Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change: Spanish across space and time
Edited by Jeremy King and Sandro Sessarego
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 340] 2018
► pp. 127–151

Chapter 6
Hasta perder la última gota de mi sangre

Variation in commissive speech act behavior in Colonial Louisiana Spanish

In spite of the recent burgeoning of the field of Spanish socio-pragmatics, the category of commissive speech acts has been all but ignored in scholarship, particularly in contact varieties of the language. Colonial Louisiana presents an ideal context for this type of work. The analysis herein involves a corpus of 100 business letters between Spanish government and military officials in 18th century Louisiana. All commissive speech acts were identified and coded according to a modified version of the taxonomy presented in Bilbow (2002). Results of the study reveal that the level of power of the speaker (= letter writer) proved to be the most significant factor in the formulation of commissives. The level of relative power of a speaker appeared to guide not only the general type of commissives employed (e.g., promises vs. offers) but also the specific morphological expression of the speech act (e.g., future vs. present tense).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Commissive speech acts and the Spanish language
  • 3.Description of corpus and method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Examples of commissive strategies
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.340.07kin
References (86)
References
Agyekum, Kofi. 2004. “Ntam ‘Reminiscential Oath’ Taboo in Akan”. Language in Society 33:3.317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Astington, Janet W. 1988. “Children’s Production of Commissive Speech Acts”. Journal of Child Language 15:2.411–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 2003. “Spanish Forms of Address in the Sixteenth Century”. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems ed. by Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas Jucker, 177–191. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernaerts, Lars. 2010. “Interactions in Cuckoo’s Nest: Elements of a Narrative Speech-Act Analysis”. Narrative 18:3.276–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, Josie & Virginie Laval. 1996. “Promises in French Children: Comprehension and Metapragmatic Knowledge”. Journal of Pragmatics 25.101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, Grahame T. 2002. “Commissive Speech Act Use in Intercultural Business Meetings”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40.287–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics 11.131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper, eds. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Boix Jovaní, Alfonso. 2012. “Promesas y juramentos en el Cantar de Mio Cid ”. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 89:1.1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot M. 2003. “Two Kinds of Commitments (and Two Kinds of Social Groups)”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66:3.554–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies”. Language in Society 18.159–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruder, Kurt A. 1998. “A Pragmatics for Human Relationship with the Divine: An Examination of the Monastic Blessing Sequence”. Journal of Pragmatics 29.463–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byers, A. Martin. 1999. “Intentionality, Symbolic Pragmatics, and Material Culture: Revisiting Binford’s View of the Old Copper Complex”. American Antiquity 64:2.265–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Vitor R. & William W. Cohen. 2005. “On the Collective Classification of Email ‘Speech Acts’”. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval ed. by Gary Marchioni et al.., 345–352. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Chodorowska-Pilch, Marianna. 2002. “Las ofertas y la cortesía en español peninsular”. Actos de habla y cortesía ed. by María E. Placencia & Diana Bravo, 21–36. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Csordas, Thomas J. 1997. “Prophecy and the Performance of Metaphor”. American Anthropologist 99:2.321–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Dawn Archer. 2008. “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts, 1640–1760”. Speech Acts in the History of English ed. by Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen, 45–84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2000. “Data in Historical Pragmatics: Spoken Interaction (Re)cast as Writing.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1:2.175–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda. 1980. “Language in the Legal Process”. Law & Society Review 14:3.445–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeJong, Huib M. & Wouter G. Werner. 1998. “Continuity and Change in Legal Positivism”. Law and Philosophy 17:3.233–250.Google Scholar
Desilva, David A. 1994. “Despising Shame: A Cultural-Anthropological Investigation of the Epistle to the Hebrews”. Journal of Biblical Literature 113:3.439–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Din, Gilbert C. 1988. The Canary Islanders of Louisiana. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
1996. “Spain’s Immigration Policy in Louisiana and the American Penetration, 1792–1803”. The Louisiana Purchase Bicentennial Series in Louisiana History, vol. 2, The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763–1803 ed. by Gilbert C. Din, 334–351. Lafayette, Louisiana: Center for Louisiana Studies of the University of Southwestern Louisiana.Google Scholar
Dippold, Doris. 2007. “Using Speech Frames to Research Interlanguage Pragmatics: Facework Strategies in L2 German Argument”. Journal of Applied Linguistics 4:3.285–308.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2003. “Declining an Invitation: A Cross-Cultural Study of Pragmatic Strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish”. Multilingua 22.225–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Linguistic Politeness in Mexico: Refusal Strategies among Male Speakers of Mexican Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 38.2158–2187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan M. 2002. The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Judith. 2003. “Women and Oaths in Euripides”. Theatre Journal 55:1.29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, María B. 1994. “Fórmulas de tratamiento en el español americano (siglos XVI y XVII)”. El español en el nuevo mundo ed. by María B. Fontanella de Weinberg, 7–31.Washington:Organización de los Estados Americanos.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce & William Nolen. 1981. “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27.93–109.Google Scholar
Galveztown Papers. n.d. Ms. 890, Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Valley Collections. Baton Rouge: LSU Libraries.
García, Carmen. 1992. “Refusing an Invitation: A Case of Peruvian Style”. Hispanic Linguistics 5:1–2.207–243.Google Scholar
. 1999. “The Three Stages of Venezuelan Invitations and Responses”. Multilingua 18:4.391–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “‘Ché, mirá, vos sabés que no voy a poder’: How Argentineans Refuse an Invitation”. Hispania 90:3.551–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, Silvia. 2000. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Future Tenses in Spanish”. Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium ed. by Héctor Campos et al.., 264–281. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael. 1979. “The Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 8:1.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Karol J. 2001. Pragmatics of Persuasive Discourse in Spanish Television Advertising. Arlington, Texas: SIL International / University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2008. “Intention in Pragmatics”. Intercultural Pragmatics 5:2.99–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1994. La cortesía verbal: Estudio pragmalingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Holmes, Jack D. L. 1996. “The Provincial Governor-General: Manuel Gayoso de Lemos”. The Louisiana Purchase Bicentennial Series in Louisiana History, vol. 2,The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763–1803 ed. by Gilbert C. Din, 94–112. Lafayette, Louisiana: Center for Louisiana Studies of the University of Southwestern Louisiana.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas. 2005. “The Production and Perception of Implicit Performatives”. Journal of Pragmatics 37.2024–2043. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2010. “Speech Acts”. Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics ed. by Alex Barber & Robert J. Stainton, 705–714. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hurley, Joni Kay. 1995. “Pragmatics in a Language Contact Situation: Verb Forms Used in Requests in Ecuadorian Spanish.” Hispanic Linguistics 6–7.225–264.Google Scholar
Johansson, Ingvar. 2003. “Performatives and Antiperformatives”. Linguistics and Philosophy 26:6.661–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Jeremy. 2010. “Pleas from the New World: The Structure of Directive Head Acts in Colonial Spanish Familiar Letters”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11:2.250–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Power and Indirectness in Business Correspondence: Petitions in Colonial Louisiana Spanish”. Journal of Politeness Research 7.259–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2009. “Illocutionary Forces and What Is Said”. Mind & Language 24:1.122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knops, Andrew. 2006. “Delivering Deliberation’s Emancipatory Potential”. Political Theory 34:5.594–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Gerald James. 1978. “Prolegomenon to a Theory of Religion”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 46:4.443–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Liu, Si. 2011. “An Experimental Study of the Classification and Recognition of Chinese Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 43.1801–1817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & María Elena Placencia. 2005. Spanish Pragmatics. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCallam, David. 2003. “The Nature of Libertine Promises in Laclos’s Les liaisons dangereuses ”. The Modern Language Review 98:4.857–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Lee C. 1969. “Myth, Politics and Political Science”. The Western Political Quarterly 22:1.141–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montero de Pedro, José. 2000. The Spanish in New Orleans and Louisiana. Trans. Richard E. Chandler. Gretna, Louisiana: Pelican.Google Scholar
Myhill, John. 1996. “The Development of the Strong Obligation System in American English.” American Speech 71:4.339–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natsopoulous, Demetrios, Grouious, George, Bostantzopoulou, Sevasti, Mentenopoulos, Georges, Katsarou, Zoe & Jim Logothetis 1993. “Algorithmic and Heuristic Strategies in Comprehension of Complement Clauses by Patients with Parkinson’s Disease”. Neuropsychologia 31:9.951–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, David R. 2007. “Self-Ascription of Intention: Responsibility, Obligation and Self-Control”. Synthese 159:2.297–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena. 2001. “The Directive-Commissive Continuum”. Miscelánea 23.77–98.Google Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza. 2002. “Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 34.259–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Person, Raymond F. 2009. “‘Oh’ in Shakespeare: A Conversation Analytic Approach”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10:1.84–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polansky, Susan G. 1988. “Textual Coherence in the Duke of Rivas’s El desengaño en un sueño: The Dramaturgy of Destiny”. Modern Language Studies 18:3.3–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rall, Marlene. 1993. “‘Mañana te hablo’: La deixis temporal en el acto de la promesa y su entorno cultural”. Discurso 15.1–15.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. “The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy”. Language in Society 11:2.203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani. 2004. “‘I wol sterve’: Negotiating the Issue of a Lady’s Consent in Chaucer’s Poetry”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5:1.137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1987. “Sentence Structures in Colloquial Shakespearian English”. A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama ed. by Vivian Salmon & Edwina Burness, 265–300. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, Marta E. 1980. “Inter-Sexual and Intertextual Codes in the Poetry of Bernice Zamora”. Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States 7:3.55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2001. “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use”. Journal of Pragmatics 33.1791–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Suzanne Wong Scollon. 2001. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 5:1.1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes. 2007. “Future Tense Expressions in Several Spanish Corpora”. Working with Spanish Corpora ed. by Giovanni Parodi, 132–144. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sitter, Stefan & Adelheit Stein. 1992. “Modeling the Illocutionary Aspects of Information-Seeking Dialogues”. Information Processing & Management 28:2.165–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. “Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language”. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 439–465. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M. 1986. “The Language of Offer and Acceptance: Speech Acts and the Question of Intent”. California Law Review 74:1.189– 232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. “Linguistic Issues in the Law”. Language 69:1.113–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. “Statutes and Contracts: An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in the English Language of the Law”. Journal of Pragmatics 23.31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1983. “Review of Speech Act Classification: A Study in The Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs ”. Language 59:1.166–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline. 2009. “Speech Acts in Legal Language: Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics 41.393–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Thomas D. 1996. “A Scheme Gone Awry: Bernardo de Gálvez, Gilberto Antonio de St. Maxent, and the Southern Indian Trade”. The Louisiana Purchase Bicentennial Series in Louisiana History, vol. 2, The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763–1803 ed. by Gilbert C. Din, 307–316. Lafayette, Louisiana: Center for Louisiana Studies of the University of Southwestern Louisiana.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wisse, Maarten. 2000. “The Meaning of the Authority of the Bible”. Religious Studies 36:4.473–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

King, Jeremy
2019. Commitment fulfillment and politeness. In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
King, Jeremy
2024.  You have no right! . Pragmatics and Society DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.