Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 181191
References

References

Andersen, Henning
1973Abductive and deductive change. Language 49. 765–793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1980Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 1–50. The Hague: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Synchrony, diachrony, and evolution. In Ole Nedergaard Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change: Evolution and beyond, 59–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avery, John
1872Contributions to the history of verb-inflection in Sanskrit. Journal of the American Oriental Society 10. 219–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, B[erthold].
1874Das altindische Verbum aus den Hymnen des Ṛigveda seinem Baue nach dargestellt. Halle: Waisenhaus.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Bert[h]old
1888Altindische Syntax. Halle: Waisenhaus. Repr 1968, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Geldner, Karl Friedrich
(transl) 1951Der Rig-Veda aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen, 3 vols. (Harvard Oriental Series, 33–35.) Repr. 2003 in one volume (Harvard Oriental Series, 63), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies.Google Scholar
Griffith, Ralph T. H.
1895–1896. The hymns of the Atharvaveda. Benares/London: Lazarus & Co./Luzac & Co.Google Scholar
Grassmann, Hermann
1873Wörterbuch zum Rig-Veda. Leipzig: Brockhaus. Repr. 1964, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
2016Pāṇini’s language: Real or not? In Andrew Miles Bird, Jessica DeLisi, and Mark Wenthe (eds.), Tavet tat satyam: Studies in honor of Jared S. Klein on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, 101–112. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W., and Joel P. Brereton
(transl) 2014 The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
1996Vedic -ya-presents: Semantics and the placement of stress. In Wolfgang Meid (ed.), Sprache und Kultur der Indogermanen: Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft Innsbruck, 22.-28. September 1996, 341–350. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
2001 The Vedic ya-presents . Universiteit Leiden Proefschrift.Google Scholar
2011aDrifting between passive and anticausative: True and alleged accent shifts in the history of Vedic -ya-presents. Вопросы языкового родства /Journal of Language Relationship 6. 185–215.Google Scholar
2011bPassive to anticausative through impersonalization: The case of Vedic and Indo-European. In Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siwierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 229–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The Vedic -ya-presents: Passives and intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan . Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Revision of Kulikov 2001; not available to me.)Google Scholar
2013Language vs. grammatical tradition in ancient India: How real was Pāṇinian Sanskrit? Evidence from the history of late Sanskrit passives and pseudo-passives. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 59–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lubotsky, Alexander
1997 Ṛgvedic word concordance, 2 vols. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Pāṇini. 4th c. BC (?). Aṣṭādhyāyī. Ed. and transl. Otto Böhtlingk
1887Pâṇini’s Grammatik. Leipzig: Haessel. Repr.1971, Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Śarmā Ācārya, Śrīrām
2005Atharvaveda saṁhitā [ saral hindī bhāvārth sahit ], 1. Mathurā: Gāyatrī Tapobhūmi.Google Scholar
Speijer, J. S.
1886Sanskrit syntax. Leiden: Brill. Repr. 1998, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
1896Vedische und Sanskrit-Syntax. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1879Sanskrit grammar including both the classical language, and the older dialects, of Veda and Brahmana. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (2nd ed. 1889, repr. 1955, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.)
1905 Atharva-Veda Samhita, translated with a critical and exegetical commentary by William Dwight Whitney, revised and brought nearer to completion and edited by Charles Rockwell Lanman. (Harvard Oriental Series, 7 and 8.) Boston/London/Leipzig: Harvard University/Ginn & Company/Harrassowitz.Google Scholar