Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27-31 July 2015
Edited by Michela Cennamo and Claudia Fabrizio
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 348] 2019
► pp. 563–592

Chapter 26
Linguistic divergence under contact

The normal result of language contact is widely assumed to be convergence, as manifested in classic Sprachbünde and caused through metatypy, cognitive economy, shared norms of conversational practice, etc. Yet at the same time there is growing evidence that contact can also produce divergence, originating with Larsen’s idea of ‘neighbour opposition’) and developed through Thurston’s work on eseterogeny (elaboration of difference and impenetrability) to account for the apparently deliberate cultivation of language difference found in many parts of Melanesia.
I argue that contact-induced divergence is more prevalent than previously thought, drawing on case studies from New Guinea and Northern Australia. Crucial ingredients are mechanisms for generating divergent structures (psycholinguistic, systemic), social settings favouring the linguistic signalling of group-membership distinctions, and social processes of linguistic ideology and praxis selecting for distinct structural options as social signalling devices.
Keywords: complexification, correspondence mimicry, doppel avoidance, language contact, language convergence, language divergence, metalinguistic awareness, metatypy, multilingualism, naboopposition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contact and convergence as a default assumption in historical linguistics
  • 3.Discovering divergence: Some case studies
    • 3.1Contact-triggered divergence: A partial pedigree
    • 3.2Lexicon
    • 3.3Phonological divergence
    • 3.4Morphological divergence
    • 3.5Morphosyntactic divergence
  • 4.Divergence under contact: Towards a general model
    • 4.1Mechanisms for generating diverse structures
      • 4.1.1Metalinguistic awareness of correspondences
      • 4.1.2Doppel avoidance
      • 4.1.3Summative complexification
    • 4.2Social settings favouring linguistic elaboration of group-membership distinctions
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.26eva
References (90)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry & David Nash. 1999. Lexical replacement and cognate equilibrium in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 19:1. 5–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D., Andrew Meade, Chris Venditti, Simon J. Greenhill & Mark Pagel. 2008. Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science 319(5863). 588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Mary. 1983. This side, that side: Locality and exogamous group definition in Southwest Papua. University of Chicago PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James. 1972. The integration of linguistic theory. In Robert P. Stockwell & Ronald K. S. Macaulay (eds.), Linguistic change and generative grammar, 22–31. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan Niecisław. (1885) 1972. Foreign alternations, i.e. alternations which are due to the influence of another language (Chapter 6 of An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations: A chapter from psychophonetics, 144–212), 187–193. In A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology: The beginnings of Structural Linguistics, edited and translated by Edward Stankiewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Geoffrey. 1976. An outline of Temiar grammar. In Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson & Stanley Starosta (eds.), Austroasiatic studies (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 13), Part 1, 129–187.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2012. Hawu vowel methathesis. Oceanic Linguistics 51. 207–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 2014. Introduction. In Braunmüller, Höder & Kühl 2014, 1–10.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt, Steffen Höder & Karoline Kühl (eds). 2014. Stability and divergence in language contact. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capell, Arthur & Heather E. Hinch. 1970. Maung grammar, texts and vocabulary. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2008. An exercise in “a posteriori” language sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61:3. 208–220.Google Scholar
De Groot, Annette M. B. 2011. Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: An introduction. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dench, Alan. 2001. Descent and diffusion: The complexity of the Pilbara situation. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 105–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of north Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1). 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döhla, Hans-Jörg. 2014. Diachronic convergence and divergence in differential object marking between Spanish and Portuguese. In Braunmüller, Höder & Kühl 2014, 265–289.Google Scholar
Ellison, Mark, Nicholas Evans, Eri Kashima, Dineke Schokkin & Daniel Williams. 2016. Do shared norms cross language boundaries? A case study from multilingual Southern New Guinea. Paper presented at NWAV-AP4 Conference, Chiayi, Taiwan, 16/4/2016.Google Scholar
Ellison, Mark & Luisa Miceli. 2017. Language monitoring in bilinguals as a mechanism for rapid lexical divergence. Language 93:2. 255–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. (ed,). 2002. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005. Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34. 181–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience. Forthcoming. Amazonian linguistic diversity and its sociocultural correlates. In Mily Crevels, Jean-Marie Hombert & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Language dispersal, diversification and contact: A global perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, Nicholas. 1994. The problem of body parts and noun class membership in Australian languages. University of Melbourne Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 1–8.Google Scholar
. 1997. Head classes and agreement classes in the Mayali dialect chain. In Mark Harvey & Nicholas Reid (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, 105–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Iwaidja mutation and its origins. In Anna Siewierska and Jae Jung Song (eds.), Case, typology and grammar: In honour of Barry J. Blake, 115–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Iwaidjan, a very un-Australian language family. Linguistic Typology 4:2. 91–142.Google Scholar
. 2003a. Bininj Gun-wok: A pan-dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2003b. Context, culture and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32. 13–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Australian languages reconsidered: A review of Dixon (2002). Oceanic Linguistics 44:1. 216–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Pseudo-argument affixes in Iwaidja and Ilgar: A case of deponent subject and object agreement. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches. Proceedings of the British Academy 145. 271–296.Google Scholar
. 2011. A tale of many tongues: Documenting polyglot narrative in North Australian oral traditions. In Brett Baker, Ilana Mushin, Mark Harvey & Rod Gardner (eds.), Indigenous language and social identity. Papers in honour of Michael Walsh, 291–314. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2012. Even more diverse than we thought: the multiplicity of Trans-Fly languages. In Nicholas Evans & Marian Klamer (eds.) Melanesian languages on the edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st century (Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication No. 5), 109–149.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. MS. Towards a grammar of Ilgar/Garig. Unpublished manuscript.
Evans, Nicholas, Wayan Arka, Matthew Carroll, Yun-Jung Choi, Christian Döhler, Volker Gast, Eri Kashima, Emil Mittag, Bruno Olsson, Kyla Quinn, Dineke Schokkin, Philip Tama, Charlotte Van Tongeren & Jeff Siegel. 2017. The languages of Southern New Guinea. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of New Guinea: A comprehensive guide. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 621–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett. 2002. The semantics of gender in Mayali: Partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78:1. 111–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John L. 1958. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14. 47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2011. Social ecology and language history in the Northern Vanuatu Linkage: A tale of divergence and convergence. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1(2). 175–246. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Garde, Murray. 2008. Kun-dangwok: “clan lects” and Ausbau in western Arnhem Land. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 19:1. 141–169.Google Scholar
Gomez-Imbert, Elsa. 1999. Variétés tonales sur fond d’exogamie linguistique. Cahiers de Grammaire 24. 67–93.Google Scholar
Green, Ian. 2003. The genetic status of Murrinh-patha. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia: Comparative studies of the continent’s most linguistically complex region (Pacific Linguistics 552), 125–158. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Green, Rebecca. 2004. Gurr-goni, a minority language in a multilingual community: Surviving into the 21st century. In Joe Blythe & R. McKenna-Brown (eds.), Proceedings of the seventh FEL conference, Broome, Western Australia, 22–24 September 2003. Bath: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Robert Wilson. 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 151–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 2005. On the part played by human conscious choice in language structure and language evolution. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David Rood (eds.), Language diversity and linguistic theories, 105–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Mark. 2011. Lexical change in pre-contact Australia. Diachronica 28. 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Barbara. 1984. Variation in Australian English: The sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Jean E. 1983. The fish people: Linguistic exogamy and Tukanoan identity in northwest Amazonia. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapovic, Mate. 2011. Language, ideology and politics in Croatia. Slavia Centralis IV(2). 45–56.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Göz. 2010. Non-convergence despite language contact. In Peter Auer & Jurgen E. Schmidt (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1, 478–493. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1998. A theory of linguistic signs. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. (1952) 1978. Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen von 1800–1950. Munich: Pohl.Google Scholar
Koch, Harold. 1997. Comparative linguistics and Australian prehistory. In Patrick McConvell & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Archaeology and linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in global perspective, 27–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. Loanwords between the Arandic languages and their western neighbours: Principles of identification and phonological adaptation. In Lauren Gawne & Jill Vaughan (eds.), Selected papers from the 44th conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013, 311–334. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. [URL]Google Scholar
. 2018. The development of Arandic subsection terms in time and space. In Patrick McConvell, Piers Kelly & Sebastien Lacrampe (eds.), Kin, skin and clan. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Kühl, Karoline & Kurt Braunmüller. 2014. Linguistic stability and divergence: An extended perspective on language contact. In Braunmüller, Höder & Kühl 2014, 14–38.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don. 1992. Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self and syncretism in a Papua new Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2010. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 3, Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Amund B. (1917) 1993. Naboopposition – knot. In Ernst H. Jahr, Ove Lorentz & Marit Christoffersen (eds.), Historisk språkvitenskap (Studier i Norsk Språkvitenskap 5), 97–131. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Laycock, Don. 1982. Linguistic diversity in Melanesia: A tentative explanation. In Rainer Carle, Martina Heinschke, Peter Pink, et al.. (eds.), Gava’:Studies in Austronesian languages and cultures dedicated to Hans Kähler, 31–37. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. 1985. The origin of subsections in Northern Australia. Oceania 56. 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Shibbolethnonyms, ex-exonyms and eco-ethnonyms in Aboriginal Australia: The pragmatics of onymization and archaism. Onoma. 41. 185–214.Google Scholar
Nash, David. 1997. Comparative flora terminology of the central Northern Territory area. In Patrick McConvell & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Comparative linguistics and Australian prehistory, 187–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ponsonnet, Maïa. 2015. Nominal subclasses in Dalabon (Southwestern Arnhem Land). Australian Journal of Linguistics 35:1. 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Levey, Stephen. 2010. Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Peter Auer & Jurgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and Space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1: Theories and methods, 391–419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In Mark Durie, Malcolm D. Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact 1:1. 116–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2002. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 638–668. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. (1915) 1979. Cours de linguistique générale, ed/ by C. Bally & A. Sechehaye. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Singer, Ruth. 2016. The Dynamics of Nominal classification: Productive and Lexicalised Uses of Gender Agreement in Mawng. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton Pacific Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Ian & Steve Johnson. 1986. Sociolinguistic patterns in an unstratified society: The patrilects of Nganhcara. Journal of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistics Association 8. 29–43.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Arthur P., Jr. 1967. Multilingualism in the Northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist 69. 670–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N. 2008. A sociotonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change 20:3. 409–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. “Eating the food of our place”: Sociolinguistic loyalties in multidialectal Sui villages. Language in Society 38:3. 287–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Peter, 1978. Wik: Aboriginal society, territory and language at Cape Keerweer, Cape York Peninsula, Australia. St Lucia: University of Queensland PhD thesis.Google Scholar
. 1997. Materialism, sacred myth and pluralism: Competing theories of the origin of Australian languages. In Francesca Merlan, John Morton & Alan Rumsey (eds.), Scholar and sceptic: Australian Aboriginal studies in honour of L.R. Hiatt, 211–242, 297–309. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2007. Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Language Contact – Thema 1. 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1987. Processes of change in the languages of north-western New Britain (Pacific Linguistics B-99). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thurston, William. 1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In R. Harlow & R. Hooper (eds.), VICAL I: Papers in Oceanic linguistics, 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1992. Sociolinguistic typology and other factors effecting change in north-western New Britain, Papua New Guinea. In T. Dutton (ed.), Culture change, language change: Case studies from Melanesia, 123–139. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine Travis. 2017. Bilingualism in the community: Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2015. Gauging convergence on the ground: Code-switching in the community. International Journal of Bilingualism (Special Issue). 19:4. 365–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. (1953) 1968. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Khachaturyan, Maria, George Moroz & Pe Mamy
2024. Do languages spoken in multilingual communities converge? A case study of reflexivity marking in Mano and Kpelle. Linguistics 62:5 ► pp. 1225 ff. DOI logo
Sinnemäki, Kaius & Noora Ahola
2023. Testing Inferences about Language Contact on Morphosyntax: A Typological Case Study on Alorese–Adang Contact. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:3 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Louagie, Dana & Uta Reinöhl
2022. Typologizing nominal expressions: the noun phrase and beyond. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.