Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 381394
References

References

Abuladze, Lia and Andreas Ludden
2013The vocative in Georgian. In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Haziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 25–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning
2012The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica 51. 122–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, Christian & Bodo Winter
2013Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3. 1–27.Google Scholar
Bethin, Christina Y.
2012On Paradigm Uniformity and Contrast in Russian Vowel Reduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30.2. 425–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danièl’, Mikhail A.
2009 “Novyj” russkij vokativ: istorija formy usečennogo obraščenija skvoz’ prizmu korpusa pis’mennyx tekstov. In K. L. Kiseleva, V. A. Plungjan, E. V. Raxilina, S. G. Tatevosov (eds.), Korpusnye issledovanija po russkoj grammatike, 224–244. Moscow: Probel 2000.Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael and Andrew Spencer
2009 The vocative – an outlier case. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 626–634. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Endresen, Anna, Laura A. Janda, Robert Reynolds & Francis M. Tyers
2016Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics 40(2). 1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faulhaber, Susen, Thomas Herbst and Peter Uhrig
2013Funktionswortklassen im Englischen: linguistische und lexikografische Perspektiven. In Eva Breindl & Annette Klosa (eds.), Funktionswörter|buch|forschung: Zur lexikographischen Darstellung von Partikeln, Konnektoren, Präpositionen und anderen Funktionswörtern. Germanistische Linguistik 221–222, 59–110. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Fink, Robert O.
1972Person in nouns: Is the vocative a case? The American Journal of Philology 93. 61–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floricic, Franck
2011Le vocative et la périphérie du système des cas: entre archaisms et innovations. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, Nouvelle Série Tome XIX: L’évolution grammaticale à travers les langues romanes. 103–134.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A.
1993Macedonian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, 249–305. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Girvin, Cammeron
2013Addressing changes in the Bulgarian vocative. In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Haziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 157–188. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Robert D.
1996The Balkan Slavic Appellative. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas & Susen Schüller
2008Introduction to Syntactic Analysis – A Valency Approach. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2014Vocatives. How Syntax Meets with Pragmatics (= Empirical Approaches to Linguistics Theory 5). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Holden, Kyril T.
1978Initial and final consonant clusters in Russian and English. Russian Language Journal 32 (112), 19–42.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Alexander
1962Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Formenlehre. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman O.
1971Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Roman Jakobson, Selected Writings. Vol. II, 3–15. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
1993A Geography of Case Semantics: The Czech Dative and the Russian Instrumental (= Cognitive Linguistics Research, v. 4). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Back from the brink: A study of how relic forms in languages serve as source material for analogical extension. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. and Steven J. Clancy
2006The Case Book for Czech. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. and Lene Antonsen
2016The ongoing eclipse of possessive suffixes in North Saami: A case study in reduction of morphological complexity. Diachronica 33 (3), 330–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit
2014Vokativar i norsk. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 32. 130–165.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Valentin
1967Russische historische Grammatik. Vol. 2. Die Entwicklung des Formensystems. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Linguistics 26. 79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. D.
2011Part-of-Speech Tagging from 97% to 100%: Is It Time for Some Linguistics? In Alexander Gelbukh (ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 12th International Conference, CICLing 2011, Proceedings, Part I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6608, 171–189.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H.
2007Language interrupted. Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Linguistic simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress? Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plungjan, Vladimir A.
2002K semantike russkogo lokativa (“vtorogo predložnogo padeža”). Semiotika i informatika 37. 229–254.Google Scholar
Sonnenhauser, Barbara and Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna
2013Introduction: Vocative! In: Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Haziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 1–23. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Worth, Dean
1983Conditions on –á plural formation in Russian. Wiener slawistischer Almanak 11. 257–262.Google Scholar
1984Russian GEN2, LOC2 Revisited. In Joost van Baak (ed.), Signs of Friendship. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
. 2014. Davvisámegiela -ráigge – substantiiva, advearba, postposišuvdna vai kásus? Sámi dieđalaš áigecála 2014 (2). ISSN 0805-4312.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1974Hey, Whatsyourname. In Michael La Galy, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. April 19-21, 1974, 787–801. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1985Clitics and particles. Language 61(2). 283–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Floricic, Franck & Lucia Molinu
2018.  In Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 252],  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Nábělková, Mira
2019. “Here’s to you, dear Janko, on your birthday...” On the ways of addressing people in Slovak (and something over and above that). Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 70:3  pp. 627 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.