Chapter 9
Another look at Persian rā
A single formal analysis of a multi-functional morpheme
The morpheme -rā has typically been analyzed as an instance of differential object marking, appearing on direct objects that are definite or in some sense specific. In this chapter, we discuss several cases in which -rā may appear on DPs that are not direct objects. Building on insights from dependent case theory (Marantz 1991; Baker & Vinokurova 2010, Preminger 2011, 2014, Kornfilt & Preminger 2014), we develop an analysis of -rā, according to which it is the realization of accusative case, treated as a dependent case assigned in syntax, and a specificity feature. In addition to accounting for the facts discussed in the context of Modern Persian, we show how an extension of our analysis can account for the distribution of -rā in Classical Modern Persian.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Theoretical background
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Prediction
- 6.Classical Modern Persian
- 7.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References
Baker, Mark
2017 Structural case: A realm of syntactic microparameters. In
Simin Karimi &
Massimo Piattelli-Montabelli (eds.),
Parameters, what are they, where are they? Special issue of Linguistic Analysis. 41(3/4). 191–240.
Baker, Mark & Nadya Vinokurova
2010 Two modalities of Case assignment: Case in Sakha.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28. 593–642.
Benveniste, Emile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Bhatt, Rajesh
2007 Unaccusativity and case licensing. Talk presented at McGill University.
Browne, Wayles
1970 More on definiteness marker: Interrogatives in Persian.
Linguistic Inquiry 1. 359–563.
Brunner, Christopher Joseph
1977 A syntax of western Middle Iranian (Vol. 3). New York: Caravan Books.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2001 Derivation by phase. In
Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.),
Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diesing, Molly
1992 Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations.
Linguistic Inquiry 23. 353–380.
Enç, Murvet
1991 The semantics of specificity.
Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.
Freeze, Ray
1992 Existentials and other locatives.
Language, 68:3. 553–595.
Ghomeshi, Jila
1996 Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
Ghomeshi, Jila
1997 Topics in Persian VPs.
Lingua, 102(2). 133–167.
Guéron, Jacqueline
1995 On have and be. In
Proceedings-NELS 25. 191–206. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Harley, Heidi
1995 Subjects, events and licensing. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Heim, Irene
1982 The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Holmberg, Anders & Urpo Nikanne
2002 Expletives, subjects, and topics in Finnish. In
Peter Svenonius (ed.),
Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, 71–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2014 Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis.
Lingua 150. 1–24.
Karimi, Simin
1989 Aspects of Persian syntax: Specificity and the theory of grammar. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.
Karimi, Simin
1990 Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions.
Linguistic Analysis 20(3/4). 139–191.
Karimi, Simin
1997 Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional.
Lexicology 3(2). 273–318.
Karimi, Simin
2005 A Minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Karimi, Simin & Mike Brame
2013 A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian.
Linguistic Analysis 38(1–2). 111–144.
Kayne, Richard
1993 Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection.
Studia Linguistica 47(1). 3–31.
Kornfilt, Jaklin & Omer Preminger
2014 Nominative as no case at all: An argument from raising-to-Accusative in Sakha. Manuscript, Syracuse University.
Lazard, Gilbert
1963 La langue des plus anciens monuments de la prose persane. Paris: Klincksieck.
Mahootian, Shahrzad
1997 Persian. London: Routledge.
Marantz, Alec
1991 Case and licensing. In
German Westphal,
Benjamin Ao &
Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.),
Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference On Linguistics (
ESCOL 8), 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Preminger, Omer
2011 Agreement as a fallible operation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Preminger, Omer
2014 Agreement and its failures. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rāsekhi, Vahideh
2018 Ellipsis and information structure: Evidence from Persian. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University dissertation.
Samiian, Vida
1983 Structure of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-Bar analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.
Samiian, Vida
1994 The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In
Mehdi Marashi (ed.),
Persian studies in North America: Studies in honor of Mohammad Ali Jazayery, 17–42. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Karimi, Simin, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri & Jian Gang Ngui
Moezzipour, Farhad & Neda Moezzipour
Pastor, Dorian, Agnes Korn & Christian Rammer
2024.
Colloquial Persian: Towards a New Rise of Simple Verbs?1.
Transactions of the Philological Society 122:1
► pp. 21 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.