Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change: Spanish across space and time
Edited by Jeremy King and Sandro Sessarego
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 340] 2018
► pp. 127–151

Chapter 6
Hasta perder la última gota de mi sangre

Variation in commissive speech act behavior in Colonial Louisiana Spanish

In spite of the recent burgeoning of the field of Spanish socio-pragmatics, the category of commissive speech acts has been all but ignored in scholarship, particularly in contact varieties of the language. Colonial Louisiana presents an ideal context for this type of work. The analysis herein involves a corpus of 100 business letters between Spanish government and military officials in 18th century Louisiana. All commissive speech acts were identified and coded according to a modified version of the taxonomy presented in Bilbow (2002). Results of the study reveal that the level of power of the speaker (= letter writer) proved to be the most significant factor in the formulation of commissives. The level of relative power of a speaker appeared to guide not only the general type of commissives employed (e.g., promises vs. offers) but also the specific morphological expression of the speech act (e.g., future vs. present tense).

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Commissive speech acts and the Spanish language
  • 3.Description of corpus and method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Examples of commissive strategies
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.340.07kin
References
Agyekum, Kofi
2004 “Ntam ‘Reminiscential Oath’ Taboo in Akan”. Language in Society 33:3.317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Astington, Janet W.
1988 “Children’s Production of Commissive Speech Acts”. Journal of Child Language 15:2.411–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola
2003 “Spanish Forms of Address in the Sixteenth Century”. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems ed. by Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas Jucker, 177–191. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernaerts, Lars
2010 “Interactions in Cuckoo’s Nest: Elements of a Narrative Speech-Act Analysis”. Narrative 18:3.276–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, Josie & Virginie Laval
1996 “Promises in French Children: Comprehension and Metapragmatic Knowledge”. Journal of Pragmatics 25.101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, Grahame T.
2002 “Commissive Speech Act Use in Intercultural Business Meetings”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40.287–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1987 “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics 11.131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper
eds 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Boix Jovaní, Alfonso
2012 “Promesas y juramentos en el Cantar de Mio Cid ”. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 89:1.1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot M.
2003 “Two Kinds of Commitments (and Two Kinds of Social Groups)”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66:3.554–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman
1989 “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies”. Language in Society 18.159–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruder, Kurt A.
1998 “A Pragmatics for Human Relationship with the Divine: An Examination of the Monastic Blessing Sequence”. Journal of Pragmatics 29.463–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byers, A. Martin
1999 “Intentionality, Symbolic Pragmatics, and Material Culture: Revisiting Binford’s View of the Old Copper Complex”. American Antiquity 64:2.265–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Vitor R. & William W. Cohen
2005 “On the Collective Classification of Email ‘Speech Acts’”. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval ed. by Gary Marchioni et al.., 345–352. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Chodorowska-Pilch, Marianna
2002 “Las ofertas y la cortesía en español peninsular”. Actos de habla y cortesía ed. by María E. Placencia & Diana Bravo, 21–36. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Csordas, Thomas J.
1997 “Prophecy and the Performance of Metaphor”. American Anthropologist 99:2.321–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Dawn Archer
2008 “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts, 1640–1760”. Speech Acts in the History of English ed. by Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen, 45–84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö
2000 “Data in Historical Pragmatics: Spoken Interaction (Re)cast as Writing.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1:2.175–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda
1980 “Language in the Legal Process”. Law & Society Review 14:3.445–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeJong, Huib M. & Wouter G. Werner
1998 “Continuity and Change in Legal Positivism”. Law and Philosophy 17:3.233–250.Google Scholar
Desilva, David A.
1994 “Despising Shame: A Cultural-Anthropological Investigation of the Epistle to the Hebrews”. Journal of Biblical Literature 113:3.439–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Din, Gilbert C.
1988 The Canary Islanders of Louisiana. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “Spain’s Immigration Policy in Louisiana and the American Penetration, 1792–1803”. The Louisiana Purchase Bicentennial Series in Louisiana History, vol. 2, The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763–1803 ed. by Gilbert C. Din, 334–351. Lafayette, Louisiana: Center for Louisiana Studies of the University of Southwestern Louisiana.Google Scholar
Dippold, Doris
2007 “Using Speech Frames to Research Interlanguage Pragmatics: Facework Strategies in L2 German Argument”. Journal of Applied Linguistics 4:3.285–308.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
2003 “Declining an Invitation: A Cross-Cultural Study of Pragmatic Strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish”. Multilingua 22.225–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Linguistic Politeness in Mexico: Refusal Strategies among Male Speakers of Mexican Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 38.2158–2187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan M.
2002 The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1982 The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Judith
2003 “Women and Oaths in Euripides”. Theatre Journal 55:1.29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, María B
1994 “Fórmulas de tratamiento en el español americano (siglos XVI y XVII)”. El español en el nuevo mundo ed. by María B. Fontanella de Weinberg, 7–31.Washington:Organización de los Estados Americanos.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce & William Nolen
1981 “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27.93–109.Google Scholar
Galveztown Papers. n.d. Ms. 890
Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Valley Collections. Baton Rouge: LSU Libraries.
García, Carmen
1992 “Refusing an Invitation: A Case of Peruvian Style”. Hispanic Linguistics 5:1–2.207–243.Google Scholar
1999 “The Three Stages of Venezuelan Invitations and Responses”. Multilingua 18:4.391–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “ ‘Ché, mirá, vos sabés que no voy a poder’: How Argentineans Refuse an Invitation”. Hispania 90:3.551–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, Silvia
2000 “Semantics and Pragmatics of Future Tenses in Spanish”. Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium ed. by Héctor Campos et al.., 264–281. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael
1979 “The Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 8:1.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Karol J.
2001 Pragmatics of Persuasive Discourse in Spanish Television Advertising. Arlington, Texas: SIL International / University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2008 “Intention in Pragmatics”. Intercultural Pragmatics 5:2.99–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
1994 La cortesía verbal: Estudio pragmalingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Holmes, Jack D. L.
1996 “The Provincial Governor-General: Manuel Gayoso de Lemos”. The Louisiana Purchase Bicentennial Series in Louisiana History, vol. 2,The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763–1803 ed. by Gilbert C. Din, 94–112. Lafayette, Louisiana: Center for Louisiana Studies of the University of Southwestern Louisiana.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas
2005 “The Production and Perception of Implicit Performatives”. Journal of Pragmatics 37.2024–2043. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
2010 “Speech Acts”. Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics ed. by Alex Barber & Robert J. Stainton, 705–714. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hurley, Joni Kay
1995 “Pragmatics in a Language Contact Situation: Verb Forms Used in Requests in Ecuadorian Spanish.” Hispanic Linguistics 6–7.225–264.Google Scholar
Johansson, Ingvar
2003 “Performatives and Antiperformatives”. Linguistics and Philosophy 26:6.661–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Jeremy
2010 “Pleas from the New World: The Structure of Directive Head Acts in Colonial Spanish Familiar Letters”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11:2.250–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Power and Indirectness in Business Correspondence: Petitions in Colonial Louisiana Spanish”. Journal of Politeness Research 7.259–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2009 “Illocutionary Forces and What Is Said”. Mind & Language 24:1.122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knops, Andrew
2006 “Delivering Deliberation’s Emancipatory Potential”. Political Theory 34:5.594–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Gerald James
1978 “Prolegomenon to a Theory of Religion”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 46:4.443–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Liu, Si
2011 “An Experimental Study of the Classification and Recognition of Chinese Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 43.1801–1817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & María Elena Placencia
2005 Spanish Pragmatics. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCallam, David
2003 “The Nature of Libertine Promises in Laclos’s Les liaisons dangereuses ”. The Modern Language Review 98:4.857–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Lee C.
1969 “Myth, Politics and Political Science”. The Western Political Quarterly 22:1.141–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montero de Pedro, José
2000 The Spanish in New Orleans and Louisiana. Trans. Richard E. Chandler. Gretna, Louisiana: Pelican.Google Scholar
Myhill, John
1996 “The Development of the Strong Obligation System in American English.” American Speech 71:4.339–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natsopoulous, Demetrios, Grouious, George, Bostantzopoulou, Sevasti, Mentenopoulos, Georges, Katsarou, Zoe & Jim Logothetis
1993 “Algorithmic and Heuristic Strategies in Comprehension of Complement Clauses by Patients with Parkinson’s Disease”. Neuropsychologia 31:9.951–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, David R.
2007 “Self-Ascription of Intention: Responsibility, Obligation and Self-Control”. Synthese 159:2.297–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena
2001 “The Directive-Commissive Continuum”. Miscelánea 23.77–98.Google Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza
2002 “Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 34.259–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Person, Raymond F.
2009 “ ‘Oh’ in Shakespeare: A Conversation Analytic Approach”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10:1.84–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polansky, Susan G.
1988 “Textual Coherence in the Duke of Rivas’s El desengaño en un sueño: The Dramaturgy of Destiny”. Modern Language Studies 18:3.3–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rall, Marlene
1993 “ ‘Mañana te hablo’: La deixis temporal en el acto de la promesa y su entorno cultural”. Discurso 15.1–15.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z.
1982 “The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy”. Language in Society 11:2.203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
2004 “ ‘I wol sterve’: Negotiating the Issue of a Lady’s Consent in Chaucer’s Poetry”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5:1.137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Vivian
1987 “Sentence Structures in Colloquial Shakespearian English”. A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama ed. by Vivian Salmon & Edwina Burness, 265–300. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, Marta E.
1980 “Inter-Sexual and Intertextual Codes in the Poetry of Bernice Zamora”. Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States 7:3.55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use”. Journal of Pragmatics 33.1791–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Suzanne Wong Scollon
2001 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 5:1.1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes
2007 “Future Tense Expressions in Several Spanish Corpora”. Working with Spanish Corpora ed. by Giovanni Parodi, 132–144. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sitter, Stefan & Adelheit Stein
1992 “Modeling the Illocutionary Aspects of Information-Seeking Dialogues”. Information Processing & Management 28:2.165–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
1995 “Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language”. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 439–465. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M.
1986 “The Language of Offer and Acceptance: Speech Acts and the Question of Intent”. California Law Review 74:1.189– 232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “Linguistic Issues in the Law”. Language 69:1.113–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
1995 “Statutes and Contracts: An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in the English Language of the Law”. Journal of Pragmatics 23.31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel
1990 Meaning and Speech Acts, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1983 “Review of Speech Act Classification: A Study in The Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs ”. Language 59:1.166–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2009 “Speech Acts in Legal Language: Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics 41.393–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Thomas D
1996 “A Scheme Gone Awry: Bernardo de Gálvez, Gilberto Antonio de St. Maxent, and the Southern Indian Trade”. The Louisiana Purchase Bicentennial Series in Louisiana History, vol. 2, The Spanish Presence in Louisiana 1763–1803 ed. by Gilbert C. Din, 307–316. Lafayette, Louisiana: Center for Louisiana Studies of the University of Southwestern Louisiana.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wisse, Maarten
2000 “The Meaning of the Authority of the Bible”. Religious Studies 36:4.473–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

King, Jeremy
2019. Chapter 4. Commitment fulfillment and politeness. In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.