Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27-31 July 2015
Edited by Michela Cennamo and Claudia Fabrizio
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 348] 2019
► pp. 479–500

Chapter 23
Meaning change from superlatives to definite descriptions

A semantic approach

This paper analyzes a hitherto unnoticed semantic change process in Chinese, in which superlative operators emerge from lexical (adjectival) materials, and subsequently turn into definiteness markers. Our analysis focuses on the compositional semantics that underlies this meaning change trajectory. Specifically, we argue that frequent association of gradable adjectives with a superlative meaning leads to pragmatic strengthening in which the superlative meaning conventionally enters the literal meaning. Furthermore, we show that a further change in the extension of the nominal part of superlative phrases leads to a maximality reanalysis that is compatible with the semantics of definite NPs. This paper contributes to the burgeoning field of applying truth-conditional semantics to theories of grammaticalization (e.g., Eckardt 2006).
Keywords: grammaticalization, semantic change, gradable adjectives, definite descriptions, apposition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Uses of da-NumPs
    • 2.1The lexical use
    • 2.2The superlative use
    • 2.3The scale-setting use
    • 2.4The non-ranking uses
  • 3.Theory
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.23che
References (41)
References
AnderBois, Scott, Adrian Brasoveanu & Robert Henderson. 2011. Crossing the appositive/at-issue meaning boundary. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory. 20. 328–346.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate & Theo Vennemann. 1972. Semantic Structures. Linguistische Berichte 20. 19–32.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30:4. 509–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of 'semantic parameter'. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, 53–104. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Ashwini Deo. 2014. Aspect Shifts in Indo-Aryan and Trajectories of Semantic Change. In Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, 261–292. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cresswell, Max. 1977. The semantics of degree. In Barbara Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2014. Formal Semantics/pragmatics and Language Change. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 393–409. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Diachronic Semantics. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 1:1. 179–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. The Semantic and Pragmatic Underpinnings of Grammaticalization Paths: The Progressive to Imperfective Shift. Semantics and Pragmatics 8. 11–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Wei-guang. 2009. Some Problems Regarding Analysing Chinese Compound Word Structures. Studies in Language and Linguistics 3.16–36.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 2010. Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1967. Logic and conversation. In Paul Grice (ed.), The William James Lectures, 41–58. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 22–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1995. Superlatives: A Case Study on the Division of Labor of Syntax and Semantics. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
. 1999. Notes on Superlatives. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
. 2015. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Handbook of Semantics, 996–1025. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Höllmann, Thomas. 2014. The Land of The Five Flavors: A Cultural History of Chinese Cuisine. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Ewan. 1980. A Semantics for Positive and Comparative Adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:1. 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In Johan van Benthem, Peter van Emde Boas & Renate Bartsch (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, 76–115. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, 302–23. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Scott. 2016. Supplemental Update. Semantics and Pragmatics9:5. 1–61.
McCawley, James. 1992. Justifying Part-Of-Speech Assignments In Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 211–46.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for number. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13. 258–275.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2012. Directed scale segments. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 22. 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharvy, Richard. 1980. A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions. The Philosophical Review 89:4. 607–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stateva, Penka. 2005. Presuppositions in Superlatives. Ms., Humboldt University Berlin.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. Pragmatic strenghthening and grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. 406–416.Google Scholar
. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 65:1. 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The Semantics-Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, Kai, Danny Fox & Sabine Iatridou. 2014. Definiteness as Maximal Informativeness. In Luka Crnič & Uli Sauerland (eds.), The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim, 165–174. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Johanna. 2003. Definiteness and Number: Determiner Phrase and Number Phrase in the History of English. Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2007. Demonstratives and Possessives: From Old English to Present-Day English. In Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Nominal Determination: Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence, 339–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yanovich, Igor. 2016. Old English *Motan, variable-force modality, and the presupposition of inevitable actualization. Language 92:3. 489–521.Google Scholar