Contact and change in Neo-Aramaic dialects
Aramaic, a Semitic language, has survived down
to modern times as a spoken language in a large diversity of
Neo-Aramaic dialects. This paper examines various aspects of
contact-induced linguistic change in the subgroup of dialects known
as North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA). These dialects have for many
centuries been in contact with various other languages, including
Semitic (Arabic) and non-Semitic (Kurdish, Persian, Armenian, Turkic
languages). Various motivating factors can be identified for
contact-induced change in the NENA dialects. These are
sociolinguistic and internal systemic. When change occurs it often
involves only partial convergence. Change sometimes results in
imitations of the morphology of the contact language using internal
morphological elements. Sociolinguistic and internal systemic
factors can also inhibit change in a contact situation.
Keywords: Aramaic, Neo-Aramaic, contact-induced change, perfect, copula, word order, homophony, aspiration, ergative, Kurdish, Armenian
Article outline
- 1.The Neo-Aramaic dialects
- 2.Constraints on change
- 2.1Constraint on lexical transfer
- 2.2Size of community and geographical location
- 2.3Potential homophony
- 2.4Change inhibited by contact
- 3.Systemic motivations for contact-induced change
- 3.1Elimination of homophony
- 3.2Enrichment of resources
- 4.Partial convergence
- 4.1Perfect construction
- 4.2Copula
- 4.3Word order
- 5.Imitation of morphology
- 6.Reflection of change in contact language
- 7.Summary
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References
References (60)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2003). Language
contact in
Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, G. D. S. (2011). Auxiliary verb constructions (and other complex predicate types): A Functional–Constructional overview. Language and
Linguistics
Compass, 5(11), 795–828. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L. (2015). Language
change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chyet, M. L. (1995). Neo-Aramaic
and Kurdish: An interdisciplinary consideration of their
influence on each
other. Israel Oriental
Studies, 15, 219–249.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clyne, M. (1967). Transference
and triggering. The Hague: Nijhoff.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coghill, E. (2016). The
rise and fall of ergativitiy in Aramaic: Cycles of Alignment
Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickey, S. M. (2011). The
varying role of po- in the grammaticalization of Slavic
aspectual systems: Sequences of events, delimitatives, and
German language
contact. Journal of Slavic
Linguistics, 19(2), 75–230. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, M. S. (2009). The
branching direction theory of word order correlations
revisited. In S. Scalise, E. Magni, & A. Bisetto (Eds.), Universals
of Language
Today (pp. 185–207). Berlin: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epps, P. & Stenzel, K. (2013). Introduction. In P. Epps & K. Stenzel (Eds.), Upper
Rio Negro: Cultural and linguistic interaction in
northwestern
Amazonia (pp. 13–52). Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional Museu do Índio – Funai.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farrar, K. & Jones, M. C. (2002). Introduction. In M. C. Jones & E. Esch (Eds.), Language
change: The interplay of internal, external and
extra-linguistic
factors (pp. 1–18). Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floyd, S. (2013). Semantic
transparency and cultural calquing in the northwest
Amazon. In P. Epps & K. Stenzel (Eds.), Upper
Rio Negro: cultural and linguistic interaction in
northwestern
Amazonia (pp. 271–306). Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional Museu do Índio – Funai.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gaunt, D. (2006). Massacres,
resistance, protectors: Muslim–Christian relations in
Eastern Anatolia during World War
I. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T. (1979). On
understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language
universals with special reference to feature
hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. (2002). World
lexicon of
grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jastrow, O. (1978). Die
mesopotamisch-arabischen
qəltu-Dialekte (Vol. 1). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jastrow, O. (1979). Zur
arabischen Mundart von
Mossul. Zeitschrift Für
Arabische
Linguistik, 2, 36–75.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jastrow, O. (2011). Ṭuroyo
and
Mlaḥsô. In S. Weninger, G. Khan, M. Streck, & J. Watson (Eds.), The
Semitic Languages: An International
Handbook (pp. 697–707). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jastrow, O. (2015). Language
contact as reflected in the consonant system of
Ṭuroyo. In A. M. Butts (Ed.), Semitic
languages in contact. Leiden-Boston: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jügel, T. (2015). Die
Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion im Alt- und
Mitteliranischen − Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung zu
Kasus, Kongruenz und
Satzbau. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (forthcoming). The
diachronic development of the copula in Neo-Aramaic
dialects.
Khan, G. (2001). Quelques
aspects de l’expression d’ “être” en
néo-araméen. In A. Donabédian (Ed.), Langues
de Diaspora. Langues en
Contact (pp. 139–148). Paris: Ophrys.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2002a). The
Neo-Aramaic dialect of
Qaraqosh. Boston, MA: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2002b). The
Neo-Aramaic dialect of the Jews of
Rustaqa. In W. Arnold & H. Bobzin (Eds.), “Sprich
doch mit deinen Knechten aramäisch, wir verstehen es!” 60
Beiträge zur Semitistik, Festschrift für Otto Jastrow zum
60.
Geburtstag (pp. 395–410). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2007). The
North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic
Dialects. Journal of Semitic
Studies, 52(1), 1–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2008a). The
Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of
Urmi. Piscataway: Gorgias. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2008b). The
Neo-Aramaic dialect of
Barwar (Vols. 1–3). Leiden: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2009). The
Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of
Sanandaj. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2011). North-Eastern
Neo-Aramaic. In S. Weninger, G. Khan, M. Streck, & J. Watson (Eds.), The
Semitic languages: An internatioanl handbook (pp. 708–724). Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2012). Remarks
on the historical development of the copula in
Neo-Aramaic. In F. Corriente, G. del Olmo Lete, Á. Vicente, & J.-P. Vita (Eds.), Dialectology
of The Semitic Languages Proceedings of the Iv Meeting on
Comparative Semitics Zaragoza
11/6–9/2010 (pp. 25–31). Sabadell: AUSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2016). The
Neo-Aramaic dialect of the Assyrian Christians of
Urmi (Vols. 1–4). Leiden-Boston: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khan, G. (2017). Ergativity
in
Neo-Aramaic. In J. Coon, D. Massam, & L. Travis (Eds.), Oxford
Handbook of
Ergativity (pp. 873–899). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacKenzie, D. N. (1961). Kurdish
dialect studies. London, New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Makaev, E. A. (1977). The
origins of the modal particle ke in
Armenian. In N.Ya Gabaraev (Ed.), Questions
of Iranian and General
Philology (pp. 195–200). Tbilisi: Metsniereba.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Y. (1968). The
inflectional paradigm as an occasional determinant of sound
change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions
for historical
linguist (pp. 20–64). Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Y. (1976). Multi-conditioned
sound change and the impact of morphology on
phonology. Language, 52, 757–778. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meillet, A. (1921). Linguistique
historique et linguistique
générale. Paris: Champion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milroy, L. (1987). Language
and social
networks. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mutzafi, H. (2008). The
Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Betanure (province of
Dihok). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual
speech: A typology of
code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling
languages: Grammatical structure in code-switching. Oxford: Clarendon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic
diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. (1981). The
limits of
awareness. In Working
Papers in
Sociolinguistics (Vol. 84). Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talay, S. (2008a). Die
Neuaramaischen Dialekte Der Khabur-Assyrer in Nordostsyrien:
Einführung, Phonologie und
Morphologie. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talay, S. (2008b). The
neo-Aramaic dialects of the Tiyari Assyrians in Syria: with
special consideration of their phonological
characteristics. In G. Khan (Ed.), Neo-Aramaic
Dialect
Studies (pp. 39–63). Piscataway: Gorgias Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thackston, W. M. (2006a). Kurmanji
Kurdish. A reference grammar with selected
readings. Renas Media. Retrieved
from [URL]
Thackston, W. M. (2006b). Sorani
Kurdish: A Reference Grammar with Selected
Readings. Retrieved
from [URL]
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects
in
contact. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P. (1989). Contact
and isolation in linguistic
change. In L. E. Breivik & E. H. Jahr (Eds.), Language
change: contributions to the study of its
causes (pp. 227–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P. (2009). Sociolinguistic
typology and
complexification. In G. Sampson, D. Gil, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language
complexity as an evolving
variable (pp. 98–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Asadpour, Hiwa
2023.
Parts of speech and the placement of Targets in the corpus of languages in northwestern Iran.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:3
► pp. 487 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.