Signs of grammaticalization
Tracking the get-passive through COHA
In this study, I examine a large number of get-passives from different genres and time periods in the Corpus of Historical American English for signs of grammaticalization by looking for evidence of semantic bleaching and morphosyntactic generalization. A comparable set of be-passives is included as a control group throughout. The study shows a dramatic increase in the frequency of central get-passives between the 1870s and the 1990s. Changes in situation type, subject type, and range of past-participle collocates, which are traced through all four genres in the corpus, provide further indications that the get-passive is continuing to grammaticalize over the period.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Aim and scope
- 1.2Grammaticalization and the get-passive
- 1.3Parameters investigated in the present study
- 2.Material and methods
- 2.1COHA
- 2.2Data selection and retrieval
- 2.3Classification of passives in the data sets
- 3.Results and discussion
- 3.1Diachronic frequency of central and semi-passives in COHA
- 3.2Situation type
- 3.3Subject type
- 3.4Frequent past participles in get- and be-passives
- 4.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
Sources
-
References
-
Appendix
References (33)
Sources
Davies, Mark
(
2004)
BYU-BNC. (Based on the
British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Retrieved from
[URL].
Davies, Mark
(
2008)
The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from
[URL].
Davies, Mark
(
2010)
The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Retrieved from
[URL].
Anderwald, Lieselotte
(
2016)
Language between Description and Prescription: Verbs and Verb Categories in Nineteenth-century Grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biber, Douglas
(
1988)
Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward
(
1999)
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London & New York: Longman.
Brinton, Laurel J.
(
1988)
The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, Ronald, & McCarthy, Michael
(
1999)
The English get-passive in Spoken Discourse: Description and Implication for an Interpersonal Grammar.
English Language and Literature 3(1), 41–58.
Chappell, Hilary
(
1980)
Is the get-passive Adversative? Papers in Linguistics
13, 411–452.
Fleisher, Nicholas
(
2006)
The Origin of Passive get
.
English Language and Linguistics 10(2), 225–252.
Garey, Howard B.
(
1957)
Verbal Aspect in French.
Language 33(2), 91–110.
Givón, Talmy, & Yang, Lynne
Gronemeyer, Claire
(
1999)
On deriving complex polysemy: The grammaticalization of get
.
English Language and Linguistics 3(1), 1–39.
Haegeman, Liliane
(
1985)
The get-passive and Burzio's Generalization.
Lingua 66, 53–77.
Hopper, Paul J.
(
1991)
On Some Principles of Grammaticization. In
Elizabeth Closs Traugott, &
Bernd Heine (Eds.),
Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1:
Theoretical and Methodological Issues (17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
(
1993)
Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
(
2003)
Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, Robin
(
1971)
Passive Resistance. In
Papers from the 7th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 140–163.
Leech, Geoffrey
(
2004)
Recent Grammatical Change in English: Data, Description, Theory. In
Karin Aijmer, &
Bengt Altenberg (Eds.),
Advances in Corpus Linguistics (61–81). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian, & Smith, Nicholas
(
2009)
Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian
(
1997)
Parallel Corpora: A Real-time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress. In
Magnus Ljung (Ed.),
Corpus-based Studies in English (195–209). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mair, Christian
(
2006)
Twentieth-century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian
(
2011)
Grammaticalization and Corpus Linguistics. In
Heiko Narrog, &
Bernd Heine (Eds.),
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (239–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mair, Christian, & Hundt, Marianne
(
1995)
Why is the Progressive Becoming more Frequent in English? A Corpus-based Investigation of Language Change in Progress.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43(2), 111–122.
Pullum, Geoffrey K.
(
2014)
Fear and Loathing of the English Passive.
Language and Communication 37(7), 60–74.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
(
1985)
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.
Schwarz, Sarah
(
2015)
Passive Voice in American Soap Opera Dialogue.
Studia Neophilologica 87(2), 152–170.
Siegal, Allan M., & Connolly, William G.
(
2015)
The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (5th ed.). New York: Penguin Random House LLC.
Siemund, Rainer
(
1995) ‘
For Who the Bell Tolls’: Or Why Corpus Linguistics Should Carry the Bell in the Study of Language Change in Present-day English.
Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20(2), 351–376.
Vendler, Zeno
(
1957)
Verbs and Times.
The Philosophical Review 66(2), 143–160.
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Kytö, Merja & Erik Smitterberg
Schwarz, Sarah
2019.
“This Must Be Looked Into”: A Corpus Study of the Prepositional Passive.
Journal of English Linguistics 47:3
► pp. 249 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.