Variation and change at the interface of syntax and semantics
Concessive clauses in American English
Based on the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), this chapter inspects diachronic changes of constructions involving the concessive conjunctions although, though and even though from the 1860s to the present day. Following a short summary of changes in semantics and clause structures, the main focus lies on factors that have an effect on the position of the subordinate clause relative to the matrix clause. A Bayesian logistic regression model is used to investigate in how far the position of a subordinate clause can be predicted from the semantics of the entire construction, the connective that is used, and the weight (or length) of the complement, and whether the preferred positions of subordinate clauses change over time.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background and previous research
- 2.1Three semantic types of concessives
- 2.2‘Contrastive sequencing’
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results
- 4.1Semantics
- 4.2Complement-internal syntax
- 4.3Complement length
- 4.4Multifactorial analysis of contrastive sequencing
- 5.Discussion, conclusion and outlook
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (47)
Aarts, Bas
(
1988)
Clauses of Concession in Written Present-Day British English.
Journal of English Linguistics 21(1), 39–58.
Altenberg, Bengt
(
1986)
Contrastive Linking in Spoken and Written English. In
Gunnel Tottie, &
Ingegerd Bäcklund (Eds.),
English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium (13–40). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
(
1989)
Théorie de l’Argumentation,Topoï, et Structuration Discursive.
Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 18(1), 13–55.
Azar, Moshe
(
1997)
Concessive Relations as Argumentations.
Text 17(3), 301–316.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward
(
1999)
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bürckner, Paul-Christian
(
2016)
brms: Bayesian Regression Models using Stan. R package version 1.3.0. Retrieved from
[URL]
Chafe, Wallace L.
(
1976)
Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View. In
Charles N. Li (Ed.),
Subject and Topic (27–55). New York: Academic Press.
Chafe, Wallace L.
(
1984)
How People Use Adverbial Clauses.
Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 437–449.
Crevels, Mily
(
2000)
Concessives on Different Semantic Levels: A Typologocal Perspective. In
Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen, &
Bernd Kortmann (Eds.),
Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (313–339). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culicover, Peter W.
(
1976)
Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Davies, Mark
(
2010–)
The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Retrieved from
[URL].
Diessel, Holger
(
2005)
Competing Motivations for the Ordering of Main and Adverbial clauses.
Linguistics 43(3), 449–470.
Diessel, Holger
(
2008)
Iconicity of Sequence. A Corpus-based Analysis of the Positioning of Temporal Adverbial Clauses in English.
Cognitive Linguistics 19, 457–482.
Finegan, Edward
(
1995)
Subjectivity and subjectivisation: an introduction. In
Dieter Stein, &
Susan Wright (Eds.),
Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives (1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, Cecilia E.
(
1993)
Grammar in Interaction. Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gelman, Andrew, & Pardoe, Iain
(
2007)
Average Predictive Comparisons for Models with Nonlinearity, Interactions, and Variance Components.
Sociological Methodology 37(1), 23–51.
Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John B., Stern, Hal S., Dunson, David B., Vehtari, Aki, & Rubin, Donald B.
(
2013)
Bayesian Data Analysis. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.
(
2003)
Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5), 219–224.
Hawkins, John A.
(
1994)
A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, John A.
(
1998)
Some Issues in a Performance Theory of Word Order. In
Anna Siewierska (Ed.),
Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe (729–780). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hermodsson, Lars
(
1994)
Der Begriff ‘konzessiv’. Terminologie und Analysen.
Studia Neophilologia 66, 59–75.
Hilpert, Martin
(
2013)
Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, Sebastian
(
2005)
Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions. London: Routledge.
Huddleston, Rodney D., & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
(
2002)
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
König, Ekkehard
(
2006)
Concessive Clauses. In
Keith Brown (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Vol. II, 820–824). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Krifka, Manfred
(
2008)
Basic Notions of Information Structure.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3–4), 243–276.
Kruschke, John K.
(
2015)
Doing Bayesian Data Analysis. A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lambrecht, Knud
(
1996)
Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lang, Ewald
(
2000)
Adversative Connectors on Distinct Levels of Discourse: A Re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s Three-level Approach. In
Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen, &
Bernd Kortmann (Eds.),
Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (235–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McElreath, Richard
(
2016)
Statistical Rethinking. A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
di Meola, Claudio
(
1998)
Zur Definition einer logisch-semantischen Kategorie: Konzessivität als ‘versteckte Kausalität’.
Linguistische Berichte 175, 329–352.
Oxford English Dictionary Online
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL] [accessed 22/2/2017].
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
(
1985)
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Arnold.
R Development Core Team
(
2016)
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.4. [computer program] Retrieved from
[URL]
Radford, Andrew
(
1981)
Transformational Syntax: A Student’s Guide to Chomsky’s Extended Standard Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
RStudio Team
(
2009-2016)
RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Version 1.0.136. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc. Retrieved from
[URL]
Sarkar, Deepayan
(
2014)
lattice: Lattice graphics. R-package version 0. 20–29. Retrieved from
[URL]
Schützler, Ole
(
2018a)
Grammaticalization and information structure: Two perspectives on diachronic changes of notwithstanding in written American English. English Language and Linguistics
22(1), 101–122.
Schützler, Ole
(
2018b)
Concessive conjunctions in written American English: Diachronic and genre-related changes in frequency and semantics. In
Richard J. Whitt (Ed.),
Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change (195-218). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stan Development Team
(
2016)
Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual, Version 2.12.0. Retrieved from
[URL]
Sweetser, Eve E.
(
1990)
From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vehtari, Aki, Gelman, Andrew, & Gabry, Jonah
(
2017)
Practical Bayesian Model Evaluation Using Leave-one-out Cross-validation and WAIC.
Statistics and Computing. 27(5), 1413–1432.
Watanabe, Sumio
(
2010)
Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory.
Journal of Machine Learning Research 11, 3571–3594.
Wiechmann, Daniel, & Kerz, Elma
(
2013)
The Positioning of Concessive Adverbial Clauses in English: Assessing the Importance of Discourse-pragmatic and Processing-based Constraints.
English Language and Linguistics 17(1), 1–23.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Schützler, Ole
2020.
Although‐constructions in varieties of English.
World Englishes 39:3
► pp. 443 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.