Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 3579
References

References

Adami, Rebecca
2015Paideia and cosmopolitan education: On subjectification, politics and justice. Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 4(2). 68–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning
1973Abductive and deductive change. Language 49. 765–793.Google Scholar
1974Towards a typology of change: Bifurcating changes and binary relations. In J. M. Anderson & C. Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics , vol. II, 17–60. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1984Language structure and semiotic processes. In: Arbejdspapirer fra Institut for Lingvistik ved Københavns Universitet 3.33–54.Google Scholar
1988Center and periphery: adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical Dialectology, Regional and Social, 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Understanding linguistic innovations. In Leiv Erik Breivik & Ernst Hakon Jahr (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes [Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 43], 5–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990The structure of drift. In H. Andersen & K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987: Papers from the 8th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 66], 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Review ofM. Shapiro (ed.), The Peirce seminar papers: Essays in semiotic analysis, vol. 4. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Language and Peircean Sign Theory, Duke University (June 19-21, 1997). New York: Berghahn 1999 Language 77 (2). 373–376.Google Scholar
2005The plasticity of universal grammar. In W. Østreng (ed.), Convergence. Interdisciplinary Communications 2004/2005, 21–26. Oslo: Centre for Advanced Studies at the Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
2006Synchrony, diachrony, and evolution. In Ole N. Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change. Evolution and beyond [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 279], 59–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Abduction. In I. Roberts & A. Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, 301–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, Albert
2004Charles Sanders Peirce: Architectonic philosophy. In James Fieser & Bradley Dowdy (eds,), The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 2161-0002, http://​www​.iep​.utm​.edu​/peircear/. (Accessed 09.10.2017)Google Scholar
Bellucci, Francesco & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
N.d. Charles Sanders Peirce: Logic. In James Fieser & Bradley Dowdy eds. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
ISSN 2161-0002
Bergman, Mats
2014Capturing Cerberus: The Rhetorical Path to General Semiotics. The Commens Working Papers 1. Retrieved from Commens: Digital Companion to C. S. Peirce (http://​www​.commens​.org​/papers​/paper​/bergman​-mats​-2014​-capturing​-cerberus​-rhetorical​-path​-general​-semiotics).Google Scholar
Brier, Søren
2001Cybersemiotics and Umweltslehre. Semiotica 134 (1/4). 779–814.Google Scholar
2008Cybersemiotics: Why Information is not enough. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
2009Levels of Cybersemiotics: Possible ontologies of signification. Cognitive Semiotics 4. 28–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunson, Daniel J.
2010Pragmatism and the past – Charles Peirce and the conduct of memory and history. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Chiara, Ambrosio
2016The Historicity of Peirce’s Classification of the Sciences. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 (2). 9–43.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1974 [Herman Parret Discussing language with:] Noam Chomsky. In Herman Parret (ed.), Discussing Language, 27–54. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
2000The Architecture of Language. The Delhi Lectures, January 1996. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1952Sistema, norma y habla. Revista de la Facutad de Humanidades y Ciencias 9. 113–181.Google Scholar
1957Sincronía, diacronía e historia. El problema del cambio lingüístico. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias 15. 201–355. (3rd edn. 1978 Madrid: Editorial Gredos.)Google Scholar
1968Sicronía, diacronía y tipología. In Actas del XI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas, Madrid 1965, vol. 1. 269–281.Google Scholar
1977 Linguistic (and other) Universals. In A. Makkai, V. Becker Makkai & L. Heilmann (eds.), Linguistics at the Crossroads, 317–346. Padua and Lake Bluff: Liviana Editrice and Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
1980Der Sinn der Sprachtypologie. In Torben Thrane, M. Winge, Lachlan Mackenzie, Una Canger & Niels Ege (eds.), Typology and Genetics of Language [Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 20], 150–170. Copenhagen: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
1983Linguistic change does not exist. Linguistica Nuova ed Antica 1. 51–63.Google Scholar
1985Linguistic competence. What is it really? The Modern Language Review 80 (Section 4). 25–35.Google Scholar
1988Die Ebenen des sprachlichen Wissens. Der Ort des “Korrekten” in der Bewertungsskala des Gesprochenen. In J. Albrecht, J. Lüdtke & H. Thun (eds.), Energeia und Ergon: Sprachliche Variation – Sprachgeschichte – Sproachtypologie, vol. 1: 327–364. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles
1871The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (1st edn). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy
2002On the Misuse of the Notion of ‘Abduction’ in Linguistics. Journal of Linguistics 38. 469–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson
2009The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W[illiam]. Tecumseh
2006The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspectiveCognition 100. 173–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, William Tecumseh
2007Evolving Meaning: The roles of Kin Selection, Allomothering and Paternal Care in language evolution. In C. Lyon, C. Nehaniv & A. Cangelosi (eds.), Emergence of Communication and Language, 29–51. New York NY: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guardiano, Nicholas
2011The Intelligibility of Peirce’s Metaphysics of Objective Idealism. Cognitio 12 (2). 187–204.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter
2014Variation, structure and norms. In M. Pütz, J. Robinson & M. Reif (eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Social and cultural variation in cognition and language use [Benjamins Current Topics, vol. 59], 53–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy
1988Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, Lisamarie Bensman, Paul D. Thornton, Richard L. Rapson
2014New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona 8(2): 159–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James R.
1991The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition 40. 159–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
2011On Coseriu’s legacy. Energeia III. 1–29.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2010Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. In R. Larson, V. Déprez & H. Yamakido (eds.), The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives, 63–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language 87. 586–624.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Steven Pinker
2005The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser & Chomsky). Cognition 97. 211–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Eva Wittenberg
2017Linear Grammar as a possible stepping stone in the evolution of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24. 219–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. and Joseph, Brian D.
2003On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics”. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 3–180. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language: its Nature, Development and Origin. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Krausser, Peter
1977The three fundamental structural categories of Charles S. Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 13 (3). 189–215.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H.
1967Biological Foundations of Language. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2016Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (1). 6–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
1995Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Minghui & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
2016A dynamic approach to Peirce’s interrogative construal of abductive logic. IFCoLog Journal of Logic and its Applications 3 (1). 74–104.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement to C. K. Ogden & A. I. Richards, The meaning of meaning, 296–336. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Marraffa, Massimo
N.d. Theory of Mind. In James Fieser & Bradley Dowdy eds. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ISSN 2161-0002 http://​www​.iep​.utm​.edu​/theomind/ accessed 09.10.2017
Maturana, Humberto R.
2002Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 9 (3–4). 5–34.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R. & Francisco G. Varela
1972De máquinas y seres vivos. Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G.
2005Peircean induction and the error-correcting thesis. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 41 (2). 299–319.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert
1934 In Charles W. Morris (ed.), Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Nikolić, Danko
2015Practopoiesis: Or how life fosters a mind. Journal of Theoretical Biology 373. 40–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paavola, Sami
2005Peircean abduction: instinct or inference? Semiotica 153–1/4):131–154.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
[1992–1998] The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. N. Houser and C. Kloesel (vol. 1: 1867–1893) and The Peirce Edition Project (vol. 2: 1893–1913). Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S.
1893Evolutionary Love. The Monist III (1): 176–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[1902] MS 530Google Scholar
[1905] Letters to Lady Welby, July 16 1905.
[1906] Letters to Lady Welby. MS [R] L463.
[1907] MS 293.
[1908] Letters to Lady Welby. MS 843.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko
2005Cultivating habits of reason: Peirce and the logica utens versus logica docens distinction. History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (4). 357–372.Google Scholar
2014Logical and linguistic games from Peirce to Grice to Hintikka. Teorema 33 (2). 121–136.Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko & Francesco Bellucci
2014New Light on Peirce's Conceptions of Retroduction, Deduction, and Scientific Reasoning. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (4). 353–373. (doi:Crossref)Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis
2011An explorer upon untrodden ground: Peirce on Abduction. In S. Hartmann & J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic Vol. 10: Inductive Logic, 117–151. Elsevier.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael
1978The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1989How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Collective intentions and actions. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, M. E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communications, 401–415. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Construction of Social Reality. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
2009What is language? Some preliminary results. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1). 173–202.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. & Marcel Danesi
2000The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter
2009Phatic communion. In Gunter Senft, Jan-Ola Östman & Jeff Verschueren (eds.), Culture and Language Use, 226–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
2014From speech with others to speech for self. A case study of “externalized drama”. In I. Arnon, M. Casillas, C. Kurumada & B. Estigarribia (eds.), Language in Interaction. Studies in honor of Eve V. Clark, 315–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Staat, Wim
1993On Abduction, Deduction, Induction and the Categories. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (2). 225–237.Google Scholar
Stephens, William O.
n.d. Stoic ethics. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 2161-0002, http://​www​.iep​.utm​.edu​/stoiceth​/#H2/. (Accessed 14.07.2018).Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymanna, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon & Stephen C. Levinson
2009Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-taking in Conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (26). 10587–10592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel
1903[1890] The Laws of Imitation. (Translated by E. C. Parsons with introduction byF. Giddings). New York: Henry, Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Ole N.
2006Towards an integrated Functional-Pragmatic theory of language and language change. In commemoration of Eugenio Coseriu (1921–2002)”. In Ole N. Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change. Evolution and beyond [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 279], 307–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010From Talking Heads to Communicating Bodies: Cybersemiotics and total communication. Entropy 12 (3). 390–419. (doi:Crossref)Google Scholar
2017Walking together we create the road – Linguistic conventions and conventionalisation from a Peircean perspective. In Dorte Duncker & Bettina Perregaard (eds.), Creativity and continuity. Perspectives on the dynamics of language conventionalisation, 379–414. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University Press.Google Scholar
2019Prolegomena to Cybersemiotic Discourse Pragmatics. Total Human Evolutionary Cognition and Communication. In C. Vidales & Søren Brier (eds.), Cybersemiotics. An International Perspective. In prep.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Ole N. & Søren Brier
2014Total integrative evolutionary communication. Towards a Cybersemiotics Discourse Pragmatics. Public Journal of Semiotics 6 (1). 22–57.Google Scholar
Thrane, Torben
2004Hvorfor er sproget så svært at forstå når det er så let at forstå?Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 2 (2). 37–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The Language Faculty – Mind or Brain? Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 7 (1/5). 1–42.Google Scholar
DeTienne, André
1989Peirce est-il un phénoménologue? Études Phénoménologiques 9-10. 51–75.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne & H. Moll
, H 2005Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5). 675–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn
2002Making sense of infants making sense. Intellectica 34(1). 161–188.Google Scholar
von Uexküll, Jakob
1909Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2011Abduction or inertia? The logic of syntactic change. In C. Cummins, C. -H. Elder, T. Godard, M. Macleod, E. Schmidt & G. Walkden (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, 230–239. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
2001 [1953] Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zeman, J. Jay
1986Peirce’s philosophy of Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 22. 1–22.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2014Human uniqueness, bodily mimesis and the evolution of language. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 2014 (27). 197–219.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Thomsen, Ole Nedergaard
2021.  In Introduction to Cybersemiotics: A Transdisciplinary Perspective [Biosemiotics, 21],  pp. 479 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.