Yediot Nəgat. A bi-monthly magazine in Hebrew, Amharic and Tigrinya published in Jerusalem by the Israeli daily Yediot Aharonot.
Zaborski, Andrzej. 2007. “Notes on the Reconstruction of the ‘Prefix-Conjugation’ in the Modern South Arabian Languages”. Lingua Posnaniensis 49.196–206.Google Scholar