Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 107–122

Deconstructing markedness in sound change typology

Notes on θ > f and f > θ

| The Graduate Center, CUNY
Many sound changes have been attributed to misperception (Ohala 1981, 1993). When two sounds A and B are perceptually similar, A can be misperceived as B and vice versa. One sound change attributed solely to perceptual similarity is θ > f (Blevins 2004). Misperception of [θ] as [f] yields θ > f, while hearing [f] as [θ] should lead to f > θ changes. Context-free shifts of θ > f are attested, but regular f > θ changes are rare. Recent research questions the existence of f > θ changes and the perceptual basis of θ > f changes. Historical, typological, experimental, developmental, and language contact data reviewed here support the original perceptual account of θ > f and f > θ, suggesting that the observed asymmetry can be explained phonetically and structurally, without reference to markedness (cf. Andersen 2008).
Keywords: sound change, markedness, perceptual similarity, dental fricative
Published online: 18 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.345.04ble
References

References

Alvar, Manuel
1996 Manuel de dialectología hispánica: el español de España. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning
1989 Markedness theory: The first 150 years. In Olga Miseska Tomic (ed.), Markedness in synchrony and diachrony, 11–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Markedness and the theory of linguistic change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219), 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Naturalness and Markedness. In Klaas Willems and Ludovic de Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and Iconicity in Language (Iconicity in Language and Literature, 7.), 101–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., & Edwards, Jan
2010 Generalizing over lexicons to predict consonant mastery. Laboratory Phonology 1. 319–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Byron, Ward Goodenough, Frederick Jackson, Jeffrey Marck, Kenneth Rehg, Ho-min Sohn, Stephen Trussel, & Judith Wang
2003 Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions 1. Oceanic Linguistics 42. 1–110.Google Scholar
Biggs, Bruce
1965 Direct and indirect inheritance in Rotuman. Lingua 14. 383–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2004 Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 New perspectives on English sound patterns: ‘Natural’ and ‘Unnatural’ in Evolutionary Phonology. Journal of English Linguistics 34. 6–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Natural and unnatural sound patterns: A pocket field guide. In Klaas Willems and Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, 121–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Structure-preserving sound change: A look at unstressed vowel syncope in Austronesian. In Alexander Adelaar and Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Bob Blust, 33–49. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2015 Evolutionary Phonology: A holistic approach to sound change typology. In Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons (eds.), Handbook of Historical Phonology, 485–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017 Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert
2009 The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert and Stephen Trussel
2013 Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. www​.trussel2​.com​/ACD.
Brannen, Kathleen J.
1998 The acquisition of interdentals in L2. University of Ottawa, MOT Phonology Workshop.Google Scholar
2011 The perception and production of interdental fricatives in second language acquisition. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana, and José I. Hualde
2007 From hiatus to diphthong: the evolution of vowel sequences in Romance. Phonology 24. 37–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Chene, Brent E. and Stephen R. Anderson
1979 Compensatory lengthening. Language 55. 505–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Alice T. and Mousa M. Amayreh
2000 Phonological errors and sound changes in Arabic-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 14. 79–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jan & Mary E. Beckman
2008 Some cross-linguistic evidence for modulation of implicational universals by language-specific frequency effects in phonological development, Language Learning and Development, 4(2). 122–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jan, Beckman, Mary E., and Munson, Benjamin
2015 Frequency effects in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42:306–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eilers, Rebecca E.
1977 Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61. 1321–1336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eilers, Rebecca E. and Fred D. Minifie
1975 Fricative discrimination in early infancy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18. 158–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich and Otto Jastrow
1980 Handbuch der arabischen Dialekte. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Flynn, Darin and Sean Fulop
2014 Acoustic Phonetic Features in Athabaskan Sound Change. Diachronica 31(2). 192–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew and Keith Johnson
2013 Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G., James E. Flege., Reiko Akahane-Yamada and Jesica C. Pruitt
2000 An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults‘ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (5). 2711–2724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Mary E., Emily Kirsten, and Sadanand Singh
1979 Role of distinctive features in dichotic perception of 21 English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65. 1039–1046.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hetzron, Robert
(ed.) 1997 The Semitic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1985 Distinguished Lecture: F. American Anthropologist, New Series 87. 263–281.Google Scholar
Howren, Robert A.
1975 Some isoglosses in Mackenzie-drainage Athapaskan: First steps toward a subgrouping. In Annette McFadyen Clark (ed.), Northern Athapaskan Conference 1971, 577–618. Ottawa: Ethnology division, National Museum of Man.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith and Molly Babel
2010 On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics 38. 127–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark J.
2002 More on the “instability” of interdental fricatives: Gothic þliuhan ‘flee’ and Old English flēon ‘flee’ revisited. Word 53(1). 1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, Allard., Ratree Wayland, and Serena Wong
2000 Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108. 1252–1263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya
2002 Compensatory lengthening: Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
1995 Unstable fricatives: On Gothic þliuhan ‘flee’ and Old English flēon ‘flee’. Word 46. 207–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins, and John Lewis
1968 A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final report, Cooperative Research Project 3288. Vols. I and II.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
1996 The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambacher, Stephen., William Marten, Brian Nelson & Jonathan Berman
1997 Perception of English voiceless fricatives by native speakers of Japanese. In J. Leather and A. James (eds.), New Sounds 97: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech, 186–195. Klagenfurt: University of Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
Levitt, Andrea, Peter W. Jusczyk, Janice Murray & Guy Carden
1988 Context effects in two-month-old infants’ perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14. 361–368.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian
1984 Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian & Kristin Precoda
1990 UPSID-PC. The UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database. Accessible from [http://​www​.linguistics​.ucla​.edu​/facility​/sales​/software​.htm]
Maddieson, Ian
2008 Chapter 9 Presence of Uncommon Consonants. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Languages Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
McGuire, Grant and Molly Babel
2012 A cross-modal account for synchronic and diachronic patterns of /f/ and /θ/ in English. Laboratory Phonology 3. 251–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Carolyn
1995 A Veneto Lexicon: the Dialect of Segusino and Chipilo. Treviso, Italy: Grafiche Antiga.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. & Patricia Nicely
1955 An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions among some English Consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27. 338–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Francisco
1996 “Castilla la Nueva.” In Manuel Alvar (ed.), Manuel de dialectología hispánica: El español de España , 213–232. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. J.
1981 The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. Hendrick, & M. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1983 The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech, 189–216. New York: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. J.
1990 The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 258–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon
2004 A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. BLS 30.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio
1996 La lengua española en Guinea Ecuatorial. In Manuel Alvar (ed.), Manuel de dialectología hispánica: El español de España, 381–388. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
1989 A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt
1975 A guide to the languages of the world. Stanford: Stanford University Language Universals Project.Google Scholar
Severtsen, Eva
1960 Cockney Phonology. Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Smit, Anna Bosma
1993 Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Norms Project: Consonant Singletons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 533–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabain, Marija
1998 Non-Sibilant Fricatives in English: Spectral Information above 10 kHz. Phonetica 55. 107–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, George W.
1972 The position of the Tsetsaut among Northern Athapaskans. International Journal of American Linguistics 39. 14–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, Marylyn May
1996 Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wells, John C.
1982 Accents of English, vols. 1–3. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wenk, B. J.
1979 Articulatory setting and de-fossilization. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4. 202–220.Google Scholar