References

References

Bach, K. & R. M. Harnish
(1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J.
(1980) Old and new views on language history and language. In H. Lüdtke (Ed.), Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels (pp. 182–252). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bergs, A.
(2006) Language change and the role of the individual in historical social network analysis. Logos and Language. Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory. VI.2. 30–54.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, A.
(1981) Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina, & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 51–80). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E.
(1958 / 1974) Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. München: Fink. (First published as Sincronía, diacronía e historia. El problema del cambio lingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.)Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman/Pearson.Google Scholar
Diewald, G.
(2009) Konstruktionen und Paradigmen, Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik , 37 (pp. 445–468). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorgeloh, H. & A. Wanner
forthcoming) Discourse Syntax: English grammar beyond the sentence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drinka, B.
(2017) Language contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellegard, A.
(1953) The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J.
(2014)  Natural causes of language: Frames, biases, and cultural transmission (Conceptual Foundations of Language Science 1). Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S.
(1979) Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology 18, 345–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.
(2012) Frequencies, probabilities, and association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language. 36.3, 477–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1985) Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R.
(Ed.) (2002) The language myth in Western culture. Richmond, UK: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2005) Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. & García-Vidal, T.
(2018) Style-shifting and accommodative competence in late Middle English written correspondence: Putting audience design to the test of time. Folia Linguistica Historica 39: 383–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M.
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C.
(1965) Sound change. Language, 41(2), 185–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1987) Emergent grammar. In J. Aske, N. Berry, L. Michaelis, & H. Filip, eds., Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In: E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.). Grammaticalization. Vol. I. Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. (pp. 17-37.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R.
(1997) Inherent variability and linguistic theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 73–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M., Mollin, S., & Pfenninger, S.
(Eds.) (2017) The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R.
(1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1997) In what sense can explanations of language change be functional? In J. Gvozdanovic (Ed.), Language change and functional explanation (pp. 9–20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(2012) Grammaticalization as optimization. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman & A. Garrett, Grammatical change. Origins, nature, outcomes (pp. 15–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuteva, T., Heine, B., Hong, B., Long, H., Narrog, H., and Rhee, S.
(2019) World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd extensively revised and updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, H.
(Ed.) (1980a) Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1980b) Sprachwandel als universales Phänomen. In H. Lüdtke, (Ed.), Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1980c) Auf dem Weg zu einer Theorie des Sprachwandels. In H. Lüdtke, (Ed.), Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels (pp. 182–254). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luraghi, S.
(2010) Causes of language change. In S. Luraghi, & V. Bubenik (Eds.), The continuum companion to historical linguistics (pp. 354–366). London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W.
(1981) Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.Google Scholar
Milroy, J.
(1992) Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1999) Toward a speaker-based account of language change. In E. Jahr (Ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics (pp. 21–36). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L.
(1985) Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 339–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S.
(2001) The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J.
(1981) The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Maseck, R. A. Hendrick, & M. F. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior (pp. 178–203). Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Petré, P.
2017The extravagant progressive: An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [BE Ving]. English Language and Linguistics 21: 227–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization,” Language 94: 4, 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stein, D.
(1985) Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In R. Eaton, O. Fischer, W. Koopman, F. van der Leek, (Eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, 10–13 April, 1985 (pp.283–302). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Semantic similarity between categories as a vehicle of linguistic change. Diachronica 5:1, 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) The semantics of syntactic change: Aspects of the evolution of do in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, M.
(2002) The language myth and the law. In R. Harris (Ed.), The language myth in Western culture (pp. 159–182). Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1982) From propositional to textual and expressive meaning; Some semanticpragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics (pp. 245–271). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & Heine, B.
(Eds.) (1991) Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. I. Theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(2010) (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. . Crossref
Traugott, E. C. & G. Trousdale
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.
(1968) In: W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.). Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U.
(1984) Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Berlin: Akademieverlag.Google Scholar